SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número38O Grito de Irreverência de Gil BlasUma geografia para a guerra: narrativas do cerco em Francisco José de Caldas índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de Estudios Sociales

versão impressa ISSN 0123-885X

Resumo

MEJIA, Sergio. The Republic, Beyond the Old Homeland and The Possible Nation: Inciting to a Republican Discussion. rev.estud.soc. [online]. 2011, n.38, pp.88-107. ISSN 0123-885X.

This article seeks to stimulate thought around the language we use in social sciences and in Colombian public fields when speaking about Colombia; in other words, to promote thought, debates, and proposals about the country in general. I propose bringing the notion of the republic to the forefront, and abandoning the use -“ except in specific cases -“ of the notions of patria (homeland), and nation. The notion of republic refers to a geographic field of law, certainly in constant construction, but completely tangible, applicable, and susceptible of being discussed with regard to its validity, reform, application, or infraction. The notion of republic opens possibilities of critical thought regarding history, social sciences, humanities, law, and art, and simultaneously leads to responsible and pertinent discussions in the public field. At the same time, the word patria was used in the origins of the republic to invoke in its favor feelings of local belonging forged in previous centuries and which are today extemporaneous. The term nation, in highly inequitable societies such as Colombia's, refers to a project set in the future, and it is not uncommon to find the expression "construction of a nation". As a category of social analysis, the term has limited reach and its effect in critical thought is to create ambiguity and mystification. To demonstrate this I focus on two relatively recent books in which a debate between two general and opposite perceptions of Colombia is tacitly started. This debate loses strength precisely because it is stated in terms of nation and not of republic. I am referring to the books of Alfonso Múnera, El fracaso de la nación (The Failure of Nation) (1998) and Eduardo Posada Carbó, La nación soñada (The Dreamed Nation) (2006).

Palavras-chave : Republic; Nation; Patria (homeland); Contemporary Social Studies of Colombia; Catechisms in National History; The Failure ofNation (1998); The Dreamed Nation(2006); Public Field in Colombia; Language of Social Sciences.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons