SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue68CEPAL and ISI: Reconsidering the Debates, Policies and OutcomesRegional Integration and Industrialization Policies in Latin America: A Conflictive Love Story author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Estudios Sociales

Print version ISSN 0123-885X

Abstract

LYNE, Mona. Bringing the Structure Back in: Limited Access Orders, “Extreme” ISI and Development. rev.estud.soc. [online]. 2019, n.68, pp.27-37. ISSN 0123-885X.  https://doi.org/10.7440/res68.2019.03.

Structuralists highlighted politico-economic constraints on late development and advocated infant industry policies. In practice, highly distortionary implementation choices were near ubiquitous. Why did policymakers prefer this extreme policy? Employing North, Wallis & Weingast (2009), I argue politicians were constrained by a limited access order (LAO) to directly distribute production rights to powerful groups. “Extreme” ISI policies maximized politicians’ ability to directly distribute production rights; a milder policy meant replacing state-conferred rights with market mechanisms. I review representative “extreme” policies in Brazil, Chile and India, and then demonstrate their political efficacy in diversifying production rights that could be directly exchanged for elite support. Finally, I discuss the argument’s consistency with early structuralist emphasis on underlying politico-economic conditions as impediments to growth.

Keywords : Economic development; import substitution; infant industry; limited access order; patron-client networks; structuralism.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )