Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Revista de Estudios Sociales
versión impresa ISSN 0123-885X
Resumen
LYNE, Mona. Bringing the Structure Back in: Limited Access Orders, “Extreme” ISI and Development. rev.estud.soc. [online]. 2019, n.68, pp.27-37. ISSN 0123-885X. https://doi.org/10.7440/res68.2019.03.
Structuralists highlighted politico-economic constraints on late development and advocated infant industry policies. In practice, highly distortionary implementation choices were near ubiquitous. Why did policymakers prefer this extreme policy? Employing North, Wallis & Weingast (2009), I argue politicians were constrained by a limited access order (LAO) to directly distribute production rights to powerful groups. “Extreme” ISI policies maximized politicians’ ability to directly distribute production rights; a milder policy meant replacing state-conferred rights with market mechanisms. I review representative “extreme” policies in Brazil, Chile and India, and then demonstrate their political efficacy in diversifying production rights that could be directly exchanged for elite support. Finally, I discuss the argument’s consistency with early structuralist emphasis on underlying politico-economic conditions as impediments to growth.
Palabras clave : Economic development; import substitution; infant industry; limited access order; patron-client networks; structuralism.