SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número68CEPAL e ISI: reconsideración de los debates, las políticas y los resultadosIntegración regional y políticas de industrialización en América Latina: la historia de un amor conflictivo índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de Estudios Sociales

versión impresa ISSN 0123-885X

Resumen

LYNE, Mona. Bringing the Structure Back in: Limited Access Orders, “Extreme” ISI and Development. rev.estud.soc. [online]. 2019, n.68, pp.27-37. ISSN 0123-885X.  https://doi.org/10.7440/res68.2019.03.

Structuralists highlighted politico-economic constraints on late development and advocated infant industry policies. In practice, highly distortionary implementation choices were near ubiquitous. Why did policymakers prefer this extreme policy? Employing North, Wallis & Weingast (2009), I argue politicians were constrained by a limited access order (LAO) to directly distribute production rights to powerful groups. “Extreme” ISI policies maximized politicians’ ability to directly distribute production rights; a milder policy meant replacing state-conferred rights with market mechanisms. I review representative “extreme” policies in Brazil, Chile and India, and then demonstrate their political efficacy in diversifying production rights that could be directly exchanged for elite support. Finally, I discuss the argument’s consistency with early structuralist emphasis on underlying politico-economic conditions as impediments to growth.

Palabras clave : Economic development; import substitution; infant industry; limited access order; patron-client networks; structuralism.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )