Resumo

PEREZ-VIDAL, Andrea; DIAZ-GOMEZ, Jaime; SALAMANCA-ROJAS, Karen L  e  ROJAS-TORRES, Leidy Y. Evaluation of drinking-water treatment by Lifestraw^® and Ceramic-pot filters. Rev. salud pública [online]. 2016, vol.18, n.2, pp.275-289. ISSN 0124-0064.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v18n2.48712.

Objective To evaluate under laboratory conditions, the removal efficiency of turbidity and E. coli of two household water filters: LifeStraw^® family (MF) and ceramic pot filter (CPF). Methods The two systems were operated over 6 months using two identical control units per system, treating 7.5 L/d of a synthetic substrate used as raw water. The turbidity of the substrate was adjusted with Kaolinite and the E. coli concentration, with a replica of the ATCC 95922 strain. The differences of effluent quality of the systems, in terms of turbidity and E. coli, were evaluated with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Operative and maintenance aspects, that could limit or enhance the use of the systems, were also considered in the evaluation. Results The water synthetic substrate quality had an average of 32.2 ± 2.8 NTU for turbidity and 3,9x105 UFC/100 mL for E. coli. Both systems reduce the turbidity to values below 2 NTU with an inactivation of 100 % of E. coli. Statistical differences were found between the systems in terms of turbidity removal, MF being more efficient than the CPF (99,2 ± 0.4 % and 97.6 % ± 1.14, respectively). Conclusions Both systems are suitable for household water supply treatment, acheiving the water quality standards established by Colombian regulations. The MF was more efficient for suspended solids removal and filtration rate, but when economic, operative, and maintenance aspects along with social acceptability and lifespan are considered, the CPF seems more suitable, especially in rural areas.

Palavras-chave : Drinking water; Escherichia coli; filtration; water treatment; water turbidity.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )