SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número5Consumption of energy drinks among students of Bogotá, ColombiaOut-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditure in households of Cartagena, Colombia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de Salud Pública

versão impressa ISSN 0124-0064

Resumo

PINHO, Micaela  e  PINTO BORGES, Ana. Economic decisions on who to treat when resources are not enough for everyone. Evidence from a Spanish survey. Rev. salud pública [online]. 2018, vol.20, n.5, pp.584-590. ISSN 0124-0064.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v20n5.69558.

Objective

To analyze the attitudes of Spanish citizens towards the criteria that should be used as a guide to make decisions regarding the prioritization of patients, namely, medical, economic and person-based criteria.

Methods

An online self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 546 Spanish respondents. The questionnaire was made up of three questions. In the first two questions respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma involving four patients (differentiated by personal characteristics and health conditions) where they were asked to: (i) choose only one patient to be treated and (ii) rank the patients' assistance priority order. As for the third question, respondents were asked to state their level of agreement with 14 healthcare rationing criteria through a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, factor analysis and multinomial regressions were used.

Results

Findings suggest that Spanish respondents support a plurality of views on the rationing principles on which healthcare micro allocation decisions should be based. Despite the fact respondents support the idea that all patients should receive healthcare assistance equally, they also consider the age of the patient, as well as economic factors when establishing assistance priories among patients.

Conclusions

If it is not possible to provide health care assistance and treatments to all people, then age and economic factors should guide healthcare priority setting.

Palavras-chave : Healthcare rationing; economics; ethics; social values; public opinion (source: MeSH, NLM).

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )