SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.4 número1Examples of chapter 11 NAFTA disputes, a trade-investment-environment experienceThe extended agreement between Colombia and the International Monetary Fund índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Estudios Socio-Jurídicos

versão impressa ISSN 0124-0579

Resumo

DUMBERRY, Patrick. The NAFTA investment dispute settlement mechanism and the admissibility of amicus curiae briefs by NCOs. Estud. Socio-Juríd [online]. 2002, vol.4, n.1, pp.58-82. ISSN 0124-0579.

The first part of this article gives an overview of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) dispute settlement mechanism between investors and States (Chapter 11). The relevant provisions will be analyzed in the light of the growing case law. The second part will deal in particular with a recent award rendered in the case of Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, where it was decided that the Tribunal had the power under Article 15(1) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and under NAFTA Chapter 11 to accept amicus curiae briefs submitted by several Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). It is the first time in the context of NAFTA or in any other investor-State arbitration that amicus curiae briefs have been accepted from non-State actors. The article examines in detail the reasoning of the Arbitral tribunal and its likely impact in future investor-States dispute settlement mechanisms.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )