SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue29Development of algorithms for the selection of spectral channels in wireless networks of cognitive radio using the recovery and proactive strategiesTeleworking strategy based on to contribute to the socio-labor inclusion of internal conditionally released from prison Heliconias author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista científica

Print version ISSN 0124-2253On-line version ISSN 2344-8350

Abstract

BRICENO-MARTINEZ, John Jairo. Obstacles and improvements to get a university professor of science an argumentative participation students. Rev. Cient. [online]. 2017, n.29, pp.195-203. ISSN 0124-2253.  https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.rc.2016.29.a7.

Research results of a formative investigation process of twelve hours are shown in this paper. The main purpose of this investigation is to guide and walk a university professor (AXL) to design and implement activities that promote argumentative participation of his students throughout a process that is called supervision. This research is a case study based on three nonparticipating observations, in which it is investigated the effect and impact that teachers’ participation in argumentative talks have in students. It is concluded that AXL learned how to drive students into the argumentative process and promoted participation in the classroom; however, despite the effort of the teacher, his/her students neither reached nor achieved the expected argumentative level in spite of their participation.

Keywords : science education; teaching practice; training of university teachers; argumentation and reflection.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )