SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue23Subject and social práxisIdentity statements, propositional invariability and contextual stipulation author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

FLOREZ Q, Daian Tatiana  and  GARCIA D, Carlos Emilio. Rationality and incontinent action: A possible explanation. discus.filos [online]. 2013, vol.14, n.23, pp.79-103. ISSN 0124-6127.

How is well known, the problem of akratic or incontinent actions; i.e., those actions characterized because the agent acts against his best judgement, has been of great interest for philosophers since the time of Socrates. In recent theories, like those advanced by Davidson and by Searle, this problem is examined on the basis of openly contrary claims. In this paper, we shall contrast the views of Searle and Davidson on akrasia. We shall suggest that though Searle's solution is philosophically better than Davidson's solution, still has some limitations and that there is room to entertain other alternatives. Finally, we shall offer one alternative way of explaining the problem of akrasia.

Keywords : incontinent action; akrasia; Davidson; hypothesis of the gap; Searle.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )