SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 issue27Durée and temporality: a defense of Bergson's conception of timeAre the evolutionary debunking arguments of memetics againts the rationality of theism valid? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

GARCIA DUQUE, Carlos Emilio. Karl Popper's scientific realism, as coherent as it is possible. discus.filos [online]. 2015, vol.16, n.27, pp.63-86. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2015.16.27.5.

According to some authors, Popper's realism is blatantly incoherent mainly because of his commitment with the correspondence theory of truth and due to the fact that in his theory of science is granted that, though the general aim of science is the search for truth, it might happen that a specific theory reaches that aim without us being able of knowing it. In this paper, I explain, briefly, the particularities of Popper's realism, his views on truth as a regulative ideal for science, and I show that, regardless the impossibility of establishing in a definitive way that truth has been reached, there is no incoherence that endangers his project. In this way, I answer Cardenas and others' criticisms against Popper's realism and his views on the general aim of science, and I identify the sources from which this kind of misunderstanding springs.

Keywords : Popper; realism; absolute truth; objective truth; aim of science.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License