SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 número27Durée and temporality: a defense of Bergson's conception of timeAre the evolutionary debunking arguments of memetics againts the rationality of theism valid? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Discusiones Filosóficas

versão impressa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumo

GARCIA DUQUE, Carlos Emilio. Karl Popper's scientific realism, as coherent as it is possible. discus.filos [online]. 2015, vol.16, n.27, pp.63-86. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2015.16.27.5.

According to some authors, Popper's realism is blatantly incoherent mainly because of his commitment with the correspondence theory of truth and due to the fact that in his theory of science is granted that, though the general aim of science is the search for truth, it might happen that a specific theory reaches that aim without us being able of knowing it. In this paper, I explain, briefly, the particularities of Popper's realism, his views on truth as a regulative ideal for science, and I show that, regardless the impossibility of establishing in a definitive way that truth has been reached, there is no incoherence that endangers his project. In this way, I answer Cardenas and others' criticisms against Popper's realism and his views on the general aim of science, and I identify the sources from which this kind of misunderstanding springs.

Palavras-chave : Popper; realism; absolute truth; objective truth; aim of science.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons