SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.18 issue30Can reason establish the goals of action? Assessing interpretations of Aristotle’s theory of agencyDavidson and intensional-extensional dilemma: aporiae of interpretation author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127


FLOREZ-QUINTERO, DAIAN TATIANA  and  GARCIA-DUQUE, CARLOS EMILIO. The nature of technology and its links to science: a realist and analogical perspective. discus.filos [online]. 2017, vol.18, n.30, pp.63-78. ISSN 0124-6127.

The nature of the relationship between pure science and applied science (i.e. technology) has been the subject of recurring controversy since ancient times. In the recent work on Philosophy of Technology, those perspectives which build on some alleged independency between science and applied science and the latter and technology to reject any attempt at relating epistemically or pragmatically both areas are prominent. In this paper, we critically examine Feibleman’s arguments to establish a sharp difference between pure and applied science and evaluate the import of his examples and counterexamples. From a realist, fallibilist and analogical perspective, we show that Feibleman does not succeed in proving his thesis and that, on the contrary, there are many more good reasons to defend the existence of a strong tie between applied science and technology despite the fact that there are many instances of concrete technological achievements which preceded the formulation of the corresponding theories that explain or support those realizations.

Keywords : pure science; applied science; technology; realism; argument by analogy; Popper; fallibilism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )