SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue34There’s no truth-theory like the correspondence theoryEpistemology and politics: a critique of the “coloniality of knowledge” thesis. author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

MIRANDA-ROJAS, Rafael.A posteriori necessity, trivialization and overgeneralization”. discus.filos [online]. 2019, vol.20, n.34, pp.43-63. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.34.3.

This paper discusses the plausibility of the admission of general non-natural rigid terms. Theoretical identity statements that include general non-natural rigid terms do not express a posteriori necessity: they are analytical, necessary and a priori statements. Only statements of identity that include general rigid natural terms are statements necessary a posteriori. The problems of trivialization and overgeneralization assume that the application of rigidity to the terms of non-natural kinds, detracts from rigidity as a semantic-modal differentiator, but that is only true if these problems require that any general rigid term allows affirming a posteriori necessity, which is rejected. The nominalization of a general term is proposed as a solution to trivialization and over-generalization. Similarly, a restrictive predicative reading of the general terms is discarded. Finally, the main cases of general non-rigid terms are explained: syntactically complex descriptive terms.

Keywords : Necessity; a posteriori; trivialization; overgeneralization; nominalization; non-natural rigid general term.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )