SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue34“A posteriori necessity, trivialization and overgeneralization”Socio-epistemic mechanisms and scientific practices in the critical rationalism of Karl Popper author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

CHAMBERS, Paul Anthony. Epistemology and politics: a critique of the “coloniality of knowledge” thesis. discus.filos [online]. 2019, vol.20, n.34, pp.65-90. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.34.4.

The thesis of the “coloniality of knowledge” is philosophically weak and historically questionable. Through an analysis of a range of texts of authors of the “decolonial turn” I show that they make unfounded assertions about the connection between Cartesian epistemology and the socio-political conditions and relations of domination in Latin America (colonial domination, capitalist exploitation, racism, sexism). I argue that their conceptualization of the natural and social sciences and their characterization of Cartesian epistemology are superficial and historically dubitable. I conclude that the relation between epistemology and politics that the coloniality of knowledge presupposes is implausible and should be reformulated.

Keywords : Coloniality of knowledge; decolonial turn; Descartes; epistemology; politics.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )