SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue36The hybridity of what is necessary a posterioriEthics, history and philosophy of history in Fichte author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

GIROMINI, José. The impotence of representations: a criticism of John Searle's social ontology. discus.filos [online]. 2020, vol.21, n.36, pp.79-104.  Epub Dec 09, 2020. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2020.21.36.6.

John Searle has advocated an intentionalist approach to the social, namely the idea that social reality is created and maintained by certain mental states and speech acts. In this work, we first present a detailed version of Searle’s intentionalist founding arguments based on the connection between collective recognition and language. In the second place, we offer a critique of these arguments, suggesting that they lead us to admit that the foundations of social reality are more practical than representational.

Keywords : Social ontology; normativity; John Searle; philosophy of mind; pragmatism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )