SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue37Neither conventionalism nor naturalism. The epistemological justification of the truth in Donald DavidsonMain epistemological views in the debate: Lee-Macintosh-Mattessich author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

ACOSTA, Benedicto. Notes on selective realism and its answer to the problem of scientific realism. discus.filos [online]. 2020, vol.21, n.37, pp.57-70.  Epub June 16, 2021. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2020.21.37.4.

The aim of this paper is to briefly present three streams of selective realism, namely structural realism, explanationism, and entity realism, and their relation to scientific realism in general. Firstly, we define philosophical realism; then, scientific realism and selective realism are both characterized. The hypothesis is that the main virtue of selectivism is being able to respond to the problem of unobservable entities in science and to the problem of the historical meta-induction of theories, something that connects it with other realistic proposals. This hypothesis is corroborated in the sections dedicated to these currents, which have the same structure: first, the answer they give to the problem of entities is exposed, followed by the answer to the theoretical problem that the meta-induction argument implies. After all this, there are also some open criticisms of each current.

Keywords : Scientific realism; selectivism; unobservables; meta-induction.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )