SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 número1Modelos de Predicción para Producción de Leche Total y Porcentaje de Grasa a Partir de Muestreos ParcialesEstabilidad Fisicoquímica y Funcional de Uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) Impregnada a Vacío con Calcio y Vitaminas B9, D y E, Durante el Almacenamiento Refrigerado índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín

versión impresa ISSN 0304-2847

Resumen

ALVAREZ MEJIA, Fernando; OLIVEROS TASCON, Carlos Eugenio  y  SANZ URIBE, Juán Rodrigo. Evaluation of Mechanical Beaters in Coffee Harvesting. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín [online]. 2013, vol.66, n.1, pp.6919-6928. ISSN 0304-2847.

Two portable devices were evaluated for coffee harvesting. The Italian-made MAIBO beater (harvest tool), used for coffee harvesting in Brazil, and the beater designed by Cenicafé (CENICAFE-I), which removes fruits by applying pressure to the clusters that have a higher content of ripe fruits. The research was conducted in two stages. In the first, the two beaters were compared using 60 experimental units of seven trees each. The CENICAFE-I beater presented the better quality in the harvested coffee and used an equal amount of time per tree. In the second stage, the performance of the CENICAFE-I beater was compared with the traditional manual method, using an commutative experimental design with 50 plots (replicates) of 14 trees each; randomly assigning seven trees in each plot to each method. The CENICAFE-I beater, without a manual resweep, increased the operational yield by 305.7% as compared to that of the traditional manual method. With an immediate, manual resweep, the operational yields were equal for the two methods. The quality of the coffee collected with the CENICAFE-I was lower than that of manual harvesting and was not acceptable by Colombian standards. In order to reduce the cost of harvesting by 10% when using a pneumatically actuated CENICAFE-I beater, one must achieve yields greater than 40 kg h-1 or 60 kg h-1 when operating 400 or 200 h/year, respectively.

Palabras clave : Semi-mechanized harvest; coffee harvest; beaters; pneumatic harvester.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )