SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue179Nutrient content, acidity, and soil texture in areas degraded by mining in the biogeographic ChocóMathematical analysis of a metapopulation model for dengue dynamics author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales

Print version ISSN 0370-3908

Abstract

CANO, Luisa M.; CARMONA, M. Alejandra; MARTINEZ, J. Alejandro  and  ARIAS, Paola A.. Estimation and forecast of solar radiation in the Aburrá Valley- Colombia. Rev. acad. colomb. cienc. exact. fis. nat. [online]. 2022, vol.46, n.179, pp.529-549.  Epub Sep 13, 2023. ISSN 0370-3908.  https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1576.

The diagnostic and forecast of the surface solar irradiance are important elements for the harnessing of solar energy. By validating against in situ measurements, this study assessed the skill of the ERA5 reanalysis, the GOES16 satellite estimates, and the forecasts from the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) for a site in the Aburrá Valley. The analysis focuses on the diurnal cycle, the seasonal behavior, and the inter-annual variations of the estimates of surface solar irradiance and daily accumulated energy. In general, the reanalysis yielded estimates closer to the observations compared to GOES16. At the daily scale, ERA5 exhibited smaller biases (0.01 to 1.05 kWh/) than the GOES16 estimates (-1.23 to 1.07 kWh/). The ERA5 estimates showed that the solar radiation was higher during El Niño events, especially during the December-January-February season, with an average increase of about 10% compared to the neutral and La Niña conditions. On the other hand, similar to other studies, the WRF forecasts exhibited mean bias errors (MBE) of around 20%, and root mean squared errors (RMSE) of about 50%. Furthermore, the correlation analysis showed that the WRF correctly represents the hourly and day to day variations of solar irradiance with correlation values of around 0.86 and 0.81, respectively. Both the diagnostic estimates from ERA5 and GOES16, as well as the WRF forecasts, showed the largest biases during cloudy and rainy days and seasons.

Keywords : Solar resource; ERA5 reanalysis; GOES-16 satellite; Forecasting; Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF).

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )