SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 número3Asociación de variantes genéticas en TPMT y NUDT15 con los eventos de toxicidad durante la terapia de mantenimiento en niños colombianos con Leucemia Linfoide AgudaEfectos de la terapia periodontal no quirúrgica en pacientes con artritis reumatoide: estudio prospectivo de antes y después índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Colombia Médica

versión On-line ISSN 1657-9534

Resumen

FRANCO HERRERA, Astolfo León et al. Perception of the healthcare accreditation system in Colombia. Colomb. Med. [online]. 2021, vol.52, n.3, e2084894.  Epub 30-Sep-2021. ISSN 1657-9534.  https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v52i3.4894.

Introduction:

Accreditation is an external, systematic, periodic, and voluntary evaluation process to which health care institutions submit themselves in order to demonstrate compliance with superior levels of quality of care. The Icontec, through an evaluative model, accredits the quality of health institutions in Colombia.

Methods:

Descriptive cross-sectional study following the recommendations of the survey study report. Using an electronic format, 22 health institutions with experience in the Icontec accreditation process were surveyed. The instrument evaluated three thematic axes of the process: added value provided by the accreditation process, evaluation process and final report. The measurement was carried out using a Likert-type scale and a descriptive statistical analysis to establish the perception of the phases of the process.

Results:

the items with the best perception were the humanization of care (86.4%) followed by patient safety and teamwork (81.8%). After accreditation, the quality of the processes improved (77.4%), infection prevention and control (68.1%) and physician commitment (63.6%). 54.6% felt that evaluators use different methods of evaluation. 63.6% of the respondents considered that Icontec does not comply with the times defined for the delivery of the report.

Conclusion:

the Icontec accreditation system adds value to health institutions in most of the thematic areas evaluated, especially in the humanization of care and patient safety. The lowest perception is presented in the increase of physicians' commitment.

Palabras clave : Health facility administration; quality assurance; health care; risk management; quality improvement; health facilities; proprietary; patient safety; delivery of health care.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés     · Español ( pdf ) | Inglés ( pdf )