SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 issue15Servicing as an efficient condition of administrative procedures, with special emphasis on peruvian administrative lawConfrontation of argumentation premises: weighing of premises in three difficult cases reviewed by colombian constitutional court author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Opinión Jurídica

Print version ISSN 1692-2530On-line version ISSN 2248-4078

Abstract

GRISALES CARDONA, William Esteban. Towards a procedural juridical science not violating human rights. Opin. jurid. [online]. 2009, vol.8, n.15, pp.45-58. ISSN 1692-2530.

This article tries to reflect the need for structuring a procedural juridical science which can guarantee the application of basic rights throughout the process and, especially, during a sentence, as the most relevant procedural act. The need for a reasonable and practical speech becomes evident in a social right state in which people's basic rights are protected and judges are demanded to exercise a judicial activity which goes beyond a simple application of norms in the search for dispensing justice.

Keywords : Argumentation; human rights; rhetoric; speech.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License