SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue2Dispatching Rules in Elective Surgery Scheduling: Impact on Service Occupation and OpportunityDropout and Graduation Delay in Undergraduate Medical Students. Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Ciencias de la Salud

Print version ISSN 1692-7273

Abstract

MORALES PARRA, Gloria Inés; YANETH GIOVANETTI, María Cecilia  and  ZULETA HERNANDEZ, Andrés. Phenotype Resistance to Methicillin, Macrolides and Lincosamides in Staphylococcus Aureus, Isolated in a Hospital in Valledupar, Colombia. Rev. Cienc. Salud [online]. 2016, vol.14, n.2, pp.223-230. ISSN 1692-7273.  https://doi.org/10.12804/revsalud14.02.2016.07.

Introduction: Infections with methicillin-resistant S. aureus are a public health problem due to the multi-resistance profile presented by this pathogen. Objective: To determine resistance phenotypes to methicillin, macrolides and lincosamides in S. aureus. Materials and methods: 50 S. aureus strains, isolated from patients of the Hospital Rosario Lopez Pumarejo in the city of Valledupar, were analyzed. Susceptibility tests to methicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin were performed using microdilution and agar diffusion methods. Methicillin resistance was determined through agar dilution technique and inducible clindamycin resistance D-Test. Results: Methicillin resistance reached 50%, five phenotypes were established in the analyzed macrolides and lincosamides: phenotype sensitive to erythromycin and clindamycin (78%); phenotype resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin (16%) with constitutive resistance for both cMLSB antimicrobials, which lead the resistance phenotypes; phenotype with intermediate resistance to both antimicrobials (2%); the intermediate result phenotype resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin (2%); and the RS phenotype resistant to erythromycin and sensitive to clindamycin (2%) that show inducible iMLSB clindamycin resistance with positive D test. Conclusions: The inducible resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramines is not established through the standard antimicrobial susceptibility test. Not identifying the inducible resistance can lead to clindamycin treatment failure.

Keywords : Bacterial resistance; Methicillin; Lincosamides macrolides; cMLSB; iMLSB.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License