SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número21LEGISLACIÓN DEL VICIO: ¿VICIO DE LA LEGISLACIÓN? UNA HERMENÉUTICA JURÍDICA DE LA PROHIBICIÓN DE LAS DROGAS índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


International Law

versión impresa ISSN 1692-8156

Resumen

ACOSTA LOPEZ, Juana I. THE COTTON FIELD CASE: GENDER PERSPECTIVE AND FEMINIST THEORIES IN THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE. Int. Law: Rev. Colomb. Derecho Int. [online]. 2012, n.21, pp.17-54. ISSN 1692-8156.

In 2009, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decided the case of three murdered women, whose bodies were found in a cotton field in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico on November 6, 2001, in the context of widespread violence against women. The importance of this case is undisputable as it embraces a gender perspective. The paper critically addresses the gender perspective in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, focusing on the Case of González et al. ("Cotton Field") vs. Mexico of 2009. It shows that although the approach of the Court is symbolically important, there are still several unanswered questions and challenges regarding the correct and proper application of this perspective in the decision. Additionally, the paper shows how the Court embraced some feminist theoretical approaches and problematizes this perspective with the role of the victims in the case. Finally, it suggests some recommendations to balance the challenging tension between the political battle of feminist movements and the interests of human rights' victims. Part I of the paper briefly presents a synopsis of the facts of the Cotton Field case and a summary of the judicial decision. Part II describes the most relevant gender approaches of the case and presents some critiques to the Court's decision. Part III illustrates the tension between the feminist movement and the role of the victims of the case and develops possible alternatives to solve this particular issue.

Palabras clave : Intermerican Court of Human Rights; feminism; crimes against women; violence against women; American Court of Human Rights; victims; feminism; crimes against women; violence against women.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )