SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número27CASE OF INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES KUNA OF MADUNGANDÍ AND EMBERÁ OF BAYANO AND ITS MEMBERS V. PANAMAINTERNATIONAL LAW, CULTURAL DIVERSITY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT: THE CASE OF THE GENERAL FORESTRY LAW IN COLOMBIA índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


International Law

versão impressa ISSN 1692-8156

Resumo

TEIXEIRA ROCHA, Maria Elizabeth Guimarães. THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL SECURITY IN FACE OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL STARE DECISIS. Int. Law: Rev. Colomb. Derecho Int. [online]. 2015, n.27, pp.39-64. ISSN 1692-8156.  https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.il15-27.opsj.

The legal assessment about the unconstitutionalstare decisis is a challengefor The Science of Law. The theme reveals the impossibility of the res iudicata, formal or material, opposes against the Federal Constitution and the difficulties that may even tually come due the principle of legal security and Court surety. Indeed, it is possible in legal terms challenge the judicial decision which conflicts with the State's highest law. In Brazil, Article 5, XXXVIof the Federal Constitution only protects the intangibility of stare decisis with regard of retroactivity of law which could be review or even reversal individual rights. Nevertheless, if a judicial sentence eroded a constitutionalprecept, the Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code as also the Code of Civil Procedure, predicts mechanisms to nullify decisions guaranteed by apronouncement by the Judiciary Power and ends its effects. This article presents the doctrine about this juridical discussion as well as evaluates the available instruments in Comparative Law to attack the immutability of res iudicata contaminated by the worst nullity: the unconstitutionality. In this vein, this text will highlight the jurisprudence of National High Courts to conclude the necessary submission of all state acts -executive, legislative or judicial- to the Constitution, including the stare decisis, which judgments has already been definitively decided and the issue cannot be litigated again. Proclaimed the vertical incompatibility in the face of Lex Magna, the stare decisis must be nullified and operate ex tunc effects as the only way to ensure the normative force of the Constitution.

Palavras-chave : Unconstitutional; stare decisis; legal security; Judiciary Power; judicial review.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )