SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue28El otro cuya palabra puede transformarme. El papel de la alteridad en la hermenéutica de Gadamer.Lo que es por accidente y sus diversas causas en Metafísica E de Aristóteles author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Eidos

Print version ISSN 1692-8857On-line version ISSN 2011-7477

Abstract

FIERRO, María Angélica. Sobre la naturaleza del Éros platónico: ¿daímon o theós?. Eidos [online]. 2018, n.28, pp.157-189. ISSN 1692-8857.

Although in the Symposium Plato describes Erôs as a daimôn-metaxy, i.e. as an intermediate and intermediary divinity between gods and men, in the Phaedrus it is said that Erôs is a theos -a god. I will try to show that these different descriptions do not imply a substantial change of mind but work as two complementary views about the true nature of Erôs. According to the Phaedrus, although erôs can remain just at a physical level and not develop its divine power, it is also possible that, thanks to the same intense, sexual desire for the beautiful boy, the lover recollects the Form of beauty and so grows divine Erôs`s wings. However, only the gods never lose their wings and so are in regular, full contact with the Forms. The human souls need to acquire the wings and even so take the risk of losing them; they are then in an intermediate state -metaxy- like Erôs in the Symposium.

Keywords : Erôs; daimôn; theos; metaxy; Phaedrus; Symposium.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )