SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue29LOS CONCEPTOS DE SER GENÉRICO Y SER SOCIAL EN MARX: SOBRE LOS FUNDAMENTOS ONTOLÓGICOS DE LA EMANCIPACIÓN author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Eidos

Print version ISSN 1692-8857On-line version ISSN 2011-7477

Abstract

ASSALONE, Eduardo. LA ESFERA PÚBLICA EN LOS PRINCIPIOS DE LA FILOSOFÍA DEL DERECHO DE HEGEL. TENSIONES Y MEDIACIONES EN LA VIDA ÉTICA MODERNA. Eidos [online]. 2018, n.29, pp.15-39. ISSN 1692-8857.  https://doi.org/10.14482/eidos.29.10032.

In this paper, we explain two dimensions of public sphere where the tensions of modern ethical life are clearly perceived, according to Hegel's Girundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. First, we present the public side of the states assembly, which has the function of mediating and overcoming the tensions characteristic of the private sphere by means of the political representation of particular interests of civil society. Second, we analyze Hegel's ambivalent position regarding public opinion. According to Hegel, a people knows its true interests only through political representation. The publicity of the parliamentary debates is a necessary condition for the constitution of a people. This original perspective ofpolitical representation anticipates current political theories and clearly differentiates itself from classic understandings of representation.

Keywords : Hegel; public sphere; mediation; the Assembly of the Estates; public opinion; publicity; political representation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )