SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 número29La interpretación de Emmanuel Levinas de Ideas I de HusserlRealidad y arte en Zubiri índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Co-herencia

versión impresa ISSN 1794-5887

Resumen

CHICA-PEREZ, Víctor Hugo. Wittgenstein's solution to the problem of the "concept horse", or how to talk about the structure of the language according to the Tractatus. Co-herencia [online]. 2018, vol.15, n.29, pp.153-177. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.15.29.6.

This article asserts that the distinction made by Wittgenstein in the Tractatus between ‘ordinary concepts’ and ‘formal concepts’ may be construed as a response to the difficulties arising from the Fregean distinction between concept and object, which are traditionally referred to as the ‘concept horse problem’. The paper will show that contradictory and paradoxical expressions that arise both from the attack to the Fregean distinction (e.g., the concept horse is an object) and from its defense (e.g., the concept horse is not a concept), are rooted in an illegitimate attempt, namely, to describe or characterize the logical structure of the proposition by using other propositions. The distinction between ordinary and formal concepts makes it possible to clarify, first, in what sense these expressions are nonsensical; and second, that the distinction between concept and object can only be recognized in symbolism by the characteristics of signs, but it cannot be the object of description.

Palabras clave : Concept horse; formal concept; Tractatus; logical concepts.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )