SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue32Deliberation and Collective Identity Compromising, Directive, and Expressive Uses of ArgumentationAn Argumentative Approach to “Framing” Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Co-herencia

Print version ISSN 1794-5887

Abstract

SALDARRIAGA, Daniel Mejía  and  ARANGO, María Rocío. Social Mobilization and Deliberation The Collective Action Frame as the Conclusion of a Deliberative Dialogue. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.99-118. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.4.

The purpose of this paper is to explain the collective action of social movement organizations by means of framing processes that are understood as the result of a deliberative dialogue. To this end, the text is divided into four sections. The first section introduces the framing theory of social movement studies; the second section examines different explanations concerning the creation of a collective action frame. The third section considers the characterization of Walton and Krabbe’s deliberative dialogue (2017) as well as Fairclough and Fairclough’s practical reasoning scheme (2012) for the purpose of tracing a relationship between collective action framing and such dialogues. The last section concludes that the collective action of activists involved in the framing processes can be understood as a deliberate collective action.

Keywords : Collective action; collective action frame; practical reasoning; social movement; social movement organization; deliberative dialogue.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )