SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue32An Argumentative Approach to “Framing” Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental ConflictReflective Judgment, Common Sense, and Exemplariness A Study on the Paradigm of Judgment and its Reception by Alessandro Ferrara and Hannah Arendt author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Co-herencia

Print version ISSN 1794-5887

Abstract

TINDALE, Christopher W.. Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.159-178. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.6.

The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self- deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation.

Keywords : Argument schemes; Booth; Descartes; rhetorical strategy; self-deliberation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )