SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número32An Argumentative Approach to “Framing” Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental ConflictReflective Judgment, Common Sense, and Exemplariness A Study on the Paradigm of Judgment and its Reception by Alessandro Ferrara and Hannah Arendt índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Co-herencia

versão impressa ISSN 1794-5887

Resumo

TINDALE, Christopher W.. Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.159-178. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.6.

The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self- deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation.

Palavras-chave : Argument schemes; Booth; Descartes; rhetorical strategy; self-deliberation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )