SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue32Reflective Judgment, Common Sense, and Exemplariness A Study on the Paradigm of Judgment and its Reception by Alessandro Ferrara and Hannah ArendtEndoxa, Hypólepsis Parádoxos and Martyría in Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Co-herencia

Print version ISSN 1794-5887

Abstract

AIKIN, Scott F.. What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong). Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.225-238. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.8.

In this paper, I argue for three theses. First, that the problem of Deep Disagreement is usefully understood as an instance of the skeptical Problem of the Criterion. Second, there are structural similarities between proposed optimistic answers to deep disagreement and the problem of the criterion. Third, in light of these similarities, there are both good and bad consequences for proposed solutions to the problem of deep disagreement.

Keywords : Deep disagreement; skepticism; problem of the criterion; argumentation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )