SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número32Qué respuestas optimistas al desacuerdo profundo generan buenos (y malos) efectos“Si yo no tengo dinero, ¿para qué quieres mi herencia?”: la figura del mendigo en la poesía de Joaquín Pablo Posada índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Co-herencia

versión impresa ISSN 1794-5887

Resumen

CARDENAS, Luz Gloria. Endoxa, Hypólepsis Parádoxos and Martyría in Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.239-255. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.9.

This paper initially discusses Aristotle’s theory of slavery in his Book I of Politics in an attempt to demonstrate the use of two procedures: a dialectic process, based on his discussion with Plato, and a rhetorical process, using metaphors and testimonies to set up an epistemological framework for his theory. Subsequently, this work focuses on an issue to be elucidated: the difference between endoxa, thesis (hypólepsis parádoxos), and testimony (martyría). In his description of the dialectical method in Topics, Aristotle explicitly states the meaning of “endoxa” and “thesis”. Furthermore, he discusses the term “testimony” in Books i and ii of Rhetoric. Consequently, these two types of procedures, the types of proof, and the conclusions in his Book i of Politics will be identified based on the characteristics described in Topics and Rhetoric.

Palabras clave : Aristotle; endoxa; testimony; thesis; rhetoric; dialectic; slavery.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )