SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número32What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong)“If i do not have any money, why do you want my inheritance?”: The figure of the beggar in the poetry of Joaquín Pablo Posada índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Co-herencia

versão impressa ISSN 1794-5887

Resumo

CARDENAS, Luz Gloria. Endoxa, Hypólepsis Parádoxos and Martyría in Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.239-255. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.9.

This paper initially discusses Aristotle’s theory of slavery in his Book I of Politics in an attempt to demonstrate the use of two procedures: a dialectic process, based on his discussion with Plato, and a rhetorical process, using metaphors and testimonies to set up an epistemological framework for his theory. Subsequently, this work focuses on an issue to be elucidated: the difference between endoxa, thesis (hypólepsis parádoxos), and testimony (martyría). In his description of the dialectical method in Topics, Aristotle explicitly states the meaning of “endoxa” and “thesis”. Furthermore, he discusses the term “testimony” in Books i and ii of Rhetoric. Consequently, these two types of procedures, the types of proof, and the conclusions in his Book i of Politics will be identified based on the characteristics described in Topics and Rhetoric.

Palavras-chave : Aristotle; endoxa; testimony; thesis; rhetoric; dialectic; slavery.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )