SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue4Anomalous geoelectric potential variations observed along a gas pipeline section in Argentine, possible intensification with variations of the Earth's magnetic fieldSeismic site classification of the Costa Rican Strong-Motion Network based on V S30 measurements and site fundamental period author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Earth Sciences Research Journal

Print version ISSN 1794-6190

Abstract

KONAKOGLU, Berkant  and  AKAR, Alper. Geoid undulation prediction using ANNs (RBFNN and GRNN), multiple linear regression (MLR), and interpolation methods: A comparative study. Earth Sci. Res. J. [online]. 2021, vol.25, n.4, pp.371-382.  Epub Mar 04, 2022. ISSN 1794-6190.  https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v25n4.91195.

This study evaluated different methods for geoid undulation prediction and included two types of artificial neural networks (ANNs) - the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the generalized regression neural network (GRNN) - as well as conventional methods including multiple linear regression (MLR) and ten different interpolation techniques. In this work, k-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the model and its behavior on the independent dataset. With this validation method, each of a k number of groups has the chance to be divided into training and testing data. The performances of the methods were evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), correlation coefficient (R2), and using graphical indicators. The evaluation of the performance of the datasets obtained using cross-validation was performed in two ways. When the method having the minimum error result was accepted as the most appropriate method, the natural neighbor (NN) gave better results than the other methods (RMSE = 0.142 m, MAE = 0.097 m, NSE = 0.98986, and R2 = 0.99011). On the other hand, it was observed that on average, the GRNN exhibited the best performance (RMSE = 0.185 m, MAE = 0.137 m, NSE = 0.98229, and R2 = 0.98249).

Keywords : Generalized regression neural network (GRNN); Radial basis function neural network (RBFNN); Multiple linear regression (MLR); Interpolation methods; Geoid determination.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )