SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue2The city in its children. Quality of life from a child's perspectiveThe effect of green coffee water content on the properties of roast coffee author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Entramado

Print version ISSN 1900-3803

Abstract

GIRALDO-PAREDES, Holbein. Karl Popper: explanation in the discipline of history. Entramado [online]. 2013, vol.9, n.2, pp.204-211. ISSN 1900-3803.

The following article provides a review of arguments listed in Karl Popper's book titled "The misery of historicism" in which he levels criticism against the historicist concept derived from the philosophical views of authors such as Plato, Hegel, and Marx. In his criticism he resorts to arguments that are epistemological in nature to show that the deductive-nomological model of scientific explanation is not applicable to the discipline of history. In this respect, he refutes one the strongest theses for which he advocated his entire life, namely, that of methodological monism or methodological unification of science; inherited from logical positivism.

Keywords : Deductive nomological model; methodological monism; explanation; history; historicism.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )