SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número1Evaluación del comportamiento de un reactor UASB con diferentes cargas orgánicas provenientes de lactosueroDiseño y evaluación del compostaje como alternativa para el tratamiento de residuos de aditivos en la construcción índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Producción + Limpia

versión impresa ISSN 1909-0455

Resumen

OLMOS VILLALBA, Luis Carlos  y  ODRIGUEZ ACEVEDO, Elizabeth. Technical and economical assessment of power generation technologies firing syngas obtained from biosolid gasification. Rev. P+L [online]. 2014, vol.9, n.1, pp.31-43. ISSN 1909-0455.

Introduction. The wastewater treatment process generates two byproducts biogas and biosolid. Biosolid is sewage sludge which has a high moisture content and low organic material. Currently, the biosolid is utilized as fertilizer to sustainably improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth, however there are some studies that show high heavy metal and pathogens content that turn the use of biosolid into a hazard for other species and the humankind. Objective. This paper shows another way for using this residual byproduct; The paper shows a technical and economical assessment about two power generation technologies as Dual-fuel Engines [DE] and Gas Engines [GE], using the syngas obtained from biosolid gasification as fuel. Materials and methods. In this study the scale-up factor method and the correlation method were used by determination of generation plants and gasification process cost, respectively. The variables studied were: investment cost, Syngas cost, M & O cost and generated energy cost, and the economical assessment was made with the financial factors Net Present Value [NPV] and Internal Rate of Return [IRR] with a project lifetime of 15 years. Result. The main result of this study drew that a generation over 545 kWe with GE technology brings a best profit-earning capacity for the project. Conclusion. The total capital investment of gasification plant and diesel cost must be effectively addressed in order to increase their potential viability of this kind of projects.

Palabras clave : biomass gasification; Dual-fuel Engine; Gas Engine; Syngas.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )