SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue11METHODOLOGY TO GAUGE A FOUR-BAR LINKAGE PROSTHETIC KNEE MECHANISM BASED ON GAIT ANALYSIS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Ingeniería Biomédica

Print version ISSN 1909-9762

Abstract

CRUZ, Antonio Miguel. DISSENT BETWEEN PEER REVIEWERS? DON'T WORRY, ULTIMATELY THE EDITOR HAS THE LAST WORD. Rev. ing. biomed. [online]. 2012, vol.6, n.11, pp.22-29. ISSN 1909-9762.

All of us have at some point submitted a scientific paper for review with the idea of being published in a given journal. Often, the authors experience many barriers to success (achieving publication) when they submit articles for publication. These barriers depend on the quality of the writing itself, on the biases of the peer reviewers, the way you write your cover letter, and the way in which you address and respond to the observations (erroneous or not) emitted by peer reviewers and the editor of the journal. The purpose of this paper is to provide useful pieces of advice on how to publish articles that tackle issues in the health area in high impact journals in the area of Operations Research & Management Sciences.

Keywords : Impact factor; management sciences; operational research; Clinical engineering; Peer-review process.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )