SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 número11METODOLOGÍA PARA DIMENSIONAMIENTO DE MECANISMO POLICÉNTRICO DE RODILLA UTILIZANDO ANÁLISIS DE MARCHA Y ALGORITMOS GENÉTICOS índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Ingeniería Biomédica

versión impresa ISSN 1909-9762

Resumen

CRUZ, Antonio Miguel. DISSENT BETWEEN PEER REVIEWERS? DON'T WORRY, ULTIMATELY THE EDITOR HAS THE LAST WORD. Rev. ing. biomed. [online]. 2012, vol.6, n.11, pp.22-29. ISSN 1909-9762.

All of us have at some point submitted a scientific paper for review with the idea of being published in a given journal. Often, the authors experience many barriers to success (achieving publication) when they submit articles for publication. These barriers depend on the quality of the writing itself, on the biases of the peer reviewers, the way you write your cover letter, and the way in which you address and respond to the observations (erroneous or not) emitted by peer reviewers and the editor of the journal. The purpose of this paper is to provide useful pieces of advice on how to publish articles that tackle issues in the health area in high impact journals in the area of Operations Research & Management Sciences.

Palabras clave : Impact factor; management sciences; operational research; Clinical engineering; Peer-review process.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )