SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 número11METHODOLOGY TO GAUGE A FOUR-BAR LINKAGE PROSTHETIC KNEE MECHANISM BASED ON GAIT ANALYSIS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Ingeniería Biomédica

versão impressa ISSN 1909-9762

Resumo

CRUZ, Antonio Miguel. DISSENT BETWEEN PEER REVIEWERS? DON'T WORRY, ULTIMATELY THE EDITOR HAS THE LAST WORD. Rev. ing. biomed. [online]. 2012, vol.6, n.11, pp.22-29. ISSN 1909-9762.

All of us have at some point submitted a scientific paper for review with the idea of being published in a given journal. Often, the authors experience many barriers to success (achieving publication) when they submit articles for publication. These barriers depend on the quality of the writing itself, on the biases of the peer reviewers, the way you write your cover letter, and the way in which you address and respond to the observations (erroneous or not) emitted by peer reviewers and the editor of the journal. The purpose of this paper is to provide useful pieces of advice on how to publish articles that tackle issues in the health area in high impact journals in the area of Operations Research & Management Sciences.

Palavras-chave : Impact factor; management sciences; operational research; Clinical engineering; Peer-review process.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )