SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 número3Prevalence of hypothyroidism in major psychiatric disorders in hospitalised patients in Montserrat Hospital during the period March to October 2010Mental health determines the quality of life in patients with cancer-related neuropathic pain in Quito, Ecuador, índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría

versão impressa ISSN 0034-7450

rev.colomb.psiquiatr. vol.46 no.3 Bogotá jul./set. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2016.06.002 

Original article

Multiple-victimisation due to armed conflict and emotional distress in the State of Magdalena, Colombia*

Polivictimización por el conflicto armado y sufrimiento emocional en el Departamento del Magdalena, Colombia

Adalberto Campo-Arias a   **   , Adriana R. Sanabria b   , Anyelly Ospino b   , Valeria M. Guerra b   , Beatriz H. Caamaño a  

a Grupo de Investigación Corazón y Diabetes, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia

b Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia

Abstract

Background:

Emotional distress is common in Colombian armed conflict victims. Multiple-victimisation is associated with an increase in emotional distress than victimisation due a single event. However, the association between poly-victimisation and emotional distress among victims of the armed conflict in Colombia has not been documented.

Objective:

To study the association between multiple-victimisation and emotional distress in victims of armed conflict in the State of Magdalena, Colombia.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was designed, with a secondary analysis of registration of the Psychosocial Care Program and Victim Integral Health (PAPSIVI) in the State of Magdalena, from 2013 to 2014. The profile formula grouped demographic variables, victimising events, and a set of symptoms of emotional distress (perceived discrimination, depressive and anxiety-stress). Odds ratio (OR, 95%CI) were established as measures of association.

Results:

A total of 943 people were included, with 67.4% women, and ages between 18 and 94 years (mean 47.9 ±14.2). A total of 109 (11.7%) suffered from multiple victimisation. Multiple victimisation events were associated with more emotional distress, depressive symptoms (OR = 1.5; 95%CI, 1.3-1.8), perceived stigma (OR = 1.3; 95%CI, 1.1-1.5), and anxiety-stress (OR = 1.2; 95%CI 1.0-1.4) than a single event.

Conclusions:

There are more emotional distress in multiple victimisations than in a single victimisation event during armed conflict in this region of Colombia. Further studies are required on this topic.

Key words: Victimisation; Mental aspects; Depressive symptoms; Social stigma; Anxiety; Emotional stress; Cross-sectional study

Resumen

Introducción:

El sufrimiento emocional es frecuente en víctimas del conflicto armado colombiano. La polivictimización se asocia a mayor número de sufrimientos emocionales que la victimización debida un único evento. Sin embargo, hasta la fecha no se ha documentado la asociación entre polivictimización y sufrimiento emocional en víctimas del conflicto armado en Colombia.

Objetivo:

Estudiar la asociación entre polivictimización y sufrimiento emocional en víctimas del conflicto armado del Departamento del Magdalena, Colombia.

Métodos:

Se diseñó un estudio transversal, un análisis secundario del registro del Programa de Atención Psicosocial y Salud Integral a Víctimas (PAPSIVI) del Departamento del Magdalena, 2013-2014. El formulario de caracterización agrupó variables demográficas, eventos victimizantes y un conjunto de manifestaciones de sufrimiento emocional (discriminación percibida, depresión y ansiedad). Se establecieron razones de disparidades como medidas de asociación.

Resultados:

Se incluyó a 943 personas, el 67,4% mujeres, con edad de 18-94 anos (media, 47,9 ± 14,2). Un total de 109 (11,7%) presentaron polivictimización. La polivictimización se asoció a mayor sufrimiento emocional que la victimización por un único evento, síntomas depresivos (odds ratio = 1,5; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,3-1,8), estigmatización percibida (odds ratio = 1,3; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,1-1,5) y ansiedad-estrés (odds ratio = 1,2; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,0-1,4).

Conclusiones:

La polivictimización incrementa el sufrimiento emocional más que la victimización por un único evento en personas víctimas del conflicto armado en esta región colombiana. Es necesario investigar más en esta área.

Palabras-clave: Victimización Aspectos mentales Síntomas depresivos Estigma social Ansiedad Estrés emocional Estudio transversal

Introduction

Poly-victimisation is defined as the simultaneous occurrence or presentation of multiple forms of interpersonal violence.1,2 Undoubtedly, these negative events play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of symptoms related to mental disorders.3,4

Victims of a single event, whether natural or the result of violent human actions, frequently relate emotional distress following the events.5,6 Likewise, it is observed that people who report poly-victimisation relate greater emotional suffering than those who report a single event in a given period.7-11 Consequently, in people who present poly-victimisation, the frequency of emotional problems is higher, as is the probability of meeting the criteria for a mental disorder as a result.12-15

Poly-victimisation is not a one-dimensional phenomenon, but a diverse set of painful or traumatic experiences with unique implications for each group of victims of the internal armed conflict due to material and immaterial losses, lifestyle changes and coping with new challenges or risks.16,17 The internal armed conflict in Colombia is a significant cause of poly-victimisation; in addition to forced displacement, there are other forms of violence such as direct death threats, disappearances of relatives and acquaintances, murders, kidnappings, torture and sexual assaults, thus increasing the sources of suffering.18

Emotional symptoms and potential mental disorder cases are highly frequent among victims of the internal armed conflict in Colombia. In Colombian adults who have fallen victim to the internal armed conflict and been displaced, the prevalence of potential mental disorder cases exceeds 20%.19 However, in the general population, potential cases of mental disorders, anxiety and depression are observed less frequently, reaching 10% when quantified with the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ).20

Poly-victimisation has been studied in other countries, particularly in children and adolescents7-11 and, most recently, among adult men and women in other situations besides those occurring in the context of the Colombian armed conflict.12-15 Poly-victimisation is a more stressful eventuality than re-victimisation, i.e., the repetition of the same situation of victimization7; however, to date, the association between poly-victimisation and emotional suffering among victims of the Colombian armed conflict has not been quantified. A greater frequency and, consequently, a disproportionate number of cases of emotional suffering can be expected among those who report poly-victimisation than those who only present a single victimisation event in the context of the armed conflict.1

In order to meet the needs of the people who have been directly affected by the armed conflict, the Programme for Psychosocial and Integrated Health Care for Victims (PAPSIVI) was created.21 The process began with the registration of the conflict victims, and an instrument was later created to record manifestations of emotional suffering which was consistent with the psychosocial approach protocol for the adoption of comprehensive care, assistance and psychosocial support measures for victims of the armed conflict.22 The naming of potential mental disorders was actively avoided, given the instrument's lack of diagnostic pretensions. Moreover, it is necessary to keep in mind that "diagnosis" is the result of an elaborate analytical process of classifying and explaining a person's emotional suffering, and it can only be performed by professionals with clinical training. Likewise, this approach helps to minimise the possibility of adding another victimisation event, secondary to the stigma, leading to the formal diagnosis of a mental disorder.13

In some situations, the stigmatisation of the victim increases the likelihood of them reporting symptoms of distress that are traditionally related to post-traumatic stress disorder13 and, in the context of the Colombian armed conflict, the displacement situation per se has been stigmatised by various mechanisms or reasons.23 This study quantified the association between poly-victimisation and emotional suffering in the Department of Magdalena to go beyond the simple deduction that "more is worse",1 since interpersonal victimisation presents a different dynamic to victimisation or poly-victimisation due to accidental events or natural disasters.2

The growing implementation of differential care within the Colombian General System of Social Security in Health renders it necessary to have information that allows for prioritisation or special actions with regard to people in a situation of poly-victimisation, as required by the Colombian law for victims of the internal armed conflict.24

The objective of this research is to study the association between poly-victimisation and emotional suffering among victims of the armed conflict in 15 priority municipalities within the Department of Magdalena in the 2013-2014 period.

Methods

A quantitative, analytical, observational and cross-sectional study was designed, for which information was collected from victims of the armed conflict in the Department of Magdalena. For the research, we had permission to review and analyse the information, though this type of research does not pose any risk to the participants, since no interviews are conducted and only digitised materials are reviewed. Furthermore, for the analysis, the names of the participants were omitted and replaced with a code in order to respect confidentiality, as per Ministry of Health Resolution 8430 of 1993.25

Adults over 18 years of age who participated in the victim characterisation process of the priority municipality in the Department of Magdalena were included in this analysis. Cases where interviewers did not record victimising events, did not complete demographic information or did not complete all manifestations of emotional suffering were excluded. Likewise, characterisation sheets that presented errors in the digitisation process which limited their legibility were excluded from the analysis. In the Department of Magdalena, between 2013 and 2014, 5220 victims were officially registered, distributed across the 30 municipalities in the department; however, the greatest concentration was found in half of them. For this analysis, there was a non-probability sample, for convenience, of victims of the armed conflict in 15 municipalities in the Department of Magdalena.

The PAPSIVI characterisation form consolidates demographic information, family characteristics and a set of manifestations of the condition suffered due to victimising events, including emotional suffering.

A group of 15 of the most common manifestations of emotional suffering reported in the studies conducted on victims of victimising events was evaluated. A team of psychologists constructed a characterisation guide, including 31 emotional manifestations that in this clinical context may be interpreted as symptoms of anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress, among others. For this analysis, those that are closely related in theory and appearance to perceived stigma (degradation, helplessness, humiliation, inferiority, feelings of insecurity and shame), the anxiety-stress symptoms listed in the international classifications (aggressiveness, anxiety, fear or permanent state of alert, apathy or disinterest, despair and feeling of vulnerability) and depressive symptoms (cycles of anger and sadness, frequent crying, feeling of loneliness and sadness) were taken into account. This selection was carried out after an exploratory factorial analysis process to extract the items that performed best in the abovementioned three dimensions. Each emotional manifestation was evaluated dichotomously, whether present or absent, at the time of the interview.22

The list of victimising events included death threats, disappearances, forced displacement, murders, kidnappings, torture and various forms of sexual violence. The presence of two or more victimising events perceived by the same person related to the internal armed conflict was considered poly-victimisation.

A univariate descriptive analysis was performed on each of the variables. Frequencies and percentages of the nominal data and mean ± standard deviation of the quantitative data were observed. To explore the association between poly-victimisation (taken as an independent variable) and manifestations of emotional suffering (conceived as dependent variables), odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The associations between poly-victimisation and psychosocial manifestations were adjusted by logistic regression, and demographic variables were taken as covariates or confounding variables. We also performed a factorial analysis using the principal component method to transform and reduce the three groups of manifestations of emotional suffering to a single variable for each one.26 This process was performed because the set of symptoms was not taken as constructs (perceived stigma, anxiety-stress and depressive symptoms) in the initial construction of the measuring instrument, in which case the calculation of Cronbach's alpha would have been sufficient.27

The calculations were performed with the IBM-SPSS Statistics package.28 Adjusted associations that did not include the unit (1.0) in the confidence interval were accepted as significant.29 Goodness-of-fit was determined using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.30

Results

Of the 5220 victims registered in total, 1388 people were interviewed. However, 443 interviews (31.9%) were excluded due to data omission or illegibility following a poor digitisation process. Finally, for this analysis, there was a group of 943 participants that presented complete information.

The participants were between 18 and 94 years old (mean, 47.9 ± 14.2); 881 people (86.0%) were aged between 18 and 64 years and 132 (14.0%) were 65 or older. Other characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characterisation. 

Variable n (%)
Women 636 (67.4)
Men 367 (32.6)
Primary education or lower 694 (73.6)
Secondary or higher 249 (26.4)
Stable partner 688 (73.0)
No stable partner 255 (27.0)
Unstable income 812 (86.1)
Stable income (formal employment) 131 (13.9)
Registered health system users 889 (94.3)
Non-registered users 54(5.7)

As regards the victimising events, rates of 0.2% were observed for kidnapping and sexual violence, with forced displacement reaching 87.9% (Table 2).

Table 2 Victimising events. 

The indicators of emotional suffering ranged from 5.6% feeling degradation to 45.6% sadness (Table 3).

Table 3 Indicators of emotional distress. 

The gross and adjusted associations of poly-victimisation and the indicators studied are shown in Table 4. All adjustments showed adequate Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit.

Table 4 Association between poly-victimisation and emotional distress (gross and adjusted). 

Similarly, in the process of reducing the manifestations of emotional suffering by means of factor analysis, poly-victimisation showed a statistically significant association with manifestations of perceived discrimination (OR = 1.3, 95% CI, 1.1-1.5), anxiety-stress (OR=1.3, 95% CI, 1.1-1.5) and depressive symptoms (OR = 1.6, 95% CI, 1.3-1.9).

Discussion

This study shows that 11.6% of the victims of the internal armed conflict in the Department of Magdalena, Colombia, report poly-victimisation. Poly-victimisation was statistically associated with greater emotional suffering (perceived discrimination, depression and anxiety) than victimisation due to a single event.

In this research we found that poly-victimisation was positively associated with manifestations of emotional suffering, reported as symptoms related to depression and anxiety-stress. These findings are entirely consistent with previous studies conducted in other contexts, which indicated that people with poly-victimisation presented more distress or emotional symptoms on the spectrum of anxiety, depression and stress than those who reported victimisation due to a single event.10-15,31-34 For example, Cuevas et al. observed in a group of 870 women that experiencing poly-victimisation significantly increased the proportion of clinically significant symptoms more than any specific form of violence or a single incident of victimisation.35 Moreover, Hunt et al. showed, in a group of 66 refugees who requested mental health services, that those who reported several traumatic events presented symptoms of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress more frequently than the group that reported a single event of victimisation.36

In this study, it was also observed that poly-victimisation is associated with greater perceived discrimination than victimisation due to a single event. There are no previous studies reporting this association. Nonetheless, it should be taken into account that the victims of the Colombian armed conflict experienced a process of discrediting, the so-called stigma-discrimination complex, generally secondary to the displacement situation.23,37,38 The stigma-discrimination complex in itself not only represents a further stressor for the victims of the armed conflict,23 but also multiplies the chances of them presenting symptoms related to post-traumatic stress disorder subsequent to an additional victimising event.13 It should also be borne in mind that the stigma-discrimination complex, for any condition, trait or situation, represents an access barrier to health services even when the need for services is completely manifest.39

Given that Colombia is moving towards a post-conflict period, comprehensive psychosocial care is needed for all victims of the internal armed conflict, not only with the objective of responding to emotional suffering, but also to break the cycles of violence that culminate in poly-victimisation.40,41 It is also essential to stop the spiral that leads to the poverty and re-victimisation of these groups42-44 and to thus promote individual, family and collective wellbeing, based mainly on community actions.40,45,46 Undoubtedly, caring for victims of an armed conflict is a major challenge for any health system, given the complexity resulting from the intertwining of complex humanitarian and social phenomena that require integrated cross-sector actions.47,48 PAPSIVI must incorporate one additional element to the differential treatment of people in a situation of poly-victimisation.21,24 This is even more true when a significant number of the internal armed conflict victims belong to ethnic, Afro-Colombian and indigenous communities, who face inequalities when it comes to exercising their rights as citizens.49

This research has the strength of qualitatively presenting the association between poly-victimisation and emotional suffering in victims of the internal armed conflict in Colombia. In addition, an advanced statistical analysis was carried out to quantify the associations, which is very rare or exceptional in the reports published by state organisations. However, this analysis has a limitation that is typical of studies that do not employ probability sampling to apply the observations to populations with similar or comparable characteristics.50 The research presents another disadvantage, characteristic of cross-sectional analyses that do not reveal an unambiguous line of causality, of a cause and effect relationship.51 Moreover, for the analysis it was necessary to exclude a significant percentage of the interviewees; however, given that there was a large sample of around 1000 participants, it is possible to minimise several probable biases or errors that could occur due to this loss of information.52

It is concluded that poly-victimisation is a phenomenon experienced by approximately 1 in 10 victims of the internal armed conflict in the Department of Magdalena. Poly-victimisation is associated with greater emotional suffering than victimisation due to a single event. Poly-victimisation should be considered in the comprehensive psychosocial and health care of the victims. Further research is needed in this area during the post-conflict period.

Acknowledgements

To Dr Patricia Serrano, Victims Coordinator, PAPSIVI Magdalena, for kindly obtaining information on the victims.

References

1. Scott-Storey K. Cumulative abuse: do things add up? An evaluation of the conceptualization, operationalization, and methodological approaches in the study of the phenomenon of cumulative abuse. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011;12:135-50. [ Links ]

2. Finkelhor D. Developmental victimology. In: Davis RC, Luirigio AJ, Herma S, editors. Victims of crime. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; 2007. p. 9-34. [ Links ]

3. Seedat S, Stein DJ, Jackson PB, Heeringa SG, Williams DR, Myer L. Life stress and mental disorders in the South African stress and health study. S Afr Med J. 2009;99:375-82. [ Links ]

4. Dias BG, Maddox SA, Klengel T, Ressler KJ. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying learning and the inheritance of learned behaviors. Trend Neurosci. 2015;38:96-107. [ Links ]

5. Porter M, Haslam N. Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;294:602-12. [ Links ]

6. Forbes D, Alkemade N, Waters E, Gibbs L, Gallagher C, Pattison P, et al. The role of anger and ongoing stressors in mental health following a natural disaster. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49:706-13. [ Links ]

7. Finkelhor D, Ormrod RK, Turner HA. Poly-victimization. A neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31:7-26. [ Links ]

8. Finkelhor D, Ormrod RK, Turner HA. Lifetime assessment of poly-victimization in a national sample of children and youth. Child Abuse Negl. 2009;33:403-11. [ Links ]

9. Babchishin LK, Romano E. Evaluating the frequency, co-occurrence, and psychosocial correlates of childhood multiple victimization. Can J Community Mental Health. 2014;33:47-65. [ Links ]

10. Simmons J, Wijma B, Swahnberg K. Lifetime co-occurrence of violence victimisation and symptoms of psychological ill health: a cross-sectional study of Swedish male and female clinical and population samples. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:979. [ Links ]

11. Cortez CP, Sanhueza KV. Experiencias de victimización y polivictimización en jóvenes chilenos. Señales. 2015;9:5-25. [ Links ]

12. Boxer P, Terranova AM. Effects of multiple maltreatment experiences among psychiatrically hospitalized youth. Child Abuse Negl. 2008;32:637-47. [ Links ]

13. Kennedy AC, Bybee D, Greeson MR. Examining cumulative victimization, community violence exposure, and stigma as contributors to PTSD symptoms among high-risk young women. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2014;84:284-94. [ Links ]

14. Moreira FG, Quintana MI, Ribeiro W, Bressan RA, Mello MF, Mari JJ, et al. Revictimization of violence suffered by those diagnosed with alcohol dependence in the general population. BioMed Res Int. 2015:e805424. [ Links ]

15. Palm A, Danielsson I, Skalkidou A, Olofsson N, Högberg U. Violence victimization-a watershed for young women's mental and physical health. Eur J Public Health. 2016 [Epub ahead of print]. [ Links ]

16. Shultz JM, Garfin DR, Espinel Z, Araya R, Oquendo MA, Wainberg ML, et al. Internall displaced victims of armed conflict in Colombia: the trajectory and trauma signature of force migration. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16:1-16. [ Links ]

17. Adams ZW, Moreland A, Cohen JR, Lee RC, Hanson RF, Danielson CK, et al. Polyvictimization: latent profiles and mental health outcomes in a clinical sample of adolescents. Psychol Violence. 2016;6:145-55. [ Links ]

18. Arias BE. Salud mental y violencia política. Atender al enfermo psiquiátrico o reconocer al sujeto de la micropolítica. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2013;42:275-82. [ Links ]

19. Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC, Herazo E. Prevalencia de síntomas, posibles casos y trastornos mentales en víctimas del conflicto armado interno en situación de desplazamiento en Colombia: una revisión sistemática. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2014;43:177-85. [ Links ]

20. Minsalud-Colciencias. Encuesta nacional de salud mental. Bogotá: Javegraf; 2015. [ Links ]

21. Programa de atención psicosocial y salud integral a víctimas (PAPSIVI). Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud y de la Protección Social; 2016. Available from: http://www.minsalud.gov.co/proteccionsocial/Paginas/Victimas_PAPSIVI.aspx. [ Links ]

22. Protocolo de abordaje psicosocial para la adopción de medidas de atención integral, atención y acompañamiento psicosocial a las víctimas del conflicto armado. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social y Organización Internacional para las Migraciones; 2011. Available from: http://corporacionvinculos.org/home/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Anexo-1.-Fundamentos-legales-y-marco-normativo-del-Protocolo.pdf. [ Links ]

23. Campo-Arias A, Herazo E. Estigma y salud mental en personas víctimas del conflicto armado interno colombiano en situación de desplazamiento forzado. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2014;43:212-7. [ Links ]

24. Ley 1448 (junio 10) por la cual se dictan medidas de atención, asistencia y reparación integral a las víctimas del conflicto armado interno y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: Congreso de la República de Colombia; 2011. [ Links ]

25. Resolución 008430 por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud de Colombia; 1993. [ Links ]

26. Katz MH. Multivariable analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. [ Links ]

27. Oviedo HC, Campo-Arias A. Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2005;34:572-80. [ Links ]

28. IBM-SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk: SPSS Inc.; 2013. [ Links ]

29. Scotto MG, Tobías-Garcés A. Interpretando correctamente en salud pública estimaciones puntuales, intervalos de confianza y contrastes de hipótesis. Salud Publica Mex. 2003;45:506-11. [ Links ]

30. Hosmer DW, Taber S, Lemeshow S. The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: a case study. Am J Public Health 1991;81:1630-5. [ Links ]

31. Michultka D, Blanchard EB, Kalous T. Responses to civilian war experiences predictors of psychologica functioning and coping. J Trauma Stress. 1998;11:571-7. [ Links ]

32. Kozaric-Kovacic D, Ljubin T, Grappe M. Comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence in displaced persons. Croat Med J. 2000;41:173-8. [ Links ]

33. Sabina C, Straus MA. Polyvictimization by dating partners and mental health among US college students. Violence Victim. 2008;23:667-82. [ Links ]

34. Nilsson D, Dahlstrõm Õ, Priebe G, Svedin CG. Polytraumatization in an adult national sample and its association with psychological distress and self-esteem. Brain Behav. 2015;5:e00298. [ Links ]

35. Cueva CA, Sabina C, Picard EH. Interpersonal victimization patterns and psychopathology among Latino women: results from the SALAS study. Psychol Trauma. 2010;2:296-306. [ Links ]

36. Teodorescu DS, Heir T, Hauff E, Wentzel-Larsen T, Lien L. Mental health problems and post-migration stress among multi-traumatized refugees attending outpatient clinics upon resettlement to Norway. Scand J Psychol. 2012;53:316-32. [ Links ]

37. Campo-Arias A, Herazo E. El complejo estigma-discriminación asociado a trastorno mental como factor de riesgo de suicidio. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2015;44:243-50. [ Links ]

38. Roldan I. El estado actual de las víctimas en Colombia: la búsqueda de la verdad. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2007;36:41-66. [ Links ]

39. Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC, Herazo E. Estigma: barrera de acceso a servicios en salud mental. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2014;43:162-7. [ Links ]

40. Rodríguez A. Atención psicosocial y en salud mental; claves para el tránsito en Colombia de la confrontación armada a la política. Rev Salud Bosque. 2015;5:5-7. [ Links ]

41. Grych J, Swan S. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of interpersonal violence: introduction to the special issue on interconnections among different types of violence. Psychol Violence. 2012;2:105-10. [ Links ]

42. Moya J, López-Moreno S. Changes in perceived health in war-displaced population, Ayacucho, Peru: 1980-2004. Cienc Saude Colet. 2011;16:1699-708. [ Links ]

43. Herrera-Lopez V, Cruzado L. Estrés postraumático y comorbilidad asociada en víctimas de la violencia política de una comunidad campesina de Huancavelica, Perú. 2013. Rev Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2014;77:144-59. [ Links ]

44. Romero-Acosta K, Contreras EM. Revisión teórica sobre el post-conflicto: una oportunidad para empoderar a mujeres víctimas de desplazamiento. Cult Educ Soc. 2015;6: 79-92. [ Links ]

45. Buitrago MT. La rehabilitación basada en la comunidad: un recuento histórico internacional, nacional y distrital, 1979-2004. Invest Enferm. 2008;10:39-61. [ Links ]

46. Pérez P, Fernández A. Violencia y trauma: del trabajo comunitario a la psicoterapia. Guías de procesos y programas integrados. Bogotá: Irredentos Libros; 2015. [ Links ]

47. Gómez GM, Arias Astaiza GM, Minayo MC. Las migraciones forzadas por la violencia: el caso de Colombia. Cienc Saude Colet. 2008;13:1649-60. [ Links ]

48. Franco S, Suarez CM, Naranjo CB, Báez LC, Rozo P. The effects of the armed conflict on the life and health in Colombia. Cienc Saude Colet. 2006;11:1247-58. [ Links ]

49. Diez AV, Álvarez G. La necesidad de un enfoque multinivel en epidemiología: desafíos conceptuales y metodológicos. In: Haro JA, editor. Epidemiología sociocultural. Un diálogo en torno a su sentido, métodos y alcances. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial, Centro de Estudios en Salud y Sociedad; 2011. p.67-87. [ Links ]

50. Kamangar F, Islami F. Sample size calculation for epidemiologic studies: principles and methods. Arch Iran Med. 2013;16:295-300. [ Links ]

51. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl. 1:S144-50. [ Links ]

52. Bacchetti P.Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternatives. BMC Med. 2010;8:17. [ Links ]

* Please cite this article as: Campo-Arias A, Sanabria AR, Ospino A, Guerra VM, Caamaño BH. Polivictimización por el conflicto armado y sufrimiento emocional en el Departamento del Magdalena, Colombia. Rev Colomb Psiquiat. 2017;46:147-153.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work centre on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Received: April 01, 2016; Accepted: June 22, 2016

** Corresponding author. E-mail address: acampoa@unimagdalena.edu.co (A. Campo-Arias). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcpeng.2016.06.002

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License