SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.68 número3Detección de anticuerpos IgA antitransglutaminasa tisular (IgA-TGT) en niños con diabetes mellitus tipo 1Nadar con la menstruación: un estudio cualitativo en nadadoras de élite índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina

versión impresa ISSN 0120-0011

rev.fac.med. vol.68 no.3 Bogotá jul./set. 2020  Epub 23-Nov-2020

https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n3.75081 

Original papers

Huber opposition transfer for improving hypoplastic thumb: results of a case series

Transferencia de Huber para mejorar la oposición del pulgar hipoplásico: resultados de una serie de casos

Enrique Vergara-Amador1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-8338

Yimer Castellar-Torres1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-3373

1 Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogotá Campus - Faculty of Medicine - Orthopedics and Traumatology Specialty - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia.


Abstract

Introduction:

Abductor digiti minimi transfer (also known as Huber opposition transfer) allows restoring thumb opposition. This method has several advantages over other opposition transfer techniques, as it replaces the intrinsic muscles of the thumb with another intrinsic muscle of the hypothenar region, thus improving the volume of thenar eminence. It is used preferably in thumb hypoplasia types II and III.

Objective:

To describe the functional results of a series of patients with thumb hypoplasia who underwent Huber opposition transfer.

Materials and methods:

Descriptive, observational study conducted in 11 patients with thumb hypoplasia who underwent Huber opposition transfer and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Furthermore, some of these patients had undergone pollicization due to their type of hypoplasia.

Results:

The average age at the time of surgery was 35 months and the average follow-up period was 15.4 months. Average opposition function, according to the modified Kapandji index, improved from 1.63 (range 1-2) to 3.72 (range 2-4).

Conclusion:

Good functional results were obtained using this technique, achieving overall improvement in opposition function according to the Kapandji index. In 9 patients, the index increased to grade 4 and in 1 it went from grade 1 to grade 3; in 1 case, improvement was not significant (grade 1 to grade 2), since the patient presented with finger stiffness associated with VACTERL. Huber opposition transfer allows achieving good functional opposition results in patients with thumb hypoplasia.

Keywords: Thumb; Tendon Transfer; Congenital Abnormalities; Hand (MeSH)

Resumen

Introducción.

La transferencia del abductor digiti minimi o transferencia de Huber permite restaurar la oposición del pulgar y presenta varias ventajas sobre otras técnicas de transferencias de oposición, ya que reemplaza musculatura intrínseca del pulgar por otro músculo intrínseco de la región hipotenar, lo que mejora el volumen de la eminencia tenar. Este procedimiento es usado preferiblemente en los tipos II y III de hipoplasia de pulgar.

Objetivo.

Describir los resultados funcionales de la transferencia de Huber en una serie de pacientes con hipoplasia de pulgar.

Materiales y métodos.

Estudio observacional descriptivo realizado en 11 pacientes con hipoplasia de pulgar operados mediante la técnica Huber y a quienes se les había realizado un seguimiento mínimo de 6 meses. Además, algunos habían sido sometidos a pulgariza-ción debido al tipo de hipoplasia que presentaban.

Resultados.

La edad promedio de los participantes al momento de la cirugía fue de 35 meses y el tiempo promedio de seguimiento fue de 15.4 meses. El promedio de la función de oposición, según la escala modificada de Kapandji mejoró de 1.63 (intervalo de 1-2) a 3.72 (intervalo 2-4).

Conclusión.

Se obtuvieron buenos resultados funcionales al emplear esta técnica, logrando una mejora general de la oposición según la escala de Kapandji: en 9 pacientes aumentó a grado 4 y en otro pasó de 1 a 3; solo en 1 caso la mejora no fue significativa (grado 1 a 2) dado que el paciente presentaba rigidez de los dedos asociada a VACTERL. La transferencia de Huber es una técnica que permite obtener buenos resultados funcionales de oposición para el pulgar hipoplásico.

Palabras clave: Pulgar; Transferencia tendinosa; Anomalías congénitas; Mano (DeCS)

Introduction

Thumb hypoplasia is a congenital abnormality that, according to the Blauth classification, can present with the complete absence of the thumb or different degrees of affectation ranging from type I to type V. This classification is useful as it not only describes the degree of hypoplasia but also guides treatment and prognosis.1

Thumb hypoplasia has an incidence ranging from 3.4 to 16 cases per 10 000 births and is often bilateral (2060% of cases) and accompanied by abnormalities in the limbs, spine, and other organs. This condition can occur within the VACTERL association, a group of birth defects that tend to co-occur and mainly affect parts of the body such as vertebrae, anal atresia, heart, trachea, esophagus, kidney, and limbs.2,3

The opposing movement of the thumb, which is particularly important for the correct functioning of the hand as it supports pincer grasp movements, is often affected in thumb hypoplasia due to atrophy or absence of the thenar muscles.

Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) transfer is a technique proposed by Eugen Huber in 1921 and used to restore the opposing movement of the thumb in patients with median nerve palsy.4 In theory, this method has advantages over other types of opposing transfers, since it replaces the intrinsic muscle of the deficient thumb with a muscle from the hypothenar region, which also helps to increase the volume and improve the appearance of the atrophied thenar eminence.5 This technique is often used in hypoplasia types II and type III.

Consequently, the aim of the present work was to describe the functional results obtained with the ADM transfer, also known as Huber transfer, in patients with thumb hypoplasia.

Materials and methods

This is a descriptive and retrospective observational study conducted in patients with thumb hypoplasia who underwent Huber opposition transfer to improve the function of their thumbs. Some of these patients had undergone pollicization because of the type of hypoplasia they presented.

The initial sample was composed of 14 patients with the same number of thumbs operated. However, patients that had undergone more surgeries to improve thumb opposition or other congenital malformations of the hand that altered its functionality and who could not be followed for at least 6 months or contacted for reassessment were excluded. The final sample consisted of 11 individuals.

The variables evaluated were age, sex, laterality, classification (according to Blauth), abnormalities of the contralateral thumb, additional surgeries, follow-up time, assessment of thumb opposition, and instability of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the thumb.

Opposition of the thumb was evaluated based on a modification of the Kapandji index,6 a widely used instrument that assesses thumb opposition based on where on their hand the patient is able to touch with the tip of their thumb and that is very practical to implement in children; it should be noted that the original version of the instrument has a score from 1 to 10. In the modified version used for the present work, the values ranged from 0 to 4, and the equivalencies were very similar depending on the location reached by the tip of the thumb: 1 radial side of the middle phalanx of the index finger; 2 radial side of the distal phalanx of the index finger; 3 tip of the index finger; 4 tip of the little finger (only this value changed and is equivalent to Kapandji's score 6).

This is a retrospective study that did not require performing any new procedure on the participants. Participants' anonymity was kept at all times. The patients' data were obtained after their legal guardian signed an informed consent. This work was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia through Minutes 010-159-18 of June 15, 2018, and followed the ethical principles for research on human beings established in the Declaration of Helsinki7 and Resolution 8430 of 1993 of the Ministry of Health of Colombia.8

Procedure

Figures 1, 2, and 3 show the details of the technique. A slightly curved incision was made over the ulnar edge of the hand, going from the base of the little finger to the pisiform bone. ADM was located and released from its insertion; the muscle was lifted, and its origin was left intact in the proximal side. On some occasions, it was possible to visualize the nerve branch of the ulnar nerve that enters deep into the base of the muscle.

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 1 Incision on the ulnar edge of the hand.  

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 2 Dissection of the abductor digiti minimi muscle  

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 3 Harvest of abductor digiti minimi muscle.  

Figures 4 and 5 show the second incision made in the dorsal and radial side of the MCP joint of the thumb, which was used to create a subcutaneous tunnel, first with scissors and then with Kelly clamps. This tunnel ran from the origin of the ADM in the pisiform bone to the second incision in the MCP joint of the thumb; it had to be wide enough to allow adequate movement of the ADM over the superficial palmar fascia. The muscle was transferred through the tunnel to the second incision, and the insertion of the abductor pollicis brevis on the dorsum of the proximal phalanx of the thumb and the dorsal capsule of the MPC joint was sutured with 4/0 polypropylene. On several occasions, it was necessary to open the first web space and reconstruct the ulnar collateral ligament of the MPC joint because it was unstable.

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 4 Transfer of the abductor digiti minimi muscle through a subcutaneous tunnel to the thumb.  

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 5 Suture of the abductor digiti minimi muscle at the insertion of the abductor pollicis brevis on the dorsum of the proximal phalanx of the thumb and the dorsal capsule of the metacarpophalangeal joint.  

The average age of the patients analyzed at the time of surgery was 35 months (range 28-60 months), with a median of 30 months, and average follow-up time of 15.4 months (range 6-60 months); 54% of the patients were male. There were 3 cases of hypoplasia type II and 2 cases of hypoplasia type III; the other 6 cases had undergone pollicization. Moreover, 5 patients had undergone reconstruction of the MPC joint of the thumb, of which 2 presented with hypoplasia type IIIA and 3 with hypoplasia type II. Regarding laterality, 6 patients presented difficulty in the right hand and 5 in the left hand.

According to the modified Kapandji index, the average of the opposing function of the thumb before surgery was 1.63 (interval of 1-2), increasing to 3.72 (interval 2-4) after surgery. Figures 6 and 7 show the results for 2 patients.

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 6 Pre-operative assessment (type I) and satisfactory post-operative outcome (type IV). 

Source: Document obtained during the study.

Figure 7 Abductor digiti minimi transfer at 18 months with type IV result on modified Kapandji index. → Abductor digiti minimi in the thenar region. 

In none of the cases there were any immediate postoperative complications or the need to perform additional surgical procedures.

Discussion

Thumb hypoplasia is a pathology that alters thumb function and, consequently, of the hand, as it hinders opposition and affects dexterity. Thumb hypoplasia type I, and sometimes type II, does not require any specific management, but hypoplasia type IIIA, and some type II cases, require surgical treatment to reconstruct the finger; some of these procedures are transfers to improve thumb opposition as the technique described by Huber. In type IIIB, IV, and V, pollicization is usually performed.9,10

The literature reports some studies that assess the Huber transfer method,11,12 but they do not have an adequate and objective evaluation of the results obtained in the procedures. Given the inherent difficulty of carrying out studies with young children, especially under the age of 3, assessment with the Kapandji index may not be possible, altering the evaluation. In these cases, making drawings or marking points so that the child can reach them with the thumb is recommended, and the help of the parents is necessary for achieving this.

The rotation of the ADM, which arises from the pisiform bone, can produce compression of the ulnar nerve, since the transferred muscle is located on the Guyon's canal. This finding, reported by Cawrse & Sammut,13 is known as a rare complication that forces the reversal of muscle transfer. For this reason, and in order to give greater length to the transferred muscle, some authors remove the proximal ADM muscle from the pisiform bone, the flexor retinaculum and the flexor carpi ulnaris.12-14 In the present series, this complication was not observed and neither was the transfer of the ADM as a myocutaneous flap,15,16 which is more useful in children with greater atrophy of the tissues in the thenar region.

The participants in the present study had good functional results with the Huber technique after their thumb-opposition function improved: in 9 patients, it increased to type IV and in another it went from I to III; only in 1 case it did not improve significantly (type I to II) because the patient had a stiffness of the fingers associated with a VAC-TERL. Finally, good stability of the MPC joint was achieved.

The small size of the sample was one of the limitations of the present study due to the type of pathology analyzed.

Conclusions

The findings prove that the Huber technique is an effective therapeutic option that has the advantage of using an intrinsic hand muscle with a similar function. It also guarantees a better aesthetic appearance by filling the thenar region and allows good functional opposition results for the hypoplastic thumb, which are very similar to those described with other techniques such as the flexor digitorum superficialis lasso tendon transfer.17

Acknowledgements

None stated by the authors.

References

1. James MA, Mccarroll HR, Manske PR. Characteristics of patients with hypoplastic thumbs. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(1):104-13. http://doi.org/fjbrpx. [ Links ]

2. Hostin R, James MA. Reconstruction of thee hypoplastic thumb. Journal of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. 2004;4(4):275-90. http://doi.org/drk66t. [ Links ]

3. Kim J, Kim P, Hui CC. The VACTERL association: lessons from the Sonic hedgehog pathway. Clin Genet. 2001;59(5):306-15. http://doi.org/b4v3wd. [ Links ]

4. Huber E. Relief operation in the case of paralysis of the median nerve. 1921. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(1):35-7. http://doi.org/fp8ndn. [ Links ]

5. Wall LB, Patel A, Roberts S, Goldfarb CA. Long-Term Outcomes of Huber Opposition Transfer for Augmenting Hypoplastic Thumb Function. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42 (8):657.e1-7. http://doi.org/dhfz. [ Links ]

6. Kapandji A. Clinical test of apposition and counter-apposition of the thumb. Ann Chir Main. 1986;5(1):67-73. http://doi.org/cp3s5r. [ Links ]

7. World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: 64th WMA General Assembly; 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 23]. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/2rJdF3M . [ Links ]

8. Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 8430 de 1993 (octubre 4): Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Bogotá D.C.: octubre 4 de 1993. [ Links ]

9. Light T, Gaffey JL. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(3):474-9. http://doi.org/b22k3c. [ Links ]

10. Vergara-Amador EM. Hipoplasia del pulgar. Presentación clínica y reconstruccion. Rev Fac Med. 2008;56(1):33-42. [ Links ]

11. Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr. Abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in congenital radial dysplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3(6):552-9. http://doi.org/dhf3. [ Links ]

12. Ogino T, Minami A, Fukuda K. Abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Br. 1986; 11(3):372-7. http://doi.org/bcbjb5. [ Links ]

13. Cawrse NH, Sammut D. A modification in technique of abductor digiti minimi (Huber) opponensplasty. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(3):233-7. http://doi.org/cn7f3q. [ Links ]

14. Littler JW, Cooley SG. Opposition of the thumb and its restoration by abductor digiti quinti transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:1389-96. [ Links ]

15. Ishida O, Ikuta Y, Sunagawa T, Ochi M. Abductor digiti minimi usculocutaneous island flap as an opposition transfer: A case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(1):130-2. http://doi.org/dvv5fc. [ Links ]

16. Upton J, Taghinia AH. Abductor digiti minimi myocutaneous flap for opponensplasty in congenital hypoplastic thumbs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1807-11. http://doi.org/dtnbt2. [ Links ]

17. Vuillermin C, Butler L, Lake A, Ezaki M, Oishi S. Flexor digitorum superficialis opposition transfer for augmenting function in types II and IIIA thumb hypoplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(2):244-9. http://doi.org/f79ttd. [ Links ]

Vergara-Amador E, Castellar-Torres Y. Huber opposition transfer for improving hypoplastic thumb: results of a case series. Rev. Fac. Med. 2020;68(3):352-5. English. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n3.75081.

Vergara-Amador E, Castellar-Torres Y. [Transferencia de Huber para mejorar la oposición del pulgar hipoplásico: resultados de una serie de casos]. Rev. Fac. Med. 2020;68(3):352-5. English. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.

Conflicts of interest None stated by the authors.

Funding None stated by the authors.

Received: September 23, 2018; Accepted: February 10, 2019

*Corresponding author: Enrique Vergara-Amador. Especialidad de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Carrera 30 No. 45-03, building: 471, office: 177. Telephone number: +57 1 3165000, ext.: 15107. Bogotá D.C. Colombia. Email: enriquevergaramd@gmail.com.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License