SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue4Cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathyTakotsubo. The great imitator of acute myocardial infarction author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Acta Medica Colombiana

Print version ISSN 0120-2448

Acta Med Colomb vol.44 no.4 Bogotá Oct./Dec. 2019

https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2019.1301 

Cases presentation

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS)

Gustavo Adolfo Domínguez-Ramíreza  * 

Paola María Blanco-Pertuzb 

Guillermo Andrés Herrera-Ruedac 

a Médico General. Santa Marta (Colombia).

b Médico General, Universidad del Magdalena. Santa Marta (Colombia).

c Residente tercer año de Medicina Interna, Universidad Industrial de Santander. Bucaramanga (Colombia).


Abstract

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a diagnosis of exclusion which should be proposed in cases where there is microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury. It is associated with mutations which cause dysregulation of the complement system and implies an adverse prognosis and a high risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. Following, we present the case of a patient with aHUS, highlighting the effect and importance of biologic therapy with the monoclonal antibody eculizumab. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2019.1301).

Key words: atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome; complement activation; thrombotic microangiopathies; chronic renal failure; monoclonal antibodies

Resumen

El síndrome hemolítico urémico atípico (SHUa) constituye un diagnóstico de exclusión que debe plantearse ante la presencia de anemia hemolítica microangiopática, trombocitopenia y lesión renal aguda. Está asociado con mutaciones que provocan una disregulación del sistema del complemento e implica un pronóstico adverso y alto riesgo de progresión a enfermedad renal crónica. A continuación, presentamos el caso de un paciente con SHUa resaltando el efecto e importancia de la terapia biológica con el anticuerpo monoclonal eculizumab. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2019.1301).

Palabras clave: síndrome hemolítico urémico atípico; activación de complemento; microangiopatías trombóticas; fallo renal crónico; anticuerpos monoclonales

Introduction

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an infrequent entity characterized by the triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and acute kidney injury. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, ruling out Shiga toxin-producing Eschericia Coli (STEC) infection (usually serotype O157:H7, related to classic or typical hemolytic-uremic syndrome) and other secondary causes of thrombotic microangiopathy, including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). The annual incidence of aHUS is estimated to be two cases per million inhabitants in the United States, with a reported prevalence of 3.3 cases per million in patients under the age of 18 1. The disease is more common in children under the age of 18 (60 vs. 40%), with a similar distribution between the sexes 2. In general, it has a poor prognosis, with a high risk of morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated within the first year. In addition, approximately 65% of individuals will develop chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis within three to five years of diagnosis 3. It is thought that the pathogenesis of aHUS lies in a dysregulation of the complement system due to mutations of the genes which code its proteins, such as factor H, factor I, protein C3, and membrane cofactor CD46 4. Beginning in 2011, the FDA approved the monoclonal antibody eculizumab as the treatment of choice for aHUS, significantly modifying the prognosis of these patients 5. Thus, this article emphatically explains the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion in order to benefit the patients with the efficacy and safety of prompt initiation of biological therapy and thus avoid adverse outcomes.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old male patient was admitted due to a three-day history of approximately 10 liquid stools per day, nonbilious vomiting, diffuse abdominal pain, jaundice and facial edema. On the initial physical exam, he had the following vital signs: BP 210/123 mmHg, HR 112 bpm, RR 24 bpm, SpO2 88%, T 36.8°C, and Glasgow 13/15. He was encephalopathic with grade 3 edema in his lower extremities, abdominal ascites with wall edema, generalized crepitus, inter and subcostal retractions, markedly jaundiced conjunctivas and a history of anuria in the last two days. Parenteral management of the hypertension was begun with sodium nitroprusside, and he was given supplementary oxygen by nasal cannula and empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment (meropenem plus vancomycin) due to suspected sepsis (3 points on Quick-SOFA). The admission paraclinical exams showed severe hemolytic anemia, given the presence of mixed hyperbilirubinemia, frankly elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and evidence of schistocytosis (++) on the peripheral blood smear (PBS). In addition, there was severe thrombocytopenia and significant elevation of nitrogen compounds, compatible with acute kidney injury (AKI) (AKIN 3) (Table 1). He was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to worsening oxygenation indices, where acute pulmonary edema in the interstitial phase was confirmed, and non-invasive mechanical ventilation was begun, with subsequent hemodialysis due to signs of uremia and fluid overload.

Table 1 Admission labs. 

The patient persisted with severe bicytopenia despite transfusion therapy and pulses of methylprednisolone (1 gr IV every 24 hours). Polycultures and direct Coombs were negative, as well as IgM antibodies for dengue and leptospirosis, with no evidence of blood parasites on a thick blood smear. Expansive diagnostic studies did not indicate autoimmunity (Table 2). Of note were diminished complement levels. Histopathology of the bone marrow showed adequate hematopoiesis of the three blood lines, without abnormal cell populations. A hematology consult considered that he would benefit from therapeutic plasma exchange, so he underwent 17 plasmapheresis sessions, with an adequate clinical response. An ADAMTS13 assay was performed to rule out TTP, with no evidence of enzyme deficiency (13.7% activity).

Table 2 Autoimmune profile. 

Given the foregoing, a medical committee of attending specialists in critical care, internal medicine and hematology determined that the patient fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for aHUS. Treatment was begun with eculizumab, 900 mg IV weekly for four weeks as the initiation phase, followed by 1,200 mg IV every 14 days as maintenance. He received the first dose in the hospital with a positive response, was discharged and continued outpatient treatment, with a marked reduction in hemolytic activity and recovery of the residual kidney function (Table 3).

Table 3 Follow-up labs at the end of the eculizumab initiation phase. 

Discussion

The prompt diagnosis of aHUS, with early initiation of biological treatment, is a challenge in the emergency context, given the high risk of progression to advanced chronic kidney disease. The simultaneous occurrence of non-immune microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury make up the diagnostic triad. Hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL, elevated serum LDH, a notable decrease in serum haptoglobin levels and the presence of schistocytes on the PBS, without a positive direct Coombs, confirm the anemic syndrome mediated by microangiopathic hemolysis 6. In addition, hypocomplementemia was seen in our case; however, this finding is not very sensitive or specific, being reported in only 30-50% of cases 7,8. While it is true that the initial clinical picture of the patient in this case suggested infectious gastroenteritis, no enterobacteria were isolated. It should be emphasized that approximately 37% of individuals with aHUS may have gastrointestinal manifestations, often diarrhea (which may be bloody), nausea, vomiting, colitis and abdominal pain, which does not exclude the diagnosis 9,10. On the other hand, ADAMTS13 (plasma disintegrin) activity was not diminished, ruling out a diagnosis of TTP, which is characterized by less than 5% enzyme activity. A study of 214 patients with thrombotic microangiopathy showed that a severely low platelet count (<30 x 103/mm3) with serum creatinine <2.25 mg/dL was commonly found in 157 of 160 patients with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, which suggests that kidney damage is usually not severe in TTP, with platelet deficiency being a more florid finding. This could be useful in differentiating it from aHUS 1,11,12.

Although plasma exchange was the main treatment method for managing aHUS since 1980, complement dysregulation and thrombotic microangiopathy persisted with this option, with a 65% rate of progression to advanced kidney disease during the first year after diagnosis, in spite of treatment 13. In contrast, the prognosis of patients with aHUS has significantly improved since the approval of eculizumab as the treatment of choice in 2011. Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody which binds with high affinity to complement protein C5, preventing the terminal formation of anaphylatoxin C5a and the membrane attack complex (C5b-C9), thus inhibiting the proinflammatory and cytolytic effects of this system. The evidence suggests that after the initiation phase, the mean time for reaching a normal platelet count and serum LDH level was 7 and 28 days, respectively. Likewise, 75% of patients reached a hemoglobin level above 10 g/L in week 26 of treatment, and 80% of those who required renal replacement therapy and began treatment with eculizumab in the first month after diagnosis were able to discontinue hemodialysis, with a mean improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) greater than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 at week 27 14,15. In our particular case, an increase of GFR up to 27.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 was achieved approaching the first 30 days of treatment, with hemoglobin greater than 9 g/dL and a platelet count greater than 100 x 103/mm3. Most patients tolerate this medication well, and it is recommended that patients be immunized against Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and type B Haemophilus influenzae at least two weeks prior to beginning the biological agent, given the increased susceptibility to encapsulated bacteria16,17).

Conclusions

Eculizumab is a well-tolerated treatment which, when begun early, is associated with a significant reduction in thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with aHUS, producing a marked reduction in the rate of progression to chronic kidney disease and the need for dialysis. Thus, prompt detection by ruling out STEC infection and TTP is fundamental for positively impacting the serious morbidity and mortality associated with this syndrome.

References

1. Yoshida Y, Kato H, Nangaku. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Renal Replacement Therapy. 2017;3(5). [ Links ]

2. Sullivan M, Erlic Z, Hoffmann MM, Arbeiter K, Patzer L, Budde K, et al. Epidemiological approach to identifying genetic predispositions for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Ann Hum Genet. 2010;74(1): 17-26. [ Links ]

3. Kavanagh D, Goodship TH & Richards. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. In Seminars in nephrology. 2013, November; 33(6): 508-530. [ Links ]

4. Roldán-Tabares MD & Ruiz-Mejía. C Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: role of the genetic profile. Medicina Interna de México. 2018; 34(3): 394-402. [ Links ]

5. Kaplan BS, Ruebner RL, Spinale JM & Copelovitch L. Current treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Intractable & rare diseases research. 2014; 3(2): 34-45. [ Links ]

6. Campistol JM, Arias M, Ariceta G, Blasco M, Espinosa M, Grinyó JM & Rodríguez de Córdoba S. Actualización en síndrome hemolítico urémico atípico: diagnóstico y tratamiento: Documento de consenso. Nefrología. 2013;33(1): 27-45. [ Links ]

7. Zuckerman R, Asif A, Costanzo EJ & Vachharajani T. Complement activation in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and scleroderma renal crisis: a critical analysis of pathophysiology. Brazilian Journal of Nephrology. 2018; 40(1):77-81. [ Links ]

8. Sridharan M, Go RS, & Willrich MA. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: Review of clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Journal of immunological methods. 2018; 461: 15-22. [ Links ]

9. Kato H , Nangaku M, Hataya H, Sawai T, Ashida A, Kagami. Clinical guides for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in Japan. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology. 2016; 20(4): 536-543. [ Links ]

10. Córdoba JP, Contreras KM, Larrarte C, Espitaleta Z, González LE, Ibarra M & Prada M. Síndrome hemolítico urémico atípico, revisión de la literatura y documento de consenso. Enfoque diagnóstico y tratamiento. Revista Colombiana de Nefrología. 2015; 2(1): 19-40. [ Links ]

11. Coppo P, Schwarzinger M, Buffet M, Wynckel A, Clabault K, Presne C, et al. Predictive features of severe acquired ADAMTS13 deficiency in idiopathic thrombotic microangiopathies: the French TMA reference center experience. PLoS One. 2010 Apr; 23(5): e10208. [ Links ]

12. Gulleroglu K, Fidan K, Hançer VS, Bayrakci U, Baskin E, & Soylemezoglu O. Neurologic involvement in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and successful treatment with eculizumab. Pediatric Nephrology. 2013; 28(5): 827-830. [ Links ]

13. Legendre C M, Licht C, Muus P, Greenbaum LA, Babu S, Bedrosian C & Eitner F. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-ure-mic syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013; 368(23): 2169-2181. [ Links ]

14. Licht C, Greenbaum LA, Muus P, et al. Efficacy and safety of eculizimab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome from 2-year extension of phase 2 studies. Kidney Int. 2015; 87: 1061-1073. [ Links ]

15. Berger BE. (2018). Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a syndrome in need of clarity. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2019; (3): 338-347. [ Links ]

16. Sethi SK. Rohatgi S, Dragon-Durey MA, Raghunathan V, Dhaliwal M, Rawat A, & Kher V. Eculizumab for atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome in India: First report from India and the challenges faced. Indian journal of nephrology. 2017;27(1):58-61. [ Links ]

17. McNamara LA, Topaz N, Wang X, Hariri S, Fox L, & MacNeil JR. High risk for invasive meningococcal disease among patients receiving eculizumab (Soliris) despite receipt of meningococcal vaccine. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2017; 66(27): 734. [ Links ]

Licencia Creative Commons

Received: March 20, 2019; Accepted: October 30, 2019

* Correspondence: Dr. Gustavo Adolfo Domínguez-Ramírez. Santa Marta (Colombia) E-mail: gustavo.dr018@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License