Spanish (pdf)
Article in xml format
Article references
Automatic translation
Send this article by e-mail
Cited by SciELO 
Cited by Google 
Similars in
SciELO 
Similars in Google 
Permalink
Holguín VA, Ortiz Grisalez S, Velasco Navia A, Mora-Delgado J. 2015. Evaluación multicriterio de 44 introducciones de Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray en Candelaria, Valle del Cauca [Multi-criteria evaluation of 44 introductions of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray in Candelaria, Valle del Cauca]. Rev Med Vet Zoot. 62(2): 57-72. Doi: 10.15446/rfmvz.v62n2.51995.
En la página 69, Tabla 5, los valores de FDN y FDA están trocados en las introducciones identificadas con códigos 1.4; 1.6; 1.8; 13.5 y 22.14 y el valor de FDN de la introducción 17.9 son valores incorrectos. A continuación se presenta la Tabla 5 con los valores corregidos:
TABLA 5 Características físicas, productivas y de calidad de ocho introducciones de T. diversifolia evaluadas en el Valle del Cauca.
| Introducción | TAC (gr/d) | Altura (cm) | AD (m) | AF (cm) | BMS/ planta (kg) | MS (%) | FDN (%) | FDA (%) | PC (%) | VRF (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | Media | 90.3 | 217.7 | 3.7 | 68.4 | 2 | 24.9 | 52.8 | 48.53 | 12.9 | 90.1 |
| DE | 20 | 32.3 | 1 | 14.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.49 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 2.51 | |
| 1.3 | Media | 78.9 | 177 | 3.3 | 66.2 | 1.4 | 23.2 | 46.65 | 45.95 | 11.4 | 106 |
| DE | 39.4 | 35.3 | 1 | 20.2 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 5.59 | 0.56 | |
| 1.4 | Media | 58.5 | 180.8 | 3 | 66.4 | 1 | 24.8 | 60.68 | 53.04 | 23 | 73 |
| DE | 50.2 | 47.8 | 1.8 | 8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.52 | 1.48 | 9.17 | 0.92 | |
| 1.6 | Media | 66.4 | 195.3 | 2.4 | 61 | 0.6 | 22.2 | 56.65 | 43.92 | 10.3 | 94.8 |
| DE | 59.6 | 55.4 | 2.3 | 10.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.77 | 0.32 | 1.16 | |
| 1.8 | Media | 68.3 | 193 | 1.4 | 75.2 | 1.4 | 23.3 | 47.67 | 45.85 | 12.5 | 104 |
| DE | 21.3 | 19.3 | 1.3 | 13.4 | 0.4 | 1 | 1.68 | 1.73 | 0.31 | 6.29 | |
| 13.5 | Media | 102.4 | 187.4 | 4.4 | 59.5 | 1.5 | 24.7 | 58.01 | 44.10 | 10.7 | 92.2 |
| DE | 23.1 | 25.3 | 1.2 | 20.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 3.05 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 4.28 | |
| 22.14 | Media | 166.5 | 232.4 | 5.1 | 69.4 | 2.1 | 21 | 56.20 | 50.45 | 11 | 83.2 |
| DE | 17.1 | 47.7 | 0.5 | 20.8 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0.92 | 1.22 | |
| 17.9 | Media | 138.4 | 261.2 | 4.4 | 72.5 | 2 | 24.9 | 55,03 | 54,48 | 16.2 | 78.7 |
| DE | 37.2 | 24.9 | 1.5 | 15.6 | 2 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 8.31 | 0.53 | 12.5 |
TAC: Tasa de crecimiento, HD: Altura de dosel, (AD): Área de dosel, AF: Área foliar, BMS/planta: Biomasa de materia seca/por planta, MS: Materia seca, FDN: Fibra detergente neutro, FDA: Fibra detergente ácido, PC: proteína cruda, VRF: Valor relativo forrajero.
