SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.69 issue1Production dynamics and greenhouse gas modeled emissions from regional dairy production systems in HondurasProspects for sustainable production in integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA): a review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia

Print version ISSN 0120-2952

Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot. vol.69 no.1 Bogotá Jan./Apr. 2022  Epub June 09, 2022

https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v69n1.101537 

Artículos de investigación

Evaluation of chemical silage on egg quality parameters in ISA Brown line laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus)

Evaluación del ensilado químico sobre los parámetros de calidad del huevo en gallinas ponedoras de la línea ISA Brown (Gallus gallus domesticus)

Y. S. Gaviria1 

L. F. Londono2 

J. E. Zapata3 

1 Grupo de investigación en nutrición y tecnología de alimentos, NUTEC, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia (Colombia).

2 Politécnico Jaime Isaza Cadavid, Medellín, Antioquia (Colombia).

3 Grupo de investigación en nutrición y tecnología de alimentos, NUTEC, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia (Colombia). edgar.zapata@udea.edu.co


ABSTRACT

In this study we evaluated the inclusion of chemical silage from red tilapia viscera (Oreochromis sp.) in diets for ISA Brown line laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and its influence on nutritional parameters and egg quality. A total of 56 16-week-old laying hens were randomly divided into two groups (one per diet), which in turn were subdivided into 7 groups, each with 4 birds. Eggs were collected during the first 13 weeks of laying. During this period the egg quality parameters were evaluated until week 11; the bromatological characterization of the egg was carried out in the 2nd and 4th week of laying. The results indicated that the inclusion of chemical silage in 17,18% dry matter does not result in statistically significant differences in egg quality parameters or in their bromatological composition, with respect to the control. This led to the conclusion that chemical silage can be used as an alternative to protein inputs such as fish meal and soybean cake in the diet of laying hens, without modifying the quality of the final product.

Keywords: chemical silage; red tilapia; Haugh units; laying hen

RESUMEN

En este trabajo se evaluó la inclusion de ensilado químico de vísceras de tilapia roja (Oreochromis sp.) en dietas para gallinas ponedoras (Gallus gallus domesticus) de la raza Isa-Brown, y su influencia sobre parámetros nutricionales y la calidad del huevo. Se utilizó un total de 56 gallinas ponedoras de 16 semanas de edad divididas al azar en dos grupos (uno por dieta), los cuales a su vez se subdividieron en 7 grupos de 4 aves cada uno. Se les recolectó huevos durante las primeras 13 semanas de postura. Durante este periodo se realizó la evaluación de los parámetros de calidad del huevo hasta la semana 11. La caracterización bromatológica del huevo se realizo en las semanas 2 y 4, luego de haber sido puestos. Los resultados indicaron que la inclusion de ensilado químico en un 17,18% materia seca, no genera diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,05) en los parámetros de calidad del huevo ni en su composición bromatológica, con respecto al control. Esto permitió concluir que el ensilado químico puede ser usado como alternativa a insumos proteicos como harina de pescado y torta de soya en la alimentación de gallinas ponedoras, sin modificar la calidad del producto final.

Palabras clave: ensilado químico; tilapia roja; unidades Haugh; gallina ponedora

INTRODUCTION

World fish production has shown sustained growth in recent decades, reaching 171 million tons in 2016, of which 86% was for direct human consumption (FAO 2018). In Colombia the fish farming sector in 2017 showed a growth in production of 9% with a total of 120,230 tons, with the red tilapia species contributing the most (62%), followed by white cachama (16%), silver tilapia (14%), trout (5%), and other species (3%) (Ministerio de Agricultura 2017) . This growth is accompanied by an equivalent volume of waste, which can cause significant environmental impacts as it represents between 60-70% (w/w) of total production (Martínez-Álvarez et al. 2015; Suarez et al. 2018). Despite being important sources of protein, this waste is most often discarded without any attempt of recovery. However, this waste can be used for animal feed, to obtain fishmeal, fats, or fertilizers, among other uses (Chalamaiah et al. 2012).

One of the processes for the recovery of nutrients from fish by-products that is currently in use is silage (Suarez et al. 2018) . This process involves the addition of acids, enzymes or lactic acid bacteria to the raw fish or its parts, causing a decrease in pH and liquefaction of the mass by the effect of endogenous enzymes, which act under acidic conditions (Fernández Herrero et al. 2013). The product obtained is a paste-like semi-liquid, greyish brown in color, with a characteristic fishy smell. This product provides partially hydrolyzed proteins, with nutritional properties very similar to those of the fish from which it is derived (Botello 2010).

The poultry industry is one of the fastest growing and most flexible of all livestock sectors. Driven primarily by strong demand, it has expanded, consolidated, and globalized over the past 15 years in countries at all levels of development (FAO 2013). However, the high cost of poultry feed is one of the main problems in the production chain, since approximately 95% of it is used to meet protein and energy needs, with fishmeal and soybean cake being the main sources of protein and cornmeal the main source of energy (Ravindran 2013). Egg is one of the most complete and easily accessible foods of animal origin. However, establishing the specifications and quality control of eggs for human consumption is not an easy problem to solve, since it involves numerous factors, diet being one of the principals (Andrade-Yucailla et al. 2015). Therefore, the objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect on egg quality parameters of the inclusion of chemical silage from red tilapia viscera (Oreochromis sp.) in diets for laying hens of the Isa Brown breed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The red tilapia viscera (Oreochromis sp.) were supplied by the El Gaitero fish farm, located in the municipality of San Jerónimo, Antioquia (Colombia). Immediately after gutting, they were taken to the laboratory, where they were defatted by heating them to 67°C for 30 minutes, letting the temperature drop to 45°C, decanting the fat, and then freezing them (-18°C) for 24 hours. This achieves a better oil separation, as the phases solidify separately (Arias et al. 2017). Subsequently, the lipid phase was separated from the frozen watery phase (rich in protein). The latter was crushed by a blade mill to homogenize it, then mixed with 0,03% sulfuric acid at 97% (Merck, Germany) and 1,16% formic acid at 85% (Merck, Germany) to start the hydrolysis and acidification process. Subsequently, BHT (Butylated hydroxytoluene) (Tecnas S. A., Colombia) and potassium sorbate (Tecnas S. A., Colombia) were added as antioxidant and preservative, respectively. Finally, the mixture was stored at 25°C for a period of 8 days. During this time the product was homogenized through agitation and pH checks were made every two days until it stabilized.

Bird feeding

In this study, 56 16-week-old laying hens (Gallusgallus domesticus) of the breed Isa Brown were randomly divided into two equal groups called control (DC) and silage (DE), which were further subdivided into 7 groups with 4 birds each, which were fed from week 16 to week 32. The isoproteic diets were developed following the nutritional requirements established in the Brazilian tables for poultry feeding (table 1) (Rostagno et al. 2011). The DC group was fed with a diet in which protein source was conventional materials such as fish meal and soybean cake, while the DE group was fed with a diet that contained 42% of the protein from red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) silage. The birds were fed twice at day (morning and afternoon) with a 90 g/ day ration for each bird, and a constant supply of water.

TABLE 1 Composition and bromatological analysis of the diets 

1Mineral vitamin supplement (composition per 250 g of product): vit. A - 1.400.000 IU; vit. B1 - 500 mg; vit. B12 - 300 mg; vit. B2 = 500 mg; vit. B6 - 1,6 g; vit. D3 - 2.500.000 IU; vit. E - 6000 IU; vit. K3 = 1000 mg; biotin - 30 mg; niacin -12 g; folic acid - 1 g; cobalt - 50 mg; Copper - 3000 mg; Iron - 25 g; Iodine - 500 mg; Manganese - 32,5 g; Selenium - 100,50 mg; Zinc - 22,49 g

Source: self-made.

Ethics committee approval

This research was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Universidad de Antioquia (Act. 103 May 10-2016).

Physical-chemical and microbiological analysis

The physicochemical characterization of the silage and the eggs was done according to specifications established by the AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) (2000). The moisture content was determined by the methodology set out in standard 930,15 by drying the sample at 105°C for 8 hours. The protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method, standard 954,01. The ashes were analyzed according to standard 942,05. The fat was analyzed according to standard 920,39. The carbohydrate determination was carried out by subtracting the other components mentioned above from 100% of the sample (Spanopoulos-Hernandez et al. 2010). The physicochemical analyses of the eggs were carried out at the 2nd and 4th week of laying.

The microbiological analyses were determined according to the Colombian Technical Standard NTC 3688 (ICONTEC 1999), which establishes the analysis of aerobic mesophilic, total and fecal coliforms, Salmonella spp. Clostridium sulphite, reducing spores and molds and yeasts for this type of substrate.

Egg quality assessment

Different analyses of some components were carried out to determine the quality of the egg, which are described below.

The egg weight was determined by means of a 1 g precision analytical scale, model TxB220-1L (Shimadzu, Japan). Weights were measured daily for 13 weeks. The shape and symmetry of the egg was determined by measuring the longitudinal and transverse diameter, using a vernier caliper (Guerra Morales & Molina Díaz 2016). Haugh units are an international measurement for determining egg quality and freshness by relating egg weight in grams (p) and albumen height in millimeters (h). Based on these measurements, the units are calculated from the following equation (Suárez-Cardoso et al. 2016):

UH = 100 log (h - 1,7p 0,37 + 7,6)

Shell thickness was determined using a 0,0001 mm precision digital micrometer (Surtek, China). Shell hardness was determined using an EZ-SX texturizer (Shimadzu, Kyoto), using a 500 Newton (N) load cell and a speed of 100 mm/min until complete breaking of the eggshell was achieved.

Statistical analysis

The data collected were evaluated by hypothesis testing to determine mean differences of egg quality variables using Fisher's LSD (least significant difference) test, and the Statgraphics Centurion XVI software, with a 95% confidence level.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Bromatological composition of the silage

Table 2 presents the proximal composition of the viscera and its silage. The protein and lipid composition of the viscera is typical for this species (Arias et al. 2017; Suarez et al. 2018). On the other hand, the values in the silage tend to be higher than those found for acid silage from freshwater fish waste with 44,38% protein on dry basis (Vidotti et al. 2003) and that of organic tuna silage (Thunnus albacares) with 30,52% crude protein (Spanopoulos-Hernandez et al. 2010).

TABLE 2 Bromatological composition of the viscera and viscera silage from red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) 

Source: self-made.

Regarding the silage, the typical characteristics were obtained with a semi-liquid paste-like consistency, a greyish brown color, and a characteristic fishy smell (Botello 2010; Suarez et al. 2018). Its nutritional composition makes it an ideal input for animal feed (Botello 2010). Proteins and lipids from tilapia silage residues have been used for feeding mainly herbivorous and omnivorous species, with satisfactory results, being used as a partial substitute for fishmeal (Goosen et al. 2014; Güllü et al. 2014), which is the most widely used source of animal protein in animal feed, precisely because of its digestibility and protein content (Chalamaiah et al. 2012). Thus, this research is part of the current trend of evaluating the effects of using mixtures from fish sources to reduce the environmental impact generated by fish farming (Smárason et al. 2017; Suárez et al. 2018).

For the DE diet, 43,4% of the wet chemical silage was included. This was a considerable fraction of the formulation, which corresponds to 17,8% on dry basis; this percentage represents a substitution of 57,37 and 23% of soybean cake and fishmeal, respectively. Different studies have used values around 15% of silage with similar physicalchemical parameters of protein and fat, in tilapia feed (Llanes et al. 2010), which is important to highlight because in this case the use of silage would be maximized.

On the other hand, the microbiological evaluation of the chemical silage is shown in table 3. These values are within those established by the Colombian Agricultural Institute's guidelines for raw materials and inputs for animal feed (ICA 1999), which indicate that chemical silage from tilapia viscera can be used as an input in the preparation of feed for ISA Brown line laying hens without causing any condition or pathology.

TABLE 3 Microbiological characterization of the red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) viscera silage 

Source: self-made.

Figure 1 presents the behavior of egg weight as a function of time for the two diets evaluated. It is observed that in the first 11 weeks of laying the egg weight had no statistically significant difference between the DC and DE diets (P > 0,05). In both the weight presents a constant increase as a function of time. Same result has already been reported by Padhi et al. (2013), who concluded that the egg increases in weight until week 52. Between week 12 and 13 the silage diet achieved a significant increase (P < 0,05) in egg weight over the control diet. Similar weights were obtained by Batalha et al. (2018), who used a lower silage substitution, which may indicate that using higher concentrations of silage does not significantly affect the weight of eggs over time, on the contrary, this substitution could favor it, mainly because of the quality of lipid levels in the diet, since yolk formation and laying depend significantly on energy and lipid levels in the ovary (Chen 2003; Coorey et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2008).

FIGURE 1 Egg weight as a function of time during feeding of ISA Brown line laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) Source: self-made. 

TABLE 4 Egg size and shell thickness according to diet 

*SD: Standard deviation.

Source: self-made.

Table 4 shows the longitudinal and transverse diameters of the eggs for both diets as a function of time. Longitudinal and transverse diameter are directly associated with egg weight, i. e. heavier eggs tend to have larger diameters and vice versa (Andrade-Yucailla et al. 2015). This trend was observed in the last weeks of experimentation, in which eggs from the group of hens fed the silage diet, which have heavier eggs, and larger transverse and longitudinal diameter measurements compared to eggs from hens fed with the control diet (53 x 10-3 m vs. 50 x 10-3 m). These results coincide with those reported by Garcia Moreno et al. (2016). These authors reported that the productivity of the commercial layer is influenced by body weight, which affects not only the number and weight of eggs, but also their size distribution (Garcia Moreno et al. 2016). Similar results were reported by Juárez-Caratachea et al. (2010), who determined the egg quality in Michoacan-México, obtaining transverse and longitudinal diameters from 53 x 10-3 m to 58 x 10-3 m, and 40 x 10-3 m to 43 x 10-3 m, respectively (Juárez et al. 2010).

Another variable in the egg quality is the shell thickness (table 4). This variable is used as an indicator of quality in the egg (Stadelman et al. 1995) because it supports and preserves the other structural parts of it. Likewise, it is the first physical protection barrier against mechanical damage (Nys & Guyot 2011). This variable did not present significant statistically differences (P < 0,05) between the two study groups, indicating that the substitution of protein raw materials by silage from red tilapia viscera did not cause any effect on the thickness of the shell, coinciding with what was reported by Silva et al. (2017), who did not find significant differences in this variable. In their study, they replace soybean cake with fish waste meal in a proportion of 1 to 4%. However, these results were lower than those of the present study (382 x 10-6 m vs. 564 x 10-6 Lim).

Haugh units (table 4) are an important indicator of egg quality. They are used as an index of freshness in the egg. A higher value of this parameter indicates a higher freshness index (Instituto de Estudios del Huevo 2009). Table 4 shows the values obtained from Haugh units in this study, according to diet and laying weeks. There were statistically significant differences regarding diet (p < 0,05), with silage diet values being higher than those found for the control diet. This indicate that the inclusion of chemical silage from red tilapia viscera presented a beneficial effect on this quality variable, indicating a higher level of freshness. Similar data was reported by Batalha et al. (2018), using different levels of Pirarucu silage substitution (0,3 to 3%), without presenting statistically significant differences with the increase in silage substitution (Batalha et al. 2018), which can be corroborated in this study where a 17,8% substitution was used.

Figure 2 shows the behavior of shell hardness as a function of time, for the two diets studied. There were no statistically significant differences (p < 0,05) between the two diets, nor in each of them over time. These values are within the theoretical ranges established in several studies, such as the one carried out by Guard-Bouldin et al. (2006) and Clerici et al. (2006), who reported shell hardness values between 30 N to 41 N for both studies (Clerici et al. 2006; Guard-Bouldin & Buhr 2006).

FIGURE 2 Egg hardness as a function of time during feeding of ISA Brown line laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) Source: self-made. 

TABLE 5 Composition and bromatological analysis of the egg according to diet 

Source: self-made.

Means within a row for experimental samples without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).

Regarding the physicochemical composition of the egg white and yolk (table 5), where different letters in the same column indicate the presence of statistically significant differences (p < 0,05) between the two diets evaluated, it was observed that only the protein variable of the egg white presented statistically significant differences (p < 0,05). This is similar to the results reported by Seibel & Souza-Soares (2004), whose study was carried out using fish silage in percentages that varied between 5 and 10% in quail feeding. However, these authors obtained higher protein values compared to those found in this study (94% vs. 88%). On the other hand, in the control and silage groups (table 5), an increase of 57 to 64% in the concentration of fat in the egg yolk was observed in favor of the silage group, which indicates that this may favor the synthesis of lipids for egg yolk formation (Seibel & Souza-Soares 2004). However, other authors such as Anderson (2013) and Toyes Vargas (2016) found values lower than those found in this study for fat in white and brown chicken egg yolks, with results between 35 and 40%, respectively. These differences may be due to the type of viscera and processes used to obtain the silage, which was made from squid and hatchet fish. However, it is important to mention that laying birds require twice as many lipids in the liver to promote yolk formation and thus the increase in egg laying (Chen 2003; Coorey et al. 2015).

On the other hand, according to table 5, the crude protein level in the yolk was 30,37 and 29,98% for the control and silage group, respectively. These two diets did not present significant differences (p < 0,05) in the weeks of the analysis. However, these results contrast with those of Grobas & Mateos (1996), who obtained higher protein values between 49 and 46% in laying birds. Regarding the ash, around 4% for both groups (table 6), this result is consistent with other authors such as Benjumea (2010) y Ramirez et al. (2013), who obtained similar values in feeding Hy-Line-Brown and quail line laying hens, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemical silage from red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) viscera has the necessary bromatological and microbiological characteristics to be used as a protein input in the design of diets for laying hens. The use of this silage in the feeding of ISA Brown line laying hens does not affect the quality parameters of the egg, which indicates that it can be used as an alternative input to conventional protein raw materials such as fishmeal and soybean cake.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND FUNDING

The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by the Comité para el Desarrollo de la Investigación en la Universidad de Antioquia (CODI) through sustainability program and COLCIEN-CIAS (Project Code 111574558746).

REFERENCES

Anderson KE. 2013. Comparison of fatty acid, cholesterol, vitamin A and E composition, and trans fats in eggs from brown and white egg strains that were molted or nonmolted. Poult Sci. 92(12):3259-3265. doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03377. [ Links ]

Andrade-Yucailla V, Vargas-Burgos JC, Lima-Orozco R, Moyano J, Navarrete H, López J, Sánchez J. 2015. Caracteristicas fisicas del huevo de gallina criolla y campera (Gallus gallus domesticus) en la región amazónica del Ecuador. Actas Iberoam Conserv Anim. 6(October):49-59. [ Links ]

AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th edition. Washington, USA: Association of Official Analysis Chemists International. [ Links ]

Arias L, Gómez LJ, Zapata JE. 2017. Efecto de temperatura-tiempo sobre los lipidos extraidos de Vísceras de tilapia roja (Oreochromis sp.) utilizando un proceso de calentamiento-congelación. InfTecnol. 28(5):131-142. doi:10.4067/s0718-07642017000500014. [ Links ]

Batalha O de S, Alfaia SS, Cruz FGG, Jesus RS, Rufino JPF, Silva AF. 2018. Pirarucu by-product acid silage meal in diets for commercial laying hens. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 20(2):371-376. doi:10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0518. [ Links ]

Benjumea C. 2010. Evaluacion del bienestar animal y comparacion de los parametros productivos en gallinas ponedoras de la linea hy- line brown en tres modelos de produccion piso, jaula y pastoreo. Rev Cienc Anim. 3:9-22. [ Links ]

Botello AJ. 2010. Conservación in Vitro de Tres Ensilajes de Pescado (Opisthonema Oglinum) Caracterización Fisico-Química. Rev Electrónica Granma Cienc. 14(1027-975X):1-15. [ Links ]

Chalamaiah M., Hemalatha R., Jyothirmayi T. 2012. Fish protein hydrolysates: proximate composition, amino acid composition, anti-oxidant activities and applications: a review. Food Chem. 135:3020-3038. [ Links ]

Chen C. 2003. Effect of adding Chicory fructans in feed on broiler growth performance, serum cholesterol and intestinal lenght. Int J Poult Sci. 3:214-219. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2003.214.219. [ Links ]

Clerici F, Casiraghi E, Hidalgo A, Rossi M. 2006. Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. (August):98-103. [ Links ]

Coorey R, Novinda A, Williams H, Jayasena V. 2015. Omega-3 Fatty Acid Profile of Eggs from Laying Hens Fed Diets Supplemented with Chia, Fish Oil, and Flaxseed. J Food Sci. 80(1):S180-S187. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.12735. [ Links ]

FAO. 2013. Revisión del Desarrollo Avicola [internet] [citado en 2022, 06 de marzo]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3531s/i3531s.pdf . [ Links ]

FAO. 2018. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5600s/y5600s00.pdf. [ Links ]

Fernández Herrero A, Tabera A, Agüeria D, Manca E. 2013. Obtención, caracterización microbio-lógica y fisicoquimica de ensilado biológico de anchoita (Engraulis anchoita). Rev Electrónica Vet. 14(1695-7504). [ Links ]

Garcia Moreno D, Colas M, López W, Pérez E, Sánchez A, Lamazares M, Grandia R. 2016. El peso corporal y su efecto sobre indicadores bioproductivos en gallinas White Leghorn L33. Rev la Fac Med Vet y Zootec. 63(3):188-200. doi:10.15446/rfmvz.v63n3.62714. [ Links ]

Goosen NJ, de Wet LF, Görgens JF, Jacobs K, de Bruyn A. 2014. Fish silage oil from rainbow trout processing waste as alternative to conventional fish oil in formulated diets for Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 188:74-84. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.019. [ Links ]

GroBas S, Mateos G. 1996. Influencia de la nutrición sobre la composición nutricional del huevo. XII Curso de Especialización FEDNA, España. [ Links ]

Guard-Bouldin J, Buhr RJ. 2006. Evaluation of eggshell quality of hens infected with Salmonella enteritidis by application of compression. Poult Sci. 85(1):129-135. doi:10.1093/ps/85.1.129. [ Links ]

Guerra Morales JL, Molina Diaz RG. 2016. Evaluación de la calidad del huevo procedente de tres distribuidoras como propuesta para estandarización de parámetros de calidad del mercado Hondureno. Zamorano, Honduras: Escuela Agricola Panamericana. [ Links ]

Güllü K, Acar Ü, Tezel R, Yozukmaz A. 2014. Replacement of fish meal with fish processing by-product silage in diets for the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Pak J Zool. 46(6):1697-1703. [ Links ]

Icontec. 1999. NTC 3688 Alimentos para animales. 1. [ Links ]

Instituto Colombiano de Agricultura (ICA). 1999. Directivas técnicas de alimentos para animales y sales mineralizadas. Colombia. [ Links ]

Instituto de estudios del huevo. 2009. El gran libro del huevo. Madrid: Editorial Everest S. A. [ Links ]

Juárez A, Gutiérrez E, Segura J, Santos R. 2010. Calidad del Huevo de Gallinas Criollas Criadas En Traspatio En Michoacán, México. Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems. 12(1):109-115. [ Links ]

Llanes JE, Bórquez A, Toledo J, De ML. 2010. Digestibilidad aparente de los ensilajes de residuos pesqueros en tilapias rojas (Oreochromis mossambicus x O. niloticus). Zootec Trop. 28:499-505. [ Links ]

Martinez-Alvarez O, Chamorro S, Brenes A. 2015. Protein hydrolysates from animal processing by-products as a source of bioactive molecules with interest in animal feeding: A review. Food Res Int. 73(1069):204-212. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.005. [ Links ]

Ministerio de Agricultura. 2017. Cadena de la Acuicultura 2017 [internet]. Bogotá. [citado 2022, 06 de marzo] Disponible en: Disponible en: https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Acuicultura/Documentos/002%2520-%2520Cifras%2520Sectoriales/002%2520-%2520Cifras%2520Sectoriales%2520-%25202017%2520%2520Junio%2520Acuicultura.pptx+&cd=1&hl=es-419&ct=clnk&gl=co . [ Links ]

Nys Y, Guyot N. 2011. Egg formation and chemistry. Woodhead Publishing Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84569-754-9.50006-1. [ Links ]

Ramirez JCR, Ibarra JI, Romero FA, Ulloa PR, Ulloa JA, Matsumoto KS, Cordoba BV, Manzano M ángel M. 2013. Preparation of biological fish silage and its effect on the performance and meat quality characteristics of quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Brazilian Arch Biol Technol. 56(6):1002-1010. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132013000600016. [ Links ]

Ravindran V. 2013. Disponibilidad de piensos y nutrición de aves de corral en paises en desarrollo-Avances en la nutrición de las aves de corral. FAO:1-4. [ Links ]

Rostagno HS, Texeira LF, Lopez J, Cezar P, Flávila de Oliveira R, Clementino D, Soares A, Lluiz de Toledo S, Frederico R. 2011. Tablas Brasilenas para Aves y Cerdos. 157-166. [ Links ]

Seibel NF, Souza-Soares LA. 2004. Efeito do residuo de pescado sobre as caracteristicas fisicas e quimicas de ovos de codornas armazenados em diferentes períodos. Semin Ciências Agrárias. 25(1):35-44. [ Links ]

Silva AF, Cruz FGG, Rufino JPF, Miller WMP, Flor NS, Assante RT. 2017. Fish by-product meal in diets for commercial laying hens. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 39(3):273-279. doi:10.4025/actascianimsci.v39i3.34102. [ Links ]

Smárason BÖ, Ögmundarson Ó, Árnason J, Bjôrnsdóttir R. 2017. Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Types. Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci. 17(1303-2712):79-90. doi:10.4194/1303-2712-v17. [ Links ]

Spanopoulos-Hernández M, Ponce-Palafox JT, Barba-Quintero G, Ruelas-Inzunza JR, Tiznado-Contreras MR, Hernández-González C, Shirai K. 2010. Production ofbiological silage from fish waste, the smoked yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and fillet of tilapia (Oreochromis sp), for feeding aquaculture species. Rev Mex Ing Qum. 9(2):167-178. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960206448&partn erID=40&md5=aebc679ffc5dee73f2cd9d052af5db5c. [ Links ]

Stadelman WJ, Newkirk D, Newby L. 1995. Egg Science and Technology. 4th ed. Boca Raton: Group T and F. [ Links ]

Suárez-Cardoso D, Rios-Cruz K, Penuela-Sierra L, Castaneda-Serrano R. 2016. Utilización de humus de lombriz roja californiana (Eisenia foetida Saligny, 1826) en la alimentación de gallinas ponedoras. Boletin cientifico Cent Museos Mus Hist Nat. 20(1):43-51. doi:10.17151/bccm.2016.20.1.4. http://boletincientifico.ucaldas.edu.co/downloads/Boletin(20)1_4.pdf. [ Links ]

Suárez LM, Montes JR, Zapata JE. 2018. Optimización del Contenido de Ácidos en Ensilados de Visceras de Tilapia Roja (Oreochromis spp.) con Análisis del Ciclo de Vida de los Alimentos Derivados. Inf tecnológica. 29(6):83-94. doi:10.4067/s0718-07642018000600083. [ Links ]

Toyes Vargas EA. 2016. Aprovechamiento de subproductos marinos para la alimentación de camarón de cultivo y gallinas ponedoras. La Paz, Baja California Sur: Centro de investigaciones biológicas del noroeste. [ Links ]

Vidotti RM, Viegas EMM, Carneiro DJ. 2003. Amino acid composition of processed fish silage using different raw materials. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 105(1-4):199-204. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00056-7. [ Links ]

Zhou E, Pan X, Tian X. 2008. Application Study of Xylo-oligosaccharide in Layer Production. Mod Appl Sci. 3(1):103-107. doi:10.5539/mas.v3n1p103. [ Links ]

Forma de citación del artículo: Gaviria YS, Londono LF, Zapata JE. 2022. Evaluation of chemical silage on egg quality parameters in ISA Brown line laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Rev Med Vet Zoot. 69(1): 63-74. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v69n1.101537

Received: October 15, 2020; Accepted: August 18, 2021

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the work presented here.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License