SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue4Simulation in health care author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Colombian Journal of Anestesiology

Print version ISSN 0120-3347

Rev. colomb. anestesiol. vol.44 no.4 Bogotá Oct./Dec. 2016

 

Editorial

Perioperative Ultrasound: The challenge of applying an old technology in new clinical settings*

Ultrasonido Perioperatorio: El reto de aplicar una vieja tecnología en nuevos escenarios clínicos

María Fernanda Rojas-Gómeza,*, Antonio José Bonilla-Rb

a Anaesthetist, Sociedad Especializada de Anestesiología SEA S.A. Clínica Carlos Ardila Lülle, Fellow in Ultrasound-guided Regional Anaesthesia WFSA - CLAS-SBA, Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia
b Assistant Professor, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Medical School, Anaesthetist, Pain Clinic Coordinator, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Fellow in Regional Anaesthesia and Pain, A1PPS University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Founding Member of the Ultrasound Applications Committee, Sociedad Cundinamarquesa de Anestesiología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia

* Please cite this article as: Rojas-Gómez MF, Bonilla-R AJ. Ultrasonido Perioperatorio: El reto de aplicar una vieja tecnología en nuevos escenarios clínicos. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2016;44:267-269.
** Corresponding author at: Anaesthetist, Sociedad Especializada de Anestesiología SEA S.A. Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia.
E-mail address mariafernanda.mfrojas@gmail.com (M.F. Rojas-Gómez).


In anaesthesia, anticipating problems and responding quickly and effectively to peri-operative risks to the patient is crucial. As a result of recent technological advances over the last few decades, ultrasound has emerged as a tool to guide a huge number of procedures in the practice of various specialties. In particular in anaesthesia, it has become critical in establishing vascular accesses, providing regional anaesthesia,1-9 performing interventional procedures for acute and chronic pain relief,10 and for gathering relevant qualitative information for the diagnosis or treatment of low output syndromes,11-15 hypovolemia, acute pulmonary events,16 and for the assessment of gastric content as a risk for aspiration,17 and assessment of the airway, among other things.18-20

The world literature supports the current use of ultrasound as an extension of the physical examination and as a teaching tool in undergraduate21 and graduate education.22 It is one more among the technologies that are part of the "Point of Care" concept, brought to the patient's bed to help with decision-making.23-26 The application of any new technology or diagnostic tool as part of medical practice must be framed within ethics and good clinical practices, something to which we cannot be indifferent.

Along the same lines, the application of an old technology in a new clinical setting by practitioners other than those traditionally linked to it, may be associated with vulnerabilities. This is precisely the fair source of concern of our Radiology colleagues, a situation which we fully understand from the point of view of education and development of skills.27,28

The widespread use of ultrasound during the peri-operative period constitutes a challenge for future anaesthesia training in formal and non-formal settings.29-35 Consequently, the introduction of ultrasound into anaesthesia training programmes, focusing on specific objectives by areas, becomes relevant. Like in non-formal education or in continuing medical education, the analysis of Miller's pyramid is warranted: knowing, knowing how, showing how, and finally mastering the skill. However, arriving at the top of the pyramid is not easy.

Consequently, which should be the scope of continuing medical education courses and training outside the academic setting?32,36-40 Do they confer the knowledge, and the know-how? Do they result in the achievement of competencies? Are just one, two, or three workshops enough? What kind of exposure is needed? What is the time required to develop the skill for using ultrasound correctly in a given clinical context? Does competency in one skill make the practitioner competent in the others? These and other questions emerge and must be answered responsibly.

It is up to scientific societies to answer these questions and create or provide guidelines for determining the right settings for skill development, working along a sound and structured path of continuing education. This is a great challenge to which we must and should rise as professionals and educators, driven by the benefits and the academic and scientific advancement in the world, in order to make sure that new generations of colleagues and those already in medical practice may profit from this resource that has revolutionised clinical practice in the majority of medical settings, for the benefit of our patients for whom we ultimately exist.

Funding

The authors did not receive sponsorship to carry out this article.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

1. Neal JM, Brull R, Chan VWS, Grant S, Horn J-L, Liu SS, et al. The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35 2 Suppl:S1-9.         [ Links ]

2. Mathur V, Bravos ED, Vallera C, Wu CL. Regional anesthesia and patient outcomes: evidence-based medicine. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2008;12:163-70.         [ Links ]

3. Sites BD, Brull R. Ultrasound guidance in peripheral regional anesthesia: philosophy, evidence-based medicine, and techniques. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:630-9.         [ Links ]

4. Antonakakis JG, Ting PH, Sites B. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for peripheral nerve blocks: an evidence-based outcome review. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29:179-91.         [ Links ]

5. Neal JM. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and patient safety: update of an evidence-based analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;41:195-204.         [ Links ]

6. Guidelines for fellowship training in Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine: second edition, 2010. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:282-8.         [ Links ]

7. Fischer B. Benefits, risks, and best practice in regional anesthesia: do we have the evidence we need? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:545-8.         [ Links ]

8. Narouze SN, Provenzano D, Peng P, Eichenberger U, Lee SC, Nicholls B, et al. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, and the Asian Australasian Federation of Pain Societies Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:657-64.         [ Links ]

9. Dhir S, Ganapathy S, Dhir A. Role of ultrasound guidance in regional anesthesia. Kuwait Med J. 2007;39:4-9.         [ Links ]

10. Bhatia A, Brull R. Is ultrasound guidance advantageous for interventional pain management? A systematic review of chronic pain outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:236-51.         [ Links ]

11. Sharma V, Fletcher SN. A review of echocardiography in anaesthetic and peri-operative practice. Part 2: Training and accreditation. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:919-27.         [ Links ]

12. Spencer KT, Kimura BJ, Korcarz CE, Pellikka PA, Rahko PS, Siegel RJ. Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:567-81.         [ Links ]

13. Conlin F, Roy Connelly N, Raghunathan K, Friderici J, Schwabauer A. Focused transthoracic cardiac ultrasound: a survey of training practices. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:102-6.         [ Links ]

14. Shillcutt SK, Bick JS. A comparison of basic transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography views in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:1231-6.         [ Links ]

15. Shakil O, Mahmood F, Matyal R. Simulation in echocardiography: an ever-expanding frontier. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:476-85.         [ Links ]

16. Colmenero M, García-Delgado M, Navarrete I, López-Milena G. Utilidad de la ecografía pulmonar en la unidad de medicina intensiva. Med Intensiva. 2010;34:620-8.         [ Links ]

17. Arzola C, Perlas A, Siddiqui NT, Carvalho JCA. Bedside gastric ultrasonography in term pregnant women before elective cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study Anesth Analg. 2015;121:752-8.         [ Links ]

18. Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:456-62.         [ Links ]

19. Dinsmore J, Heard AMB, Green RJ. The use of ultrasound to guide time-critical cannula tracheotomy when anterior neck airway anatomy is unidentifiable. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:506-10.         [ Links ]

20. Adler AC, Greeley WJ, Conlin F, Feldman JM. Perioperative anesthesiology ultrasonographic evaluation (PAUSE): a guided approach to perioperative bedside ultrasound. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:521-9.         [ Links ]

21. Baltarowich OH, Di Salvo DN, Scoutt LM, Brown DL, Cox CW, DiPietro MA, et al. National ultrasound curriculum for medical students. Ultrasound Q. 2014;30:13-9.         [ Links ]

22. Bennett S. Training guidelines for ultrasound: worldwide trends. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23:363-73.         [ Links ]

23. Cholley BP. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1077-83.         [ Links ]

24. Deshpande R, Akhtar S, Haddadin A. Utility of ultrasound in the ICU. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27:123-32.         [ Links ]

25. Volpicelli G. Point-of-care lung ultrasound. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2014;103:711-6.         [ Links ]

26. Ramsingh D, Rinehart J, Kain Z, Strom S, Canales C, Alexander B, et al. Impact assessment of perioperative point-of-care ultrasound training on anesthesiology residents. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:670-82.         [ Links ]

27. Slater RJ, Castanelli DJ, Barrington MJ. Learning and teaching motor skills in regional anesthesia: a different perspective. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:230-9.         [ Links ]

28. Barrington MJ, Wong DM, Slater B, Ivanusic JJ, Ovens M. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:334-9.         [ Links ]

29. Skochelak SE. A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say? Acad Med. 2010;85:S26-33.         [ Links ]

30. Kopp SL, Smith HM. Developing effective web-based regional anesthesia education. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:336-42.         [ Links ]

31. Vovides Y,Chale SB, Gadhula R, Kebaetse MB, Nigussie NA, Suleman F, et al. A systems approach to implementation of eLearning in medical education: five MEPI Schools' journeys. Acad Med. 2014;89 8 Suppl:S102-6.         [ Links ]

32. Cheung JJH, Chen EW, Al-Allaq Y, Nikravan N, McCartney CJL, Dubrowski A, et al. Acquisition of technical skills in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using a high-fidelity simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:119-24.         [ Links ]

33. Luz J, Siddiqui I, Jain NB, Kohler MJ, Donovan J, Gerrard P,et al. Resident-perceived benefit of a diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound curriculum: a multifaceted approach using independent study, peer teaching, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil/Assoc Acad Physiatr. 2015;94:1095-103.         [ Links ]

34. Neri L, Storti E, Lichtenstein D. Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 2007;35 5 Suppl:S290-304.         [ Links ]

35. Hashimoto BE, Kasales C, Wall D, McDowell J, Lee M, Hamper UM. Teaching ultrasound professionalism. Ultrasound Q. 2014;30:91-5.         [ Links ]

36. Wegener JT, van Doorn CT, Eshuis JH, Hollmann MW, Preckel B, Stevens MF. Value of an electronic tutorial for image interpretation in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:44-9.         [ Links ]

37. Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD, Wiley CW, Bertrand ML, Blike GT. Characterizing novice behavior associated with learning ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:107-15.         [ Links ]

38. Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:1047-50.         [ Links ]

39. Sites BD, Gallagher JD, Cravero J, Lundberg J, Blike G. The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29: 544-8.         [ Links ]

40. Liu Y,Glass NL, Power RW. New teaching model for practicing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques: no perishable food products! Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1233-5.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License