SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 suppl.1Risk factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis relapses in Cali, ColombiaComparison of quick SOFA and SIRS scales at the bedside of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Biomédica

Print version ISSN 0120-4157On-line version ISSN 2590-7379

Biomédica vol.40  supl.1 Bogotá May 2020  Epub Aug 20, 2020

https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5149 

Original article

Salivary markers of oxidative stress and periodontal pathogens in patients with periodontitis from Santander, Colombia

Marcadores salivales de estrés oxidativo y agentes patógenos periodontales en pacientes con periodontitis en Santander, Colombia

Juana P. Sánchez-Villamil1  2  * 

Carolina Pino-Vélez3 

Juanita Trejos-Suárez4 

Néstor Cardona5 

Ana Lucía España1 

Pedro A. Alfonso1 

1 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bucaramanga, Colombia

2 Grupo de Investigación Biomédica Traslacional, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Santander, Colombia

3 Especialización en Periodoncia, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Colombia

4 Grupo de Investigación en Manejo Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia

5 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Armenia, Colombia


Abstract

Introduction:

Periodontitis affects more than 20% of the Latin American population. Oxidative markers are associated with greater progression of periodontitis; therefore, its role in pathogenesis should be studied.

Objective:

To determine the prevalence of the main oral bacteria and viruses associated with periodontitis and estimate the total antioxidant capacity and lipid peroxidation in saliva from patients with periodontitis.

Materials and methods:

We conducted systemically a cross-sectional study in 101 healthy subjects, 87 of whom had been diagnosed with periodontitis (P), according to the criteria of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Periodontology, and 14 without periodontal pockets as controls (C). In subgingival samples, major viruses and dental pathogenic bacteria were identified using PCR techniques. The levels of total antioxidant capacity and malon-di-aldehyde (MDA) were determined by spectrophotometry in samples of unstimulated saliva.

Results:

The mean of periodontal depth pocket and clinical attachment loss in patients with periodontitis was 5.6 ± 1.7 and 6.1 ± 3.1 mm, respectively. The most prevalent microorganisms were Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (32.5%) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (18.6%). The patients from rural areas showed a higher percentage of A. actinomycetemcomitans (urban: 17.9% vs. rural: 48.9%, p=0.0018). In patients with periodontitis, the frequency of EBV, HSV1 & 2, and HCMV genes was 2.3%. Periodontitis patients had higher levels of MDA (P: 2.1 ± 1.5; C: 0.46 ± 0.3 µmol/g protein; p=0.0001) and total antioxidant capacity (P: 0.32 ± 0.2; C: 0.15 ± 0.1 mM; p< 0.0036). Oxidative markers showed no modifications due to the presence of periodontopathic bacteria.

Conclusions:

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was the most prevalent bacteria; its presence did not modify the levels of oxidative markers in the saliva of patients with periodontitis.

Keywords: Periodontitis; oxidative stress; saliva; virus; Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Porphyromonas gingivalis

Resumen

Introducción.

La periodontitis afecta a más del 20 % de la población latinoamericana. La presencia de marcadores de estrés oxidativo se asocia con una mayor progresión de periodontitis, por lo que su rol en la patogenia debe estudiarse.

Objetivo.

Determinar la prevalencia de las principales bacterias y virus asociados con la periodontitis y estimar la capacidad antioxidante total y la peroxidación de lípidos en la saliva de los pacientes con periodontitis.

Materiales y métodos.

Se hizo un estudio transversal en 87 sujetos sanos diagnosticados con periodontitis (P) según los criterios de los Centers of Disease Control and Prevention y la American Academy of Periodontology y 14 sujetos sin enfermedad periodontal como grupo control (C). En las muestras subgingivales se identificaron los principales virus y bacterias mediante técnicas de PCR. Los niveles de capacidad antioxidante total y malon-di-aldehído (MDA) se establecieron mediante espectrofotometría en muestras de saliva no estimulada.

Resultados.

Las medias de profundidad del sondaje y del nivel de inserción clínico periodontal en pacientes con periodontitis fueron 5,6 ± 1,7 y 6,1 ± 3,1 mm, respectivamente. Los microorganismos más prevalentes fueron Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (32,5 %) y Porphyromonas gingivalis (18,6 %). Los pacientes de áreas rurales registraron un mayor porcentaje de A. actinomycetemcomitans (urbano: 17,9 % Vs. rural: 48,9 %; p=0,0018). La frecuencia de los genes EBV, HSV1 y 2, y HCMV fue de 2,3 %. En pacientes con periodontitis se evidenciaron mayores niveles de MDA (P: 2,1 ± 1,5; C: 0,46 ± 0,3 µmol/g proteína; p=0,0001) y capacidad antioxidante total (P: 0,32 ± 0,2; C: 0,15 ± 0,1 mM; p<0,0036). La presencia de bacterias periodontales patógenas no modificó los marcadores oxidativos.

Conclusiones.

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans fue el agente patógeno mas prevalente. Su presencia no modificó los niveles de marcadores oxidativos en la saliva de los pacientes con periodontitis.

Palabras clave: periodontitis; estrés oxidativo; saliva; virus; Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Porphyromonas gingivalis

The periodontal disease is, in fact, a group of infectious and inflammatory progressive conditions that cause the destruction of teeth-supporting tissues such as the periodontal ligament, connective tissue, and alveolar bone 1. Periodontitis is the most serious form of periodontal disease affecting 10.8% of the global population 2. The highest prevalence (20.4%) and incidence (1,427 cases/100,000 per year) of severe periodontitis are found in Latin America 3. The last national survey in oral health in Colombia (ENSAB IV) showed that, in terms of magnitude and impact on general health, periodontitis constitutes the second condition of interest in oral health among the Colombian adult population with a prevalence of 61.8% 4.

Periodontitis has a multifactor etiology where infectious and host-related factors such as habits and behaviors, genetics, systemic health, and inflammatory-immune response are involved 5. The persistence of microbial pathogens, prolonged inflammatory reaction, and systemic conditions generate oxidative stress 6,7, which is characterized by the increased production of reactive oxygen species 8 and the impairment of antioxidant defenses. Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of oxidative stress in the development and progression of periodontitis 9,10. The presence of viruses or virus-bacteria interaction in periodontitis is another possible factor of greater destruction of periodontal tissue 11.

In this context, the objective of our study was to determine the biomarkers of oxidative stress in the saliva of periodontitis patients and to estimate the prevalence of the main bacterial and viral dental pathogens. Understanding the local effects on markers of oxidative stress in periodontal disease could be useful for the prevention, diagnosis, and future development of therapeutic adjuvants for this pathology.

Materials and methods

Study population

A total of 101 patients between 18 and 65 years of age were recruited consecutively; 87 patients were diagnosed with periodontitis, and 14 with varying degrees of gingival inflammation but no periodontal pockets were selected as controls. Clinical assessments were performed between November, 2017, and November, 2018, in the dental clinic at Universidad Antonio Nariño (Bucaramanga) and during an external health campaign in the town of Puerto Wilches in Santander. The patients were invited to participate in the study and recruited if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria and manifested their will to participate by signing an informed consent previously approved by the institutional ethics committee at Universidad Antonio Nariño.

The inclusion criteria were: systemically healthy patients over 18 and under 65 years of age, with bleeding upon probing, and periodontal disease. The exclusion criteria were: patients having systemic disorders such as asthma, diabetes mellitus types 1 and 2, HIV, hypo- or hyperthyroidism who had received periodontal therapy in the previous year, had had flu or viral active infection two weeks before or at the moment of collecting the samples or had taken any anti-inflammatory or antibiotic medication in the six months previous to sample collection, and had used antibiotic therapy for routine dental procedures six months prior to the study.

Periodontitis case definition

We adopted the parameters to define periodontitis of the American Academy of Periodontology and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 12:

  • Gingivitis: without evidence of slight, moderate or advanced periodontitis.

  • Slight periodontitis: ≥2 interproximal sites with clinical attachment levels ≥3 mm and ≥2 interproximal sites with probing depth (PD), ≥4 mm (not in the same tooth) or one site with PD≥5 mm.

  • Moderate periodontitis: ≥ 2 interproximal sites with clinical attachment levels ≥4 mm (not in the same tooth) or ≥2 interproximal sites with PD≥5 mm (not in the same tooth).

  • Advanced periodontitis: ≥2 interproximal sites with clinical attachment levels ≥6 mm (not in the same tooth) and ≥1 interproximal site with PD≥5 mm.

Patients were submitted to a full periodontal examination excluding third molars. Millimetric periodontal probes (PCPUNC156 Hu-Friedy) were used in six different sites considering:

  1. PD in millimeters from the margin to the bottom of the groove in a range of PD≥4 mm.

  2. Bleeding upon probing in the percentage of sites with positive bleeding upon probing.

  3. Clinical attachment levels in millimeters as a result of the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the tip of a periodontal probe during usual periodontal probing.

Clinical examiners alignment

To validate the periodontal probing examinations performed by two periodontology specialists, we made a calibration to determine both intra- and inter-examiner reliability assessments. The intra-rater reliability was better than inter-rater reliability. Upper intra-rater agreement (exact and within 1 mm) was 0.79 ± 0.14 and lower intra-rater agreement was 0.47 ± 0.17 in 28 tests for all raters. Fleiss’ kappa among three raters was 0.40 with p<0.05.

Clinical measurements

All patients were examined by a single trained periodontist and probing depth measurements were performed by using a universal North Carolina - 15 periodontal probe (PCPUNC156; Hu - Friedy).

Saliva samples

Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected in the morning after a 12-h fasting period or in the afternoon at least 4 h after eating or drinking any food and at least 1 h after dental brushing. In all cases, saliva samples were collected before gingival crevicular fluid samples and after rinsing the mouth with water.

For saliva collection, the subjects were seated comfortably during a 10- min period with restricted conversation and were instructed to allow saliva to accumulate at the bottom of the mouth. Maintaining head tilted slightly forward, saliva samples were collected into a 4-ml polypropylene sterile saliva- collecting vial kept at 4 °C, then transferred to the laboratory and stored at -80 °C until the analyses were performed.

Selection of sampling sites

The subgingival samples were obtained at the same time of day but after saliva collection. Two or three teeth in different quadrants with the deepest periodontal pocket sites were selected. Before sampling, the individual tooth sites were isolated with cotton rolls and were gently air-dried. The supragingival plaque was carefully removed. Sterilized paper strips #30 and #35 were inserted into the gingival sulcus or periodontal pocket for 20-30 s. In cases of visible contamination with blood, the strips were discarded and a new sample was obtained. Strips from each subject were pooled and placed into labeled tubes containing 300 ml of phosphate buffer solution with a pH of 7.2.

After shaking for 15 min, the strips were removed and the eluates centrifuged for 5 min at 5,800g to remove plaque and cellular elements. The samples were then frozen at -80 °C until further biochemical analysis.

Determination of oxidative stress markers in saliva

Antioxidant assay analysis. Before their analysis, all saliva samples were centrifuged (800g) for 10 min to separate all cell debris. Total antioxidant capacity of saliva samples was determined by using a total antioxidant assay kit (Ref. CS0790, Sigma-Aldrich Co) based on the conversion of Cu2+ ion to Cu+ by both small molecules and protein antioxidants for its colorimetric detection at ~570 nm.

Determination of salivary malondialdehyde. As a measure of lipid peroxidation, levels of salivary MDA were determined by spectrophotometry using a lipid peroxidation assay kit (Ref. MAK085, Sigma-Aldrich).

Detection and identification of bacterial and viral pathogens. For DNA isolation, frozen samples from patients were left in 2-ml collection tubes with 0.5 ml sterile distilled water at room temperature for 20 min.

After adjusting the temperature of the samples to room temperature, the sample specimens were pre-clarified by centrifugation to remove debris before DNA extraction using PureLink viral RNA/DNA mini kit™ by Invitrogen and following the protocol recommended by the kit manufacturer for DNA extraction from the tissue samples. DNA concentration, purity, and integrity were verified by using a NanoDrop 2000c™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).

For bacterial DNA, we performed conventional PCR in a thermocycler ProFlex™ 3 x 32-well PCR System in a final 25-μl volume using OneTaq 2x MasterMix™ (New England Biolabs). For PCR we used specific primers: A. actinomycetemcomitans, forward: 5’ AAA CCC ATC TCT GAG TTC TTC TTC 3’ and reverse: 5’ ATG CCA ACT TGA CGT TAA AT 3’; P. gingivalis, forward: 5’ AGG CAG CTT GCC ATA CTG CGG 3’ and reverse: 5’ ACT GTT AGC AAC TAC CGA TGT 3’ 13; Prevotella intermedia, forward: 5’ TTT GTT GGG GAG TAA AGC GGG 3’ and reverse: 5’ TCA ACA TCT CTG TAT CCT GCG T 3’; and Tannerella forsythia, forward: 5’ GCG TAT GTA ACC TGC CCG CA 3’ and reverse: 5’TGC TTC AGT GTC AGT TAT ACC T 3’ 14.

Amplification was performed under the following conditions: Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, and reannealing 60 °C for 1 min; extension temperature at 72 °C for 1 min and 36 cycles. A small fraction (4 µl) of PCR products was mixed properly with 2 µl 6X DNA loading dye (Thermo Scientific), resolved at 90 V/cm on 1.5% agarose gel in 1X TAE buffer for 60 min using a 100 bp DNA ladder and visualized with SYBR Safe DNA Stain Gel™ (Invitrogen) under a UV light in a Spectroline Transilluminator™. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was identified by the presence of an amplified product in the 505 base pair (pb) band; P. gingivalis by an amplified product in the 404 pb band, P. intermedia by an amplified product in the 575 pb band, and T. forsythia by an amplified product in the 641 pb band.

For the viral genetic detection, a real-time PCR was carried out by using a Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch System™. The amplification was performed by using commercial kits: for Herpes simplex virus (HSV 1 & 2), the herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 DNA polymerase (UL30) gene - genesig standard kit; for Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), the human betaherpes virus 5 - cytomegalovirus, glycoprotein B (gB) gene - genesig standard kit, and for Epstein Barr virus (EBV), the Epstein Barr virus (human herpes virus 4) nonglycosylated membrane protein (BNRF1) - gene genesig advanced kit, which included a positive control template. We used Oasig lyophilised 2X qPCR MasterMixTM. The PCR cycling was performed at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 50 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and at 60 °C for 60 s. The R2 indices were higher than 0.900 in all measurements.

Statistical analysis

The frequency of periodontopathic microorganisms was recorded as a percentage. The results of oxidative stress markers were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons among groups were evaluated by using the Fischer exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Differences were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software.

Results

Table 1 shows the general socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population according to their periodontal status. The average age in patients with chronic periodontitis was higher while the proportion of males and females was similar; 87 patients were screened and diagnosed with chronic periodontitis with 5.6 ± 1.7 mm as the mean of periodontal depth pocket and 6.1 ± 3.1 mm as a mean of clinical attachment loss.

Table 1 Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the study subjects by periodontal status 

Variables Control Periodontitis
N 14 87
Age (years) 31±10 45±12
Sex [n (male), %] 6 (42.8) 45 (51.7)
Residence area [n (male), %]
Urban 9 (64.2) 42 (48.4)
Rural 5 (35.8) 45 (51.6)
Education level [n (male), %]
Primary school 0 9 (10.3)
Secondary school 4 (28.5) 30 (34.4)
Higher education 10 (71.5) 47 (54.0)
No response 0 1 (1.3)
Marital status [n (male), %]
Single 8 (57.1) 26 (29.8)
Married/Common law 5 (35.7) 51 (58.6)
Separated/divorced 1 (7.2) 9 (10.3)
No response 0 1 (1.3)
Socioeconomic status [n (male), %]
Low 6 (42.8) 67 (77.0)
Middle 8 (57.1) 20 (33.0)
Occupation [n (male), %]
Unemployed 0 13 (14.9)
Working 5 (35.7) 52 (59.7)
Student 9 (64.3) 2 (2.3)
Housewife 0 19 (21.8)
No response 0 1 (1.3)
PPD sampled sites
(median, media, mm ± S.D.) 2.1, 2.2±0.7 5.0, 5.6±1.7
CAL (median, mm ± S.D.) 1.0, 1.0±0.8 5.0, 6.1±3.1

PPD: Periodontal probing depth; CAL: Clinical attachment level

Table 2 shows the frequency of bacterial and viral periodontopathic microorganisms under evaluation. In all, 56.3% (n=49) of the patients with periodontitis were positive for any of the dental pathogens analyzed; A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis were the most prevalent periodontal pathogens in patients with periodontitis. Codetection of A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis was observed in three patients, but it was not related to the deepest pockets.

Table 2 Prevalence of periodontal pathogens according to the periodontal status 

Periodontal pathogen Control n (%) Periodontitis n (%) p value*
P. gingivalis 0 16 (18.6) 0.117
A. actinomycetemcomitans 3 (21.4) 30 (32.5) 0.539
T. forsythia 0 3 (3.5) 1.000
P. intermedia 0 1 (1.2) 1.000
Epstein-Barr virus 2 (14.2) 2 (2.3) 0.091
Human cytomegalovirus 0 0 -
Herpes virux simplex 1 & 2 1 (7.1) 0 0.138

Fischer exact test

Regarding viruses, the frequency of EBV, HSV 1 and 2, and HCMV in patients with periodontitis was 2.3%; EBV was detected in two patients with chronic periodontitis and EBV and HSV 1 and 2 were identified in two control subjects. The detection of viruses in periodontal pockets was low when there was no co-infection of herpesviruses and bacteria.

The most prevalent microorganisms were A. actinomycetemcomitans (32.5%) and P. gingivalis (18.6%). When we analyzed the distribution of periodontal pathogenic bacteria by residence area, we observed a significantly higher frequency of bacterial pathogens in patients living in rural areas compared with patients living in urban areas (figure 1).

*Fisher exact test=0.0027

Figure 1 Distribution of periodontal pathogens in patients with periodontitis according to their place of residence 

Among patients with periodontitis, 30 (34.5%) showed periodontal pockets with a depth of 4-5 mm and 57 (65.5%) with ≥6 mm. Porphyromonas gingivalis had a higher prevalence in patients with periodontal probing depth ≥6 mm; however, no statistically significant differences were observed (table 3).

Table 3 Relationship between periodontal probing depth and periodontal pathogens 

4-5 mm n (%) ≥ 6 mm n (%) p value*
n 30 57
P. gingivalis 3 (10.3) 13 (22.8) 0.245
A. actinomycetemcomitans 10 (33.3) 20 (35.1) 0.99

*Fischer exact test

Table 4 shows the mean salivary levels of MDA and total antioxidant capacity. The results showed that patients with chronic periodontitis had significantly higher levels of MDA and total antioxidant capacity compared with control subjects. No increase in markers of oxidative stress was observed in the presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans, the most prevalent periodontopathic bacteria in this sample of patients (figure 2).

Table 4 Analysis of oxidative stress markers according to periodontal status 

Marker Control Mean ± SD Periodontitis Mean ± SD p value
TAC mM 0.15 ± 0.1 0.32 ± 0.21 0.0036*
MDA µmol/g prot 0.46 ± 0.3 2.10 ± 1.54 0.0001*

TAC: Total antioxidant capacity; MDA: Salivary malondialdehyde

Comparison of periodontitis vs. control groups by t-test and U Mann-Whitney test

*Statistically significant differences (p<0.05)

Figure 2 Salivary levels of the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and salivary malondialdehyde (MDA) in subjects with presence or absence of A. actinomycetemcomitans 

Discussion

Porphyromonas gingivalis, P. intermedia, A. actinomycetemcomitans, T. forsythia, and T. denticola are the most common bacteria associated with the etiology and progression of periodontitis worldwide 15,16. The microbiological profile of the periodontitis they cause and their frequency of distribution differ among geographic regions 17,18 and vary depending on clinical factors such as the depth of the periodontal pockets 19.

In Colombia, previous studies have evaluated the microbial profile of the periodontal disease in various regions and in samples collected between 2003 and 2008 and concluded that the most prevalent periodontal pathogens were P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, and T. forsythia8,17,20,21. This study provides further and updated data about the periodontal bacteria and the human viruses associated with periodontitis in Colombian populations.

Our results showed that A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis were the bacteria most often detected in this population versus P. gingivalis, C. rectus, and T. forsythia, previously reported in patients in Bucaramanga 8. Although these periodontal pathogens showed a heterogeneous distribution in this population, P. gingivalis remains as one of the main bacteria associated with periodontitis and a reported marker for its progression 22. In our study, A. actinomycetemcomitans had the highest prevalence and was detected more in the rural population.

This microorganism is one of the bacterial pathogens related to periodontal disease and strongly associated with juvenile periodontitis 23, which is considered as the aggressive form of the disease; however, it has also been frequently isolated in chronic periodontitis patients 24 with stages 3 and 4, grade B, of the current classification, in those with juvenile gingivitis and even in healthy subjects 25. The presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans does not always determine a rapid rate of destruction 26 and it does not discriminate among periodontitis types or stages 27. The pocket depth, a healthy systemic condition in patients or the absence of other disease progression- determining factors may have conditioned our results.

Periodontopathic bacteria and viruses were detected in 48.5% of all subgingival samples, which could be considered low given previous findings in Colombian populations 8,17,20,28, and shows the importance of investigating other periodontal pathogens that might be present in the deepest periodontal pockets, as well as the difficulty to obtain adequate subgingival samples. Although many years ago it was demonstrated that “PCR is more accurate than conventional culture methods to identify these periodontal pathogens in subgingival plaque samples” 29, the PCR technique, like any other laboratory or diagnostic method, is influenced by internal and external factors such as the integrity of the samples and the DNA concentrations or DNA extraction methods and sample collection techniques. For this reason, we consider that in terms of isolation and detection of periodontal pathogens it is necessary to perform microbiological culture concomitantly with PCR. Culture allows for the detection of unknown pathogens in samples or increases the low concentration of fastidious bacteria DNA obtained due to variations in the amount of subgingival plaque or gingival crevicular fluid recovered from patients.

Other studies in Colombia have shown a higher frequency of viruses in periodontal pockets 28,30 using nested PCR was for virus detection while in our study, we used real-time PCR. PCR methods may have accounted for the differences observed. HCMV was not detected in our samples and the viruses detected showed no coinfection with bacteria. Several studies evaluating associations between periodontopathic bacteria and herpesviruses in patients with juvenile periodontitis have demonstrated that P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans tend to be more frequent in samples showing active infection by herpes viruses, especially HCMV 31,32.

Age is a recognized nonmodifiable risk factor associated with periodontitis 33. In our study, patients with periodontitis were older than in the comparison group, which agrees with general descriptions in other populations of patients with periodontal disease in developed and developing countries 34. In a previous study in Colombia, differences in terms of the frequency of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia and the socioeconomic status were found 20. Given that most of the population studied here belongs to a low socioeconomic status, our conclusions may be extended to this subset of the general population in Santander, where the distribution patterns of periodontal microorganisms may contribute to establishing focused treatment protocols. However, to reinforce such a conclusion a representative sample should be analyzed.

Regarding salivary markers of oxidative stress, this is the first report in Colombian patients with periodontitis. Whole saliva is an important physiologic fluid useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of many oral and systemic pathological conditions 35. Oxidative stress markers in saliva have shown to be a local indicator of the inflammation process, the progression of periodontitis 36, and the amount of periodontopathic bacteria in periodontal pockets 37.

Our aim was to determine the level of malondialdehyde as a marker of oxidative damage and total antioxidant activity in saliva according to the periodontal status. Our results are similar to those from previous studies 10,38-40 in the sense that oxidative stress in saliva increased in the periodontitis group as compared with the healthy control group.

The association between salivary oxidative stress markers and the presence of periodontal bacteria had shown a positive correlation before 41. We explored this relationship, but we did not observe a positive correlation between total antioxidant capacity and MDA levels in the presence of the most prevalent bacteria: A. actinomycetemcomitans. Similarly, and given the low frequency of P. gingivalis, it was not possible to correlate its presence with oxidative stress marker levels.

Oxidative stress is caused by the imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species and the activity of local endogenous antioxidants. Several studies have evaluated the total antioxidant capacity as an indicator of tissue response in periodontitis and have reported its decrease in the saliva of subjects with periodontitis 42 while in our study, we observed a higher salivary total antioxidant capacity . Su, et al. 43 found similar results, which would indicate that higher levels of total antioxidant capacity may be an adaptive response to oxidative stress in some groups of patients. However, unlike other studies, here the saliva samples were taken at two different moments of the day. Several factors can contribute to the variations in the salivary markers, such as the methods of saliva collection, the time of day, the intake of antioxidants, and tooth brushing, which can increase the total antioxidant capacity 6,44. Therefore, additional studies in this population controlling the bacterial load and time of the day for sampling should be conducted.

We can conclude that the patients with periodontitis under study showed differences in the prevalence of A. actinomycetemcomitans depending on the place of residence. We also confirmed the increasing levels of oxidative stress and antioxidant protection measured by MDA and total antioxidant capacity in the saliva of patients with periodontitis, regardless of the presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans.

Despite the above, further studies are needed in a larger number of patients to evaluate the presence of other pathogenic oral bacteria and to clarify the effect of bacterial presence on salivary oxidative stress, as well as the role of herpesvirusestypes in the region of Santander, Colombia.

Acknowledgements

We thank Fundación para el Desarrollo y Salud Rural Integral (FUDESI) for allowing us to participate in the health campaign No. 74 in Puerto Wilches, Santander. Our special thanks also go to the biotechnology laboratory of Fundación Cardiovascular de Santander, which together with Universidad Antonio Nariño allowed us to carry out the experimental component of the present study.

References

1. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet. 2005;366:1809- 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67728-8Links ]

2. Frencken JE, Sharma P, Stenhouse L, Green D, Laverty D, Dietrich T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis - a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44 (Suppl.18):S94-S105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12677Links ]

3. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990-2010: A systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res. 2014;93:1045-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514552491Links ]

4. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. IV Estudio Nacional de Salud Bucal ENSAB-IV 2013-2014. Bogotá: Minsalud; 2014. [ Links ]

5. Chapple IL, Bouchard P, Cagetti MG, Campus G, Carra MC, Cocco F, et al. Interaction of lifestyle, behaviour or systemic diseases with dental caries and periodontal diseases: Consensus report of group 2 of the joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(Suppl.18):S39-S51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12685Links ]

6. Wang Y, Andrukhov O, Rausch-Fan X. Oxidative stress and antioxidant system in periodontitis. Front Physiol. 2017;8:910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00910Links ]

7. Kumar J, Teoh SL, Das S, Mahakknaukrauh P. Oxidative stress in oral diseases: Understanding its relation with other systemic diseases. Front Physiol. 2017;8:693. http://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00693Links ]

8. Lafaurie GI, Contreras A, Barón A, Botero J, Mayorga-Fayad I, Jaramillo A, et al. Demographic, clinical, and microbial aspects of chronic and aggressive periodontitis in Colombia: A multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2007;78:629-39. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060187Links ]

9. Chapple IL, Matthews JB. The role of reactive oxygen and antioxidant species in periodontal tissue destruction. Periodontol 2000. 2007;43:160-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00178.xLinks ]

10. Banasova L, Kamodyova N, Jansakova K, Tothova L, Stanko P, Turna J, et al. Salivary DNA and markers of oxidative stress in patients with chronic periodontitis. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:201-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1236-zLinks ]

11. Slots J. Herpesviruses, the missing link between gingivitis and periodontitis? J Int Acad Periodontol. 2004;6:113-9. [ Links ]

12. Page RC, Eke PI. Case definitions for use in population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007;78(7Suppl.):1387-99. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060264Links ]

13. Ghizoni JS, Taveira LA, Garlet GP, Ghizoni MF, Pereira JR, Dionisio TJ, et al. Increased levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis are associated with ischemic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease in humans: An in vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:104-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000100019Links ]

14. Ashimoto A, Chen C, Bakker I, Slots J. Polymerase chain reaction detection of 8 putative periodontal pathogens in subgingival plaque of gingivitis and advanced periodontitis lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1996;11:266-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1996.tb00180.xLinks ]

15. Berezow AB, Darveau RP. Microbial shift and periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55:36-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00350.xLinks ]

16. Moore WE, Moore LV. The bacteria of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 1994;5:66-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00019.xLinks ]

17. Herrera D, Contreras A, Gamonal J, Oteo A, Jaramillo A, Silva N, et al. Subgingival microbial profiles in chronic periodontitis patients from Chile, Colombia and Spain. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:106-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01170.xLinks ]

18. Sanz M, van Winkelhoff AJ, Herrera D, Dellemijn-Kippuw N, Simon R, Winkel E. Differences in the composition of the subgingival microbiota of two periodontitis populations of different geographical origin. A comparison between Spain and The Netherlands. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:383-92. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005383.xLinks ]

19. Ximenez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27:648-57. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009648.xLinks ]

20. Mayorga-Fayad I, Lafaurie GI, Contreras A, Castillo DM, Barón A, Aya Mdel R. Subgingival microbiota in chronic and aggressive periodontitis in Bogotá, Colombia: An epidemiological approach. Biomédica. 2007;27:21-33. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v27i1.230Links ]

21. Ardila-Medina CM, Arbeláez-Montoya MI, Guzmán-Zuluaga IC. Perfil microbiológico subgingival de pacientes con periodontitis crónica en una población de Colombia. Avances en Periodoncia. 2012;24:47-53. [ Links ]

22. Kakuta E, Nomura Y, Morozumi T, Nakagawa T, Nakamura T, Noguchi K, et al. Assessing the progression of chronic periodontitis using subgingival pathogen levels: A 24-month prospective multicenter cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0337-xLinks ]

23. Zambon JJ, Christersson LA, Slots J. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal disease. Prevalence in patient groups and distribution of biotypes and serotypes within families. J Periodontol. 1983;54:707-11. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.12.707Links ]

24. Jardim Junior EG, Bosco JM, Lopes AM, Landucci LF, Jardim EC, Carneiro SR. Occurrence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in patients with chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, healthy subjects and children with gingivitis in two cities of the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:153-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572006000300001Links ]

25. Okada M, Hayashi F, Nagasaka N. Detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in dental plaque samples from children 2 to 12 years of age. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27:763-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027010763.xLinks ]

26. López NJ, Mellado JC, Leighton GX. Occurrence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia in juvenile periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23:101-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00541.xLinks ]

27. Mombelli A, Casagni F, Madianos PN. Can presence or absence of periodontal pathogens distinguish between subjects with chronic and aggressive periodontitis? A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(Suppl.3):10-21. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.1.xLinks ]

28. Botero JE, Parra B, Jaramillo A, Contreras A. Subgingival human cytomegalovirus correlates with increased clinical periodontal parameters and bacterial coinfection in periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007;78:2303-10. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070252Links ]

29. Riggio MP, Macfarlane TW, Mackenzie D, Lennon A, Smith AJ, Kinane D. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture methods for detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque samples. J Periodontal Res. 1996;31:496-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1996.tb01415.xLinks ]

30. Jaramillo A, Arce R, Contreras A, Herrera JA. Efecto del tratamiento periodontal sobre la microbiota subgingival en pacientes con preeclampsia. Biomédica. 2012;32:233-8. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v32i2.661Links ]

31. Michalowicz BS, Ronderos M, Camara-Silva R, Contreras A, Slots J. Human herpesviruses and Porphyromonas gingivalis are associated with juvenile periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2000;71:981-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.981Links ]

32. Cappuyns I, Gugerli P, Mombelli A. Viruses in periodontal disease - a review. Oral Dis. 2005;11:219-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01123.xLinks ]

33. Aljehani YA. Risk factors of periodontal disease: Review of the literature. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:9.https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/182513Links ]

34. Nazir MA. Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017;11:72-80. [ Links ]

35. Nunes LA, Mussavira S, Bindhu OS. Clinical and diagnostic utility of saliva as a non-invasive diagnostic fluid: A systematic review. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25:177-92. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.018Links ]

36. Onder C, Kurgan S, Altingoz SM, Bagis N, Uyanik M, Serdar MA, et al. Impact of non- surgical periodontal therapy on saliva and serum levels of markers of oxidative stress. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1961-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1984-zLinks ]

37. Sawamoto Y, Sugano N, Tanaka H, Ito K. Detection of periodontopathic bacteria and an oxidative stress marker in saliva from periodontitis patients. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005;20:216-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00215.xLinks ]

38. Ahmadi-Motamayel F, Goodarzi MT, Jamshidi Z, Kebriaei R. Evaluation of salivary and serum antioxidant and oxidative stress statuses in patients with chronic periodontitis: A case- control study. Front Physiol. 2017;8:189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00189Links ]

39. Khalili J, Biloklytska HF. Salivary malondialdehyde levels in clinically healthy and periodontal diseased individuals. Oral Dis. 2008;14:754-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01464.xLinks ]

40. Nguyen TT, Ngo LQ, Promsudthi A, Surarit R. Salivary lipid peroxidation in patients with generalized chronic periodontitis and acute coronary syndrome. J Periodontol. 2016;87:134- 41. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150353Links ]

41. Almerich-Silla JM, Montiel-Company JM, Pastor S, Serrano F, Puig-Silla M, Dasi F. Oxidative stress parameters in saliva and its association with periodontal disease and types of bacteria. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/653537Links ]

42. Brock GR, Butterworth CJ, Matthews JB, Chapple IL. Local and systemic total antioxidant capacity in periodontitis and health. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:515-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00509.xLinks ]

43. Su H, Gornitsky M, Velly AM, Yu H, Benarroch M, Schipper HM. Salivary DNA, lipid, and protein oxidation in nonsmokers with periodontal disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;46:914-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.01.008Links ]

44. Kamodyova N, Tothova L, Celec P. Salivary markers of oxidative stress and antioxidant status: Influence of external factors. Dis Markers. 2013;34:313-21. https://doi.org/10.3233/DMA-130975Links ]

Citation: Sánchez-Villamil JP, Pino-Vélez C, Trejos-Suárez J, Cardona N, España AL, Alfonso PA. Salivary markers of oxidative stress and periodontal pathogens in patients with periodontitis from Santander, Colombia. Biomédica. 2020;40(Supl. 1):113-24. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5149

Author contributions: Juana P Sánchez-Villamil conceived and designed the study, collected data, carried out real-time PCR assays, experimental analysis of oxidative stress markers, and the statistical analysis, interpretated data, and wrote the manuscript. Carolina Pino-Vélez collected the data and contributed to the contents of the manuscript. Juanita Trejos-Suárez carried out the conventional PCR assays and selected the PCR primers. Néstor Cardona collaborated in the real-time interpretation of data and the drafting and revision of the manuscript. Ana Lucía España and Pedro A. Alfonso collected the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: This work received funding from a call for projects in science, technology, and innovation at Universidad Antonio Nariño (Project code: 2107236).

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Received: July 29, 2019; Accepted: January 30, 2020

*Corresponding author: Juana Patricia Sánchez-Villamil, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Carrera 27 No 32-11, Bucaramanga, Colombia Telephone: (577) 634 9696 and (57) (310) 432 6523 juanipsan3@uan.edu.co

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License