SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue2An 18-year-old man with tropical verrucous syndrome: Leishmaniasis or sporotrichosis?Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in canines from a dog shelter in Bogotá, Colombia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Biomédica

Print version ISSN 0120-4157On-line version ISSN 2590-7379

Biomed. vol.41 no.2 Bogotá Apr./June 2021  Epub June 15, 2021

https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5623 

Original article

Seroprevalence of arboviruses in Ecuador: Implications for improved surveillance

Seroprevalencia de arbovirus en Ecuador: implicaciones para mejorar su vigilancia

Ernesto Gutiérrez-Vera1  ¥ 

Leandro Patiño1  2  * 

Martha Castillo-Segovia1  3 

Víctor Mora- Valencia1  4 

Julio Montesdeoca-Agurto1  ¥ 

Mary Regato-Arrata1  5 

1 Departamento de Virología, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez”, Guayaquil, Ecuador

2 Dirección Técnica de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez”, Guayaquil, Ecuador

3 Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador

4 Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital General Guasmo Sur, Guayaquil, Ecuador

5 Centro de Referencia Nacional de Virus Exantemáticos, Gastroentéricos y Transmitidos por vectores, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez”, Guayaquil, Ecuador

¥ Retired in 2012


Abstract

Introduction:

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) cause morbidity and mortality in humans and domestic animals worldwide. The percentage of population immunity or susceptibility to these viruses in Ecuador is unknown.

Objectives:

To investigate the proportion of Ecuadorian populations with IgG antibodies (Abs) (past exposure/immunity) and IgM Abs (current exposure) against flaviviruses and alphaviruses and to study the activity of these viruses in Ecuador.

Materials and methods:

During 2009-2011, we conducted a serosurvey for selected arboviruses in humans (n=1,842), equines (n=149), and sentinel hamsters (n=84) at two coastal locations and one in the Amazon basin (Eastern Ecuador) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition test.

Results:

From 20.63% to 63.61% of humans showed IgG-antibodies for the flaviviruses: Dengue virus (DENV), yellow fever virus (YFV) Saint Louis encephalitis virus, and West Nile virus (WNV); from 4.67% to 8.63% showed IgG-Abs for the alphaviruses: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, eastern equine encephalitis virus, and western equine encephalitis virus. IgM-Abs were found for DENV and WNV. Equines and hamsters showed antibodies to alphaviruses in all locations; two hamsters seroconverted to YFV in the Amazonia.

Conclusions:

The results show a YFV vaccination history and suggest the activity of arboviruses not included in the current surveillance scheme. Enhanced arbovirus and mosquito surveillance, as well as continued YFV vaccination and evaluation of its coverage/ effectiveness, are recommended.

Keywords: Arbovirus; yellow fever virus; West Nile virus; dengue virus; encephalitis virus, Venezuelan equine; encephalitis virus, Eastern equine.

Resumen

Introducción.

Los virus transmitidos por artrópodos (arbovirus) causan morbilidad y mortalidad en humanos y animales domésticos mundialmente. Se desconoce el porcentaje de inmunidad o vulnerabilidad de la población ecuatoriana ante estos virus.

Objetivos.

Investigar la proporción de poblaciones ecuatorianas con anticuerpos IgG (exposición o inmunidad pasada) y anticuerpos IgM (exposición reciente) contra flavivirus y alfavirus, e investigar su actividad en Ecuador.

Materiales y métodos.

Entre 2009 y 2011, se llevó a cabo una encuesta serológica para arbovirus en humanos (n=1.842), equinos (n=149) y hámsters centinela (n=84) en dos localidades costeras y en una en la Amazonía, utilizando la prueba ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) y la prueba de inhibición de la hemaglutinación.

Resultados.

Entre el 20,63 y el 63,61 % de los humanos registraron IgG contra el virus del dengue (DENV), el de la fiebre amarilla (YFV), el de la encefalitis de San Luis y el del Nilo Occidental (WNV); entre 4,67 y 8,63 % tenían IgG para los virus de la encefalitis equina venezolana, de la encefalitis equina del este y de la encefalitis equina del oeste.

Se encontró IgM para DENV y WNV. En los equinos y en los hámsters se encontraron anticuerpos contra alfavirus en todas las localidades muestreadas; dos hámsters mostraron seroconversión a YFV en la Amazonía.

Conclusiones.

Los resultados del estudio evidenciaron los antecedentes de vacunación contra el YFV y sugieren la actividad de arbovirus no incluidos en el esquema de vigilancia actual. Se recomienda ampliar la vigilancia de arbovirus y mosquitos, continuar con la vacunación contra el YFV, y evaluar su cobertura y efectividad.

Palabras clave: arbovirus; virus de la fiebre amarilla; virus del Nilo occidental; virus del dengue; virus de la encefalitis equina venezolana; virus de la encefalitis equina del este

Arbovirus is an ecological term applied to viruses transmitted by arthropods, particularly mosquitoes and ticks 1. Most arboviruses are maintained in enzootic cycles and are transmitted between mosquitos and vertebrates. Humans become infected and may develop diseases ranging from subclinical or mild infections to systemic febrile illness, hemorrhagic fever, and meningoencephalitis 1. Examples of arboviral diseases include yellow fever, Zika, and dengue fever, which have reemerged or increased their geographic range causing public health emergencies and urging governments to enhance their surveillance programs and research 2. Around 534 arboviruses have been described, and at least 135 of them are of medical concern 1,3. Almost all arboviruses have RNA genomes and are classified into nine families and nine genera 1,4; arbovirus species of current medical importance in South America belong to Flavivirus (Flaviviridae), Alphavirus (Togaviridae), and Orthobunyavirus (Perybunyaviridae) genera 4.

In Ecuador, three flaviviruses (yellow fever virus, YFV, dengue virus, DENV, and Zika virus, ZIKV) and two alphaviruses (Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, VEEV, and Chikungunya virus, CHIKV) have caused epidemic outbreaks 5-9. YFV has two well-recognized transmission cycles: urban and sylvatic 10. Recognized urban epidemics occurred in 1842, 1853-1856, 1867-1869, 1877-1878 and 1880 5. Urban YF was eradicated in Ecuador in 1919 11, but sylvatic YF has been documented since 1949 in Amazonian basin provinces 12,13. Vaccination campaigns against YFV have been conducted in Ecuador since 1944, particularly in the Amazonian and coastal provinces. DENV caused the first epidemic in 1988 6 and currently, it is the most commonly detected arbovirus 14. ZIKV and CHIKV are more recent introductions; the first epidemics by these viruses occurred in 2014 and 2016, respectively. VEEV has caused two major epidemics, one in 1969 and the other in 1972; as usual for this virus, epidemic outbreaks were preceded by an epizootic event in equines 7,15. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 1969 outbreak caused 20,000 cases and 200 fatalities in Ecuador 16. Subsequently, a major outbreak of VEEV was reported in Guatemala, Central America, northern México, and Texas in the United States of America. The introduction of the epidemic subtype from Ecuador to Guatemala was speculated, but no convincing mechanism was identified 17. Later, it was shown that the different outbreaks originated from a residual live virus in incompletely formalin-inactivated vaccines 18,19.

Other arboviruses of medical concern have also been reported in Ecuador. They include the Saint Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), the West Nile virus (WNV), and the Ilheus virus (ILHV) belonging to the Flavivirus genus; the eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV), the western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV), and the Mayaro virus (MAYV) from the Alphavirus genus, and the Oropouche virus (OROV) belonging to the Orthobunyavirus genus 20-24. SLEV, EEEV, and WEEV were isolated from sentinel hamsters and mosquitoes between 1974 and 1978 20. Then, SLEV as well as ILHV, OROV, MAYV, and VEEV were reported after the detection of specific antibodies (Abs) in febrile humans sampled in the Ecuadorian Amazonia in 1997 and between 2001 and 2004 23-25. ILHV and OROV were later isolated from febrile patients of the Ecuadorian Coast and the Amazonia, respectively 22,24. WNV and EEEV have been reported by the detection of specific Abs in horses of the Ecuadorean Coast: WNV from healthy equines sampled between 2007 and 2009 and EEEV from two equines showing neurological signs sampled in 2013 21,26. Eight other enzootic arboviruses have been isolated in Ecuador and named according to the local geographic region where they were found, but little is known about their medical importance 20. One example is the “Playas virus”, of which two strains (75V3066 and 75V938) are classified as Cache Valley virus and one (75V5758) as Maguari virus, both belonging to the genus Orthobunyavirus and associated with human disease 27.

Serosurveys are a key tool for determining the proportion of individuals exposed and of those with immunity to infectious agents, as well as for the detection of subclinical infections 28. In Ecuador, little is known about these aspects of arboviruses. The surveillance activities of the Ministerio de Salud Pública - MSP (Ministry of Public Health) are focused on the diagnosis of DENV, YFV, CHIKV, and ZIKV, mainly using nucleic acid detection; other arboviruses are surveyed using generic primers, a method with intrinsic limitations that may lead to missing arboviruses of medical concern. In this study, we aimed to investigate the proportion of three Ecuadorian populations with IgG Abs (past exposure/immunity) against selected flaviviruses and alphaviruses. This population included conscripts of a military fort of the Ecuadorian Amazonia recently vaccinated against YFV with the “YFV-17D” vaccine. We also determined the percentage of IgM Abs (recent exposure) against DENV and WNV in febrile and healthy individuals to look for clinical and subclinical infections. Finally, we emphasize the importance of widening and strengthening arbovirus surveillance in Ecuador.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This project was approved by the institutional review board of the Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez” (INHMTLI) now Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública. Human samples were collected under verbal informed consent. Domestic animals were sampled given owner consent and supervision. Hamsters were used as sentinel species in the field and suckling mice “Balb/C4” were required for inoculation of hamster tissue and mosquito pools. Hamsters and mice were grown and housed at the laboratory animal facility of INHMTLI, which has adequate infrastructure to guarantee animal welfare and dedicated personnel for cage cleaning and animal feeding. After exposure/inoculation, the animals were euthanized using chloroform as an inhaled anesthetic. All these procedures were performed in strict accordance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. We followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the “Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” published by the National Institute of Health of the United States of America.

Sampling and sampling location

This study comprised serum samples of humans and equines for arbovirus seroprevalence analysis, serum samples of hamsters for arbovirus seroconversion analysis, mosquito pools, and hamster tissues for viral isolation. Sampling was performed from 2009 to 2011 at three locations in Ecuador, two in the coastal region (Santa Elena Province-Manglaralto and Los Ríos Province-Vinces) and one in the Amazonia basin (Pastaza Province- Puyo) (figure 1). Manglaralto and Vinces were chosen for the presence of marshes and wetlands that contribute to the presence of mosquitoes. Puyo is in the Amazon rainforest, where many arboviruses circulate in their natural cycles. Hamsters were exposed as sentinel species at each sampling location for one week. During the study period, each location was visited six times, more or less every three months. The number of human samples collected by location is shown in figure 1. Detailed information on the number of human samples, sentinel hamsters, equines, and mosquitoes collected by location and date is shown in table S1.

Figure 1 Sampling sites and number of human samples collected. Santa Elena Province-Manglaralto (N=496), Los Ríos Province-Vinces (N=474), and Pastaza Province-Puyo (N=872: 293 civilians and 579 conscripts)  

The procedure for sampling humans and domestic animals is described by Beaty, et al. 29. The human population sampled was expected to have been vaccinated against YFV in different immunization campaigns. In one location (Puyo), we sampled conscripts of the Jungle Brigade 17 Pastaza (Amazonas Military Fort), who had all recently been vaccinated with YFV- 17D. Two different groups of conscripts were sampled three times during the year of their stay in the military fort to evaluate IgG Abs against YFV and their seroprevalence to other flaviviruses.

Mosquitoes were trapped with CDC light traps supplemented with CO230 and then frozen in dry ice and transported to the laboratory.

Laboratory analysis

Seroprevalence/seroconversion to arbovirus was evaluated mainly through the analysis of IgG Abs. For humans, each sample was analyzed against a battery of arboviruses comprising DENV, YFV, SLEV, WNV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV. Only monotypic results were considered positive for the corresponding virus. IgG Abs against DENV and WNV were evaluated by commercial ELISA methods of PANBIO (Windsor, Queensland, Australia, specificity 81.6 - 97.2% and sensitivity 73.9 - 85.1%) and FOCUS (Cypress, CA, USA, specificity 97% and sensitivity 36%), respectively. IgG Abs against YFV, SLEV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV were evaluated with in-house ELISAs following Johnson, et al.31. Sucrose-acetone-extracted suckling mouse brain antigens and positive serum against these viruses were donated by the CDC’s National Center of Infectious Diseases, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases (Fort Collins, CO, United States of America). IgM Abs against WNV and DENV were also analyzed in individuals who were febrile at the time of sampling or reported to be febrile one or two weeks before sampling (table S2). Since arboviruses also cause subclinical infections, IgM Abs against these viruses were further analyzed in a subset of nonfebrile individuals using commercial ELISAs of PANBIO (specificity: 85.4 - 98.9%; sensitivity: 46.6 - 64.7%) and FOCUS (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 100%), as described above. Positive and negative serum samples were included for the respective ELISA test. The IBM SPSS Statistics package for Windows, version XX (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA), was used for frequency analysis of monotypic samples according to individual age.

Equine and hamster IgG Abs were evaluated with the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test on kaolin-adsorbed sera according to the technique of Clarke, et al.32, adapted to microtiter plates and following the procedures described in the document Técnicas de laboratorio para el diagnóstico y la caracterización de los virus del dengue33. The test was conducted for EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV, and nine hamsters were also evaluated for YFV. We used the same antigens donated by the CDC. A shortage of antigens did not allow testing other arboviruses or more hamsters for YFV. An HI titer of 1:20 or higher inhibiting hemagglutination produced by four antigen units was considered positive. Hamsters 5-7 (table S1) were analyzed before and after their exposure at the sampling site 34. After exposure, hamsters were euthanized and their tissues (brain, heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and skeletal muscle) were processed for IC inoculation in suckling mice Balb/C4 and analyzed by RT-PCR.

Mosquitoes were identified, classified, and grouped by species. Spearman correlation was carried out using SPSS to test the relationship between the number of mosquitoes captured by species and location and the proportion of human samples showing IgG Abs reactive against the arboviruses tested. This nonparametric test was chosen given that the proportion of samples having Abs was calculated on categorical data (yes/no). Mosquitoes pooled by species in groups of 50 were crushed in a sterile environment and processed for intracerebral (IC) inoculation in suckling mice Balb/C4 and RT-PCR analysis.

RT-PCR for flaviviruses and alphaviruses was conducted on samples from febrile humans, hamster tissues, and mosquito pools according to Ayers, et al.35 and Sánchez-Seco, et al.36, respectively.

Results

Analysis of IgG Abs against selected arboviruses was performed on 1,842 human sera. We found Abs for all the viruses investigated: DENV, YFV, SLEV, WNV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV. The percentages of Abs against different arboviruses in 1,263 samples (without including conscripts) are shown in Table 1. The flaviviruses showed the highest seroprevalence with WNV (63.61%), followed by YFV (62.67%), SLEV (52.29%), and DENV (20.63%); the alphaviruses showed the lowest prevalence, particularly WEEV (4.67%). Some samples reacted with only one of the viruses tested (monotypic samples): WNV: 58, SLEV: 20, EEEV: 54, VEEV: 64, and WEEV: 18. The frequency of monotypic samples according to the age of the patient is shown in figures S1-S5. Individuals between 2 and 82 years of age showed monotypic reactions.

Table 1 Percentages of Abs against the arbovirus evaluated in the civilian population (conscripts not included), N=1,223 to 1,263. The number of samples analyzed varied depending on sample or reagent availability. 

Virus Percentage (Positivies/analyzed)
DENV 20,63 (260/1,260)
YFV 62,67 (769/1,227)
SLEV 51,29 (635/1,238)*
WNV 63,61 (778/1,223)*
EEEV 8,63 (109/1,263)*
WEEV 4,67 (59/1,263)*
VEEV 7,60 (96/1,263)*

DENV: Dengue virus, YFV: Yellow fever Virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis Virus, WNV: West Nile encephalitis Virus, EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus, WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus, VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus

* There were monotipic results as follows: WNV 69 (34 Vinces, 21 Manglaralto, and 14 Puyo); SLEV 20 (5 Vinces, 2 Manglaralto, 13 Puyo); EEEV (11 Vinces, 39 Manglaralto, 4 Puyo); WEEV (3 Vinces, 10 Manglaralto, 5 Puyo); VEEV (25 Vinces, 23 Manglaralto, 16 Puyo).

The results of IgG analysis by location are shown in figure 2. A total of 474 samples were studied in Vinces; the highest seroprevalence was found for WNV, 63.59% (276/434), and the lowest was for WEEV, 4.85% (23/474). In Manglaralto, we screened 496 samples. The highest seroprevalence was found for WNV, 87.7% (435/496), and the lowest for WEEV, 5.84% (29/496). In Puyo, we analyzed 872 samples comprising 293 samples from the civilian population and 579 from conscripts. For the civilian population, the highest seroprevalence was found for YFV, 52.75% (153/290), and the lowest for WEEV, 2.38% (7/293). Puyo is one of the Amazonian provinces subject to regular YFV vaccination.

Figure 2 Percentage of civilian people with IgG Abs against selected flaviviruses and alphaviruses in three locations of Ecuador, method used: ELISA. DENV: Dengue virus, YFV: Yellow fever virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis virus, WNV: West Nile virus, EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus, WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus, VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus 

The percentage of conscripts with IgG Abs against arbovirus is shown in figure 3a and b. Two groups (group 1: 61 individuals and group 2: 67 individuals) recently vaccinated against YFV were sampled three times. For group 1, the percentage of response to the vaccine was 85.05% and between 23.15% and 37.84% showed Abs against DENV, WNV, and SLEV. In group 2, 81.31% showed Abs against YFV, and between 5.90% and 42.74% showed Abs against DENV, WNV, and SLEV.

Figure 3 Percentage of conscripts developing IgG Abs against YFV and other selected flaviviruses during the year after being vaccinated with YFV- 17D. Two groups of conscripts (a and b) from the Amazonian Military Fort “Selva Pastaza 17” were sampled and analyzed for the mentioned virus at three different times of the year. The percentage of conscripts with Abs against YFV increased with time. Method used, ELISA. WNV: West Nile virus; DENV: Dengue virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis virus, YFV: Yellow fever virus. a) First group of conscripts. b) Second group of conscripts. Each bar shows the increasing percentage of Abs for each virus during the three sampling periods. 

A total of 102 individuals were registered as febrile and analyzed for IgM Abs against WNV and DENV, and the detailed results are shown in Table S2. Four individuals from Puyo (30.76%-4/13) showed IgM Abs reactive against DENV, one in the civilian population, and three in the second group of conscripts (two were positive in the second sampling and the other in the third sampling). Two samples showed monotypic IgM Abs-reactive against WNV: one from a 19-year-old female in Vinces (1.66%-1/60) and another from a 53- year old woman in Manglaralto (5.55% -1/18).

A total of 1,343 samples of nonfebrile individuals (including conscripts) were analyzed for IgM Abs against DENV of which 5.06% (18/356) in Vinces, 2.42% (12/496) in Manglaralto, and 7.94% (39/491) in Puyo showed Abs. A total of 893 samples of nonfebrile individuals (including conscripts) analyzed for IgM Abs against WNV demonstrated 0.20% (1/496) positivity from Manglaralto and 0.20% (1/491) positivity from Puyo.

The HI results are shown in tables S3 and S4; 149 equines were analyzed. Hemagglutination-inhibiting Abs were found for all the antigens evaluated at serum dilutions of 1:20-1:1280. Counting the monotypic results and the highest dilution showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination in heterotypic reactions, 1.34% (2/149) of equines demonstrated Abs to EEEV, 5.37% (8/149) to WEEV, and 6.04% (9/149) to VEEV across all sampling sites. Abs to EEEV were found in Vinces, Abs to WEEV were detected in Vinces and Manglaralto, and Abs against VEEV were detected in all the locations sampled. Hemagglutination-inhibiting Abs at higher serum dilutions were found for WEEV in one animal in Vinces (1:1280) (table S3).

A total of 84 hamsters were used as sentinels. After exposure in the field, 22.62% of them demonstrated Abs to EEEV (18.51% -5/27 in Vinces, 15.63% -5/32 in Manglaralto, and 25.71% -9/35 in Puyo), 20.24% showed Abs to VEEV (7.41% -2/27 in Vinces, 31.25% -10/32 in Manglaralto, and 20% -7/35 in Puyo), and 2.38% seroconverted to YFV (22.22% -2/9 in Puyo) (table S4). Hemagglutination-inhibiting Abs at higher serum dilutions were found for YFV in one hamster in Puyo (1:640) and for EEEV in two hamsters in Manglaralto (1:1280). None of the hamsters became sick.

A total of 73,505 mosquitoes were captured. The number by locality and species is described in table S5. The most common species was Culex (Mel) spp. (N=63.057). The most abundant by location were Culex (Mel) spp. in Vinces (N=62.736), Aedes (Stg) aegypti in Manglaralto (N=912), and Coquillettidia venezuelensis in Puyo (N=160). Correlation results are shown in table S6. There was a very strong negative correlation (ρ=-1, p≥0.1) between Psorophora ferox and samples with Abs against DENV, SLEV, WNV, EEV, WEEV, and between C. venezuelensis or A. albimanus and samples showing Abs for YFV (ρ=-1 p≥0.1). A strong positive correlation was found between Mansonia pseudotitilians/indubitans or Anopheles (Nys) triannulatus and the proportion of individuals showing Abs against VEEV (ρ=1, p≥0.1). There was a positive correlation between A. aegypti and DENV, SLEV, WNV, EEV, and WEEV, but it was not significant. A list of mosquito species identified in this study and the arboviruses they harbor according to viral isolation studies elsewhere is shown in table S7.

RT-PCR analysis of 128 mosquito pools and 119 hamster tissues did not lead to the amplification of Flavivirus or Alphavirus RNA.

We inoculated 807 suckling Balb/C mice, 576 with hamster tissue and 231 with suspensions of polled mosquitoes. No virus was isolated.

Discussion

Serosurvey of arboviruses is constrained by Ab cross-reactivity because of antigenic similarities between members of the same virus family cocirculating in the same region. The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is the gold standard for the specific detection of Abs, but it is difficult to implement in resource-limited countries. ELISA and HIA tests are valuable alternatives when monotypic results are accounted for. Using these techniques, we report the percentage of individuals with IgG Abs reactive against DENV, YFV, WNV, SLEV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV and with IgM Abs reactive against DENV and WNV. We found monotypic results for WNV, SLEV, and each of the encephalitis viruses evaluated while the frequency was found in individuals of different ages. We also demonstrated the seroconversion of naive sentinel hamsters to the EEEV and VEEV in all sampling locations and for YFV in Amazonia. Mosquito genera recognized as vectors of arboviruses were found in all locations studied. We discuss our findings in the context of arboviruses whose activity has been confirmed in Ecuador and with the current surveillance schemes.

Monotypic IgG Abs against WNV were found in Manglaralto-Santa Elena Province and Vinces-Los Ríos Province (N=58: 34 Vinces, 24 Manglaralto). IgM Abs against this virus were also found in two IgG-positive samples, one from Manglaralto and one from Vinces. The result in Vinces is consistent with the finding of specific IgG Abs against this virus in equines sampled during 2007-2009 by Coello 21; thus, it is probable that WNV infection occurred in humans in this region during these years. The confirmation of human infection would require the use of PNRT; however, these findings warrant further investigation of the activity of this virus in humans, vectors, and potential reservoirs. Serosurvey of birds in Guayaquil (a coastal city around 100 km from Vinces) did not find evidence of WNV infection at this location during 2011 37. Analysis of SLEV showed 20 monotypic results (2 in Manglaralto, 13 in Puyo, and 5 in Vinces). From 1974 to 1978, SLEV was isolated on the Ecuadorian Coast from Culex nigripalpus mosquitoes (isolated 76 V-1177 and 24684) collected in Huertas Negras-Tenguel/Guayas and Puerto Nuevo- Vinces/Los Ríos and sentinel hamsters (isolated 78V-5682) exposed in Playas/Guayas (20). From 2001 to 2004, specific IgM Abs against this virus were found in febrile patients sampled from Ecuadorian Amazonia 25.

A higher percentage of Abs was found against YFV, which was probably due to YFV vaccination history. Overall, the civilian population showed ~60% Abs against YFV, with Puyo showing a higher percentage of civilian people with YFV Abs (52.75%). In conscripts, the percentage of Abs was between 81.31% and 85.05%, which is not optimal but agrees with vaccine efficacy percentages 38,39. Two hamsters seroconverted to YFV in Puyo, which added to the cases of sylvatic yellow fever occurring in Ecuadorian Amazonia showing the active circulation of the virus in this region and the presence of susceptible people. According to information provided by the MSP, mass preventive YFV vaccination in Ecuador was performed in 1944, 1975, 1997, 2005, and 2016, and data about routine immunization of infants have been publicly available since 2007 40. A worldwide analysis of YFV vaccination from 1970 to 2016 41 shows a cumulative vaccination coverage of ~ 60% in the Ecuadorian Amazonia and of ~ 30% in the entire country and recommends reaching the 80% threshold to prevent or control outbreaks.

Regarding Alphavirus, we found IgG Abs reactive against VEEV, EEEV, and WEEV in humans and equines and Abs to VEEV and EEEV in naive hamsters. All these viruses were isolated in Ecuador by Calisher, et al. between 1974 and 1978 20. VEEV comprises six antigenic subtypes (I-VI) of which I-AB and I-C are associated with epizootic/epidemic activity in equines and humans while other serotypes circulate in natural enzootic cycles 42. The epidemic subtype IB (now I-AB) and the enzootic 1-D have been reported in Ecuador; IB, in particular, was reported from a horse showing neurological disease in 1944 and during the outbreak of 1969 7. The isolates from 1969 were antigenically similar to those causing outbreaks in Central and North America 42 and likely originated from incompletely formalin-inactivated vaccines 18,19. IgM Abs against VEEV have been detected in Ecuadorian individuals since 1958, then in 1960, and from febrile patients sampled during 2000-2004 7. The emergence of epizootic/epidemic strains from enzootic VEEV has also been shown and justifies surveillance attention 43,44. For EEEV, specific IgM Abs were detected in two equines showing neurological signs from Chongón, Guayas Province, in 2013 26. EEEV circulating in South America is now known as Madariaga virus45 and has been linked to neurologic disease in humans and horses 46. WEEV has not been reported to cause epizootics or epidemics in Ecuador.

As regards mosquitoes, most of the species/genera identified in this study are known vectors of arboviruses elsewhere (table S7). For example, some Culex species are vectors of WNV, SLEV, and VEEV, and the presence of these mosquitoes in all locations is consistent with the finding of Abs against the viruses they transmit. A. aegypti, the main vector of DENV, was found only in Manglaralto, although Abs against dengue were found in all locations. The absence of this mosquito species in the other locations studied could be due to sampling bias; in Manglaralto, traps were placed near human settlements and in Puyo and Vinces they were placed in more forested areas. Correlation data between species and the proportion of human individuals showing IgG Abs against arbovirus should be interpreted with caution because few locations were analyzed (N=3). Anopheles nuneztovari has not been reported in Ecuador before, but this species is difficult to identify and will need further confirmation. Anopheles are not usual vectors for arboviruses, but the finding of unreported species highlights the importance of carrying out more studies on mosquitoes.

By 2009-2012, arboviral surveillance in Ecuador comprised DENV and YFV through ELISA and nucleic acid detection. After the arrival of ZIKV and CHIKV and the confirmation of OROV, the surveillance was extended to these viruses. Following our results, a percentage of negative samples are currently analyzed for VEEV, EEEV, and MAYV by RT-PCR. Given the emergence and reemergence of arboviral diseases worldwide and their continuous spread, we strongly recommend widening the analysis and surveillance of other arboviruses, especially those isolated previously or detected in febrile patients in the country. These must include the arbovirus surveyed here but also the ILHV and the Playas virus. This last virus, isolated in Ecuador in 1974-1978, is genetically similar to the Cache Valley virus and the Maguari virus, which have been reported to cause human disease. Likewise, we emphasize the need for updated studies and surveillance of mosquito ecology and their vectorial capacity for arbovirus transmission.

We also urge for the establishment of a set of recommendations given by the Global Arbovirus Group of Experts (GAGE) 47, which include strengthening laboratory capacity through the implementation of multiplex diagnostic tests reliable for differential diagnosis, access to viral isolation, sequencing, and genotyping, and encouraging the development of research programs to study the mechanism of arboviral evolution, emergence, and dispersal. Implementation of viral isolation would allow phenotypic characterization and availability of reagents for serological studies, which, in its turn, will reduce the dependence on international reference centers for local diagnosis 48. A constraint of this research was the lack of a local method for the specific analysis of Abs, such as PNRT, which requires cell culture, a procedure used intermittently by the MSP surveillance laboratories. Sequencing and genotyping could now be approached through genomic technologies, whole genome sequencing, and the simultaneous analysis of several samples making it useful for rapid outbreak investigations, viral phylogeography, and evolutionary studies 49-51. Improving epidemiological surveillance and implementation of the recommendations provided by the GAGE could be achieved locally and regionally by promoting collaboration between public laboratories and academia, as recommended by Miranda, et al.52; this approach would be particularly useful for developing countries where infrastructure and technical and economic resources are scarce.

Acknowledgments

We thank Aracely Alava, ex-Director of the Virology Department of INHMTLIP and Charles Calisher, Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University, USA for providing logistic support and scientific advice; Laura Kramer, Director of the Arbovirus Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center of New York, for her critical reading of the manuscript; Michelle Kalamandeen for her help with maps, and Virginia Burgos and Nancy Cajas for performing some of the ELISA tests. Antigens for in-house ELISAs were provided by the CDC, Fort Collins.

References

1. Gubler DJ, Vasilakis N. The Arboviruses: Quo Vadis? Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2016. p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.21775/9781910190210.01Links ]

2. Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Weaver SC, Monath TP, Heymann DL, Scott TW. Epidemic arboviral diseases: Priorities for research and public health. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:e101-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30518-7Links ]

3. Karabatsos N. International catalogue of arboviruses, including certain other viruses of vertebrates. San Antonio, Tex.: American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene for the Subcommittee on Information Exchange of the American Committee on Arthropod-borne Viruses; 1985. [ Links ]

4. Mayer SV, Tesh RB, Vasilakis N. The emergence of arthropod-borne viral diseases: A global prospective on dengue, chikungunya and zika fevers. Acta Trop. 2017;166:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.020Links ]

5. Borja Lavayen C. La fiebre amarilla. Apuntes sobre la epidemia de 1880. In: La fiebre amarilla y los médicos de Guayaquil. Quito: Banco Central del Ecuador; 1987. p. 11-81. [ Links ]

6. Alava AA, Mosquera C, Vargas W, Real J. Dengue en el Ecuador 1989-2002. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop. 2005;42:11-34. [ Links ]

7. Gutierrez VE, Monath TP, Alava AA, Uriguen BD, Arzube RM, Chamberlain R. Epidemiologic investigations of the 1969 epidemic of Venezuelan encephalitis in Ecuador. Am J Epidemiol. 1975;102:400-13. [ Links ]

8. Dirección Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica-MSP. Enfermedades transmitidas por vectores. Fiebre Chikungunya. Semana epidemiológica 52/2018. Accessed: August 15, 2020. Available from: Available from: https://www.salud.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/GACETA-VECTORES-SE-52.pdfLinks ]

9. Dirección Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica-MSP. Zika. Semana epidemiológica 52/2018. Accessed: August 15, 2020. Available from: Available from: https://www.salud.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/GACETA-VECTORES-SE-52.pdfLinks ]

10. Monath TP. Yellow fever: An update. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00016-0Links ]

11. Becerra L. Informe del Director de Sanidad Publica. N 195. Al Ministro de lo Interior y Sanidad. Guayaquil 27 de mayo. In: Guayaquil: 1740-1919 Crónica y reflexiones epidemiológicas sobre la fiebre amarilla en la ciudad. Guayaquil: Facultad de Ciencias Psicológicas, Universidad de Guayaquil; 2004. p. 165-6. [ Links ]

12. García E. La fiebre amarilla en Ecuador. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop. 1953;10:1-7. [ Links ]

13. Dirección Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica-MSP. Enfermedades transmitidas por vectores Ecuador, SE 01- 27 - 2020. Accessed: August 16, 2020. Available from: Available from: https://www.salud.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ETV-SE-27.pdfLinks ]

14. Dirección Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica-MSP. Enfermedades transmitidas por vectores. Dengue. SE01-31/2020. Accessed: August 15, 2020. Available from Available from https://www.salud.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Vectores-SE-31.pdfLinks ]

15. Gutiérrez VE. Encefalitis venezolana en el Ecuador. Brote epizoodémico de 1972. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop. 1977;30:169-88. [ Links ]

16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Venezuelan equine encephalitis. Arbovirus Catalog. Accessed: August 15, 2020. Available from: Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/arbocat/VirusDetails.aspx?ID=507&SID=10Links ]

17. Young NA. Origin of epidemics of Venezuelan equine encephalitis. J Infect Dis. 1972;125:565-7. [ Links ]

18. Kinney RM, Tsuchiya KR, Sneider JM, Trent DW. Molecular evidence for the origin of the widespread Venezuelan equine encephalitis epizootic of 1969 to 1972. J Gen Virol. 1992;73:3301-5. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-73-12-3301Links ]

19. Weaver SC, Pfeffer M, Marriott K, Kang W, Kinney RM. Genetic evidence for the origins of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus subtype IAB outbreaks. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:441-8. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.441Links ]

20. Calisher CH, Gutierrez VE, Francy DB, Alava AA, Muth DJ, Lazuick JS. Identification of hitherto unrecognized arboviruses from Ecuador: Members of serogroups B, C, Bunyamwera, Patois, and Minatitlan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:877-85. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.877Links ]

21. Coello R. Presencia del virus del Nilo occidental en equinos (Equus caballus) de dos humedales de la Provincia de los Rios, ano 2007 al 2009. Revista de la Universidad de Guayaquil. 2011;111:15-22. [ Links ]

22. Johnson BW, Cruz C, Felices V, Espinoza WR, Manock SR, Guevara C, et al. Ilheus vírus isolate from a human, Ecuador. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:956. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1306.070118Links ]

23. Izurieta R, Macaluso M, Watts D, Tesh R, Guerra B, Cruz L, et al. Hunting in the rainforest and Mayaro virus infection: An emerging alphavirus in Ecuador. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011;3:317. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-777x.91049Links ]

24. Wise EL, Pullan ST, Marquez S, Paz V, Mosquera JD, Zapata S, et al. Isolation of oropouche virus from febrile patient, Ecuador. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:935. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2405.171569Links ]

25. Manock SR, Jacobsen KH, De Bravo NB, Russell KL, Negrete M, Olson JG, et al. Etiology of acute undifferentiated febrile illness in the Amazon basin of Ecuador. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:146-51. [ Links ]

26. World Organization for Animal Health-OIE. Encefalomielitis equina del este, Ecuador. 2013. Accessed: August 15, 2020. Available from: Available from: https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review?page_refer=MapFullEventReport&reportid=13534&newlang=esLinks ]

27. Groseth A, Vine V, Weisend C, Guevara C, Watts D, Russell B, et al. Maguari virus associated with human disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1325. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2308.161254Links ]

28. Metcalf CJE, Farrar J, Cutts FT, Basta NE, Graham AL, Lessler J, et al. Use of serological surveys to generate key insights into the changing global landscape of infectious disease. Lancet. 2016;388:728-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30164-7Links ]

29. Beaty BJ, Calisher CH, Shope RE. Arboviruses. En: Lennette EH, Lennette DA, Lennette ET, editors. Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial, and chlamydial infections. 7th edition. Washington: American Public Health Association 1995; p.189-212. [ Links ]

30. Sudia WD, Chamberlain RW. Battery-operated light trap, an improved model. Mosq News. 1962;22:126-9. [ Links ]

31. Johnson AJ, Martin DA, Karabatsos N, Roehrig JT. Detection of anti-arboviral immunoglobulin G by using a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1827-31. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.38.5.1827-1831.2000Links ]

32. Casals J. Immunological techniques for animal viruses. In: Methods in virology. New York: Elsevier; 1967. p. 113-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3219-5.50010-XLinks ]

33. Instituto de Medicina Tropical Pedro Kouri. Técnicas de laboratorio para el diagnostico y la caracterización de los virus del dengue. Habana: Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kouri”; 2013. [ Links ]

34. Sudia WD, Lord RD, Hayes RO. Collection and processing of vertebrate specimens for arbovirus studies. Atlanta: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1970. p. 28-46. [ Links ]

35. Ayers M, Adachi D, Johnson G, Andonova M, Drebot M, Tellier R. A single tube RT-PCR assay for the detection of mosquito-borne flaviviruses. J Virol Methods. 2006;135:235-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.03.009Links ]

36. Sanchez-Seco MP, Rosario D, Quiroz E, Guzman G, Tenorio A. A generic nested-RT-PCR followed by sequencing for detection and identification of members of the alphavirus genus. J Virol Methods. 2001;95:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00306-8Links ]

37. Eastwood G, Goodman SJ, Hilgert N, Cruz M, Kramer LD, Cunningham AA. Using avian surveillance in Ecuador to assess the imminence of West Nile virus incursion to Galapagos. Ecohealth. 2014;11:53-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0911-5Links ]

38. Guerra HL, Sardinha TM, da Rosa AP, Lima e Costa MF. Effectiveness of the yellow fever vaccine 17D: An epidemiologic evaluation in health services. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 1997;2:115-20. [ Links ]

39. Staples JE, Gershman M, Fischer M. Yellow fever vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010:59;1-27. [ Links ]

40. World Health Organization. Ecuador: WHO and UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage: 2019 revision. Accessed: August 15, 2020. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/ecu.pdfLinks ]

41. Shearer FM, Moyes CL, Pigott DM, Brady OJ, Marinho F, Deshpande A, et al. Global yellow fever vaccination coverage from 1970 to 2016: An adjusted retrospective analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:1209-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30419-XLinks ]

42. Franck PT, Johnson KM. An outbreak of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis in Central America: Evidence for exogenous source of a virulent virus subtype. Am J Epidemiol. 1971;94:487-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121346Links ]

43. Rico-Hesse R, Weaver SC, De Siger J, Medina G, Salas RA. Emergence of a new epidemic/epizootic Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus in South America. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1995;92:5278-81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.12.5278Links ]

44. Forrester NL, Wertheim JO, Dugan VG, Auguste AJ, Lin D, Adams AP, et al. Evolution and spread of Venezuelan equine encephalitis complex alphavirus in the Americas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005693. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005693Links ]

45. Arrigo NC, Adams AP, Weaver SC. Evolutionary patterns of eastern equine encephalitis virus in North versus South America suggest ecological differences and taxonomic revision. J Virol. 2010;84:1014-25. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01586-09Links ]

46. Carrera JP, Forrester N, Wang E, Vittor AY, Haddow AD, Lopez-Verges S, et al. Eastern equine encephalitis in Latin America. N Engl J Med. 2013;22;369:732-44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1212628Links ]

47. Espinal MA, Andrus JK, Jauregui B, Waterman SH, Morens DM, Santos JI, et al. Emerging and reemerging aedes-transmitted arbovirus infections in the region of the Americas: Implications for health policy. Am J Public Health. 2019;109:387-92. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304849Links ]

48. Calisher CH, Blair CD, Bowen MD, Casals J, Drebot MA, Henchal EA, et al. Identification of arboviruses and certain rodent-borne viruses: Reevaluation of the paradigm. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:756. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0704.010431Links ]

49. Faria NR, Kraemer MU, Hill SC, De Jesus JG, Aguiar RS, Iani FC, et al. Genomic and epidemiological monitoring of yellow fever virus transmission potential. Science. 2018;361:894-9. https://doi.org/1126/science.aat7115Links ]

50. Holmes EC. RNA virus genomics: A world of possibilities. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2488-95. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38050Links ]

51. Coffey LL, Page BL, Greninger AL, Herring BL, Russell RC, Doggett SL, et al. Enhanced arbovirus surveillance with deep sequencing: Identification of novel rhabdoviruses and bunyaviruses in Australian mosquitoes. Virology. 2014;448:146-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2013.09.026Links ]

52. Miranda JJ, Castro-Avila AC, Salicrup LA. Advancing health through research partnerships in Latin America. BMJ. 2018;16;362:k2690. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2690Links ]

1. Zavortink TJ, Roberts DR, Hoch AL. Trichoprosopon digitatum-Morphology, biology, and potential medical importance. Mosq Syst. 1983;15:141-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjx254Links ]

2. Harbach R. Genus Trichoprosopon Theobald, 1901. Accessed: August 16th, 2020. Available from: http://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.info/genus-emtrichoprosoponem-theobald-1901Links ]

3. Harbach R. Culex Linnaeus, 1758. Accessed: August 16th, 2020. Available from: Available from: http://mosquito-taxonomicinventory.info/simpletaxonomy/term/6165Links ]

4. Pinheiro F, Pinheiro M, Bensabath G, Causey O, Shope R. Epidemia de virus Oropouche em Belem. Rev Serv Espec Sau Pub. 1962;12:15-23 [ Links ]

5. Cardoso JC, de Almeida MAB, dos Santos E, da Fonseca DF, Sallum MAM, Noll CA, et al. Yellow fever virus in Haemagogus leucocelaenus and Aedes serratus mosquitoes, Southern Brazil, 2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1918-24. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1612.100608Links ]

6. Vieira CJ, Andrade CD, Kubiszeski JR, Silva DJ, Barreto ES, Massey AL, et al. Detection of Ilheus virus in mosquitoes from southeast Amazon, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019;113:424-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trz031. [ Links ]

7. Calisher CH, Gutierrez VE, Francy DB, Alava AA, Muth DJ, Lazuick JS. Identification of hitherto unrecognized arboviruses from Ecuador: members of serogroups B, C, Bunyamwera, Patois, and Minatitlan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:877-85. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.877Links ]

8. Mitchell CJ, Monath TP, Sabattini MS, Daffner JF, Cropp CB, Calisher CH, et al. Arbovirus isolations from mosquitoes collected during and after the 1982-1983 epizootic of western equine encephalitis in Argentina. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;36:107-13. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.107Links ]

9. De Lopes OS, De Sacchetta LA, Francy DB, Jakob WL, Calisher CH. Emergence of a new arbovirus disease in Brazil: III. Isolation of Rocio virus from Psorophora ferox (Humboldt, 1819). Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113:122-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113075Links ]

10. Mendez W, Liria J, Navarro JC, Garcia CZ, Freier JE, Salas R, et al. Spatial dispersion of adult mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a sylvatic focus of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. J Med Entomol. 2001;38:813-21. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-38.6.813Links ]

11. Aitken THG, Downs WG, Anderson CR, Spence L, Casals J. Mayaro virus isolated from a Trinidadian mosquito, Mansonia venezuelensis. Science. 1960;131:986. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3405.986Links ]

12. Bosch I, Herrera F, Navarro JC, Lentino M, Dupuis A, Maffei J, et al. West Nile virus, Venezuela. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:651-3. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1304.061383Links ]

13. Cevallos V, Ponce P, Waggoner JJ, Pinsky BA, Coloma J, Quiroga C, et al. Zika and Chikungunya virus detection in naturally infected Aedes aegypti in Ecuador. Acta Trop. 2018;177:74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.09.029Links ]

Citation: Gutiérrez-Vera E, Patiño-Patiño LD, Castillo-Segovia M, Mora-Valencia V, Montesdeoca-Agurto J, Regato- Arrata M. Seroprevalence of arboviruses in Ecuador: Implications for improved surveillance. Biomédica. 2021;41:247-59. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5623

Funding:

This work was funded by the Secretaría Nacional de Educación Superior, Ciencia,Tecnología e Innovación del Ecuador (SENESCYT: proyecto PIC- 08-IZP-00002) granted to Dr. Ernesto Gutiérrez Vera, researcher of the Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez”.

SUPPLEMENTARY FILES

Figure S1 Frequency of monotypic samples of WNV according to patient age 

Figure S2 Frequency of monotypic samples of SLEV according to patient age 

Figure S3 Frequency of monotypic samples of VEEV according to patient age 

Figure S4 Frequency of monotypic samples of WEEV according to according to patient age. 

Figure S5 Frequency of monotypic samples of EEEV according to according to patient age 

Table S1 Number of samples of humans, sentinel hamsters, equines, and mosquitoes collected by location and date 

Location* Collection date Samples
Humans Sentinel Hamsters Esquines Mosquitoes
Vinces 9-13/3/09 115 5 0 278
Manglaralto 25-27/3/09 54 5 15 266
Vinces 25-30/5/09 120 5 20 722
Puyo 7-11/9/09 244 7 0 34
Manglaralto 21-25/9/09 129 7 21 243
Puyo 26-30/10/09 149 7 10 8
Vinces 1-5/02/2010 39 6 0 65,318
Manglaralto 22-26/03/2010 46 5 17 281
Puyo 3-7/05/2010 94 5 0 84
Vinces 19-23/07/2010 57 5 11 1,301
Manglaralto 20-24/09/2010 105 6 14 308
Puyo 18-22/10/2010 177 6 5 30
Puyo 14-18/2/2011 103 5 2 15
Vinces 21-25/3/2011 43 5 9 3,212
Manglaralto 16-20/5/2011 77 5 13 82
Puyo 22-26/8/2011 105 6 0 65
Manglaralto 26-30/9/2011 85 5 14 709
Vinces 21-25/11/2011 100 5 37 549
Total 1,842 100 186 73,505

* The samples were collected from the following sites: Vinces: Hospital Nicolás Cotto Infante, Subcentro de Salud San Lorenzo de Vinces, Isla de Bejucal, Subcentro de Salud Antonio Sotomayor, Abras de Mantequilla, El Recuerdo, Puerto Nuevo, Campo Alegre, Playones La Luz, Palenque, San Miguel de Palenque, Haciendas La María y El Rocío. Manglaralto: Hospital de Manglaralto, -Dos Mangas-, Santa María del Fiat, Haciendas San Francisco, El Edén y La Carmela, Fincas Lauricel Rodríguez, Manuel Baque y Benito Chiquito, - Olón-, Finca El Retiro, -La entrada-, Finca La Española: Puyo: Subcentro de Salud El Dorado, Fuerte Militar Amazonas-Brigada de Selva 17 Pastaza-Shell, Hospital Provincial de Puyo, Quesería 10 de Agosto, Recinto Fátima, Reserva de monos, Depósito de agua potable

Table S2 Number of febrile patients (n) per sampling location analyzed for IgM Abs against WNV and DENV and percentage of reactive samples 

Location n (female/ male) WNV IgM* % of positives (number of positives/n) DENV IgM % of positives (number of positives/n)
Vinces 69 (36/33) 1.66 (1/60) 0 (0/60)
Manglaralto 20 (16/4) 5.55 (1/18) 0 (0/18)
Puyo 13 (3/10) 0 (0/13) 30.76 (4/13)
Total 102 (55/47) 1.96 (2/102) 4.65 (4/86)

Table S3 Equines showing Abs to Alphavirus by HI test of N=149. EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus; WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus; VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. The reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination is shown for each virus. *= monotypic reactions, ** highest dilution showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination in heterotypic reactions 

Sample Code Date EEEV WEEV VEEV Location
EGV789 24/09/2009 40 0 40 Manglaralto
EGV791 24/09/2009 40 0 40 Manglaralto
EGV 2239 28/09/2011 40 0 40 Manglaralto
EGV 2240 28/09/2011 20 0 20 Manglaralto
EGV 2241 28/09/2011 20 20 40** Manglaralto
EGV1979 18/05/2011 0 20* 0 Manglaralto
EGV2010 19/05/2011 0 20* 0 Manglaralto
EGV2012 19/05/2011 0 20* 0 Manglaralto
EGV229 26/03/2009 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV1145 25/03/2010 0 0 40* Manglaralto
EGV 2262 29/09/2011 0 0 40* Manglaralto
EGV321 27/05/2009 40 80 80 Vinces
EGV322 27/05/2009 40* 0 0 Vinces
EGV323 27/05/2009 80 80 80 Vinces
EGV324 27/05/2009 40 80 80 Vinces
EGV328 27/05/2009 160 80 160 Vinces
EGV329 27/05/2009 160 1,280** 80 Vinces
EGV330 27/05/2009 40 80 80 Vinces
EGV331 27/05/2009 160 320** 40 Vinces
EGV332 27/05/2009 40 320** 40 Vinces
EGV333 27/05/2009 40 320** 0 Vinces
EGV334 27/05/2009 40 160** 40 Vinces
EGV1292 20/07/2010 40* 0 0 Vinces
EGV318 27/05/2009 0 40 40 Vinces
EGV326 27/05/2009 0 20 20 Vinces
EGV335 27/05/2009 0 80 160** Vinces
EGV1290 20/07/2010 0 0 2 0* Vinces
EGV1885 23/03/2011 0 0 20* Vinces
EGV1888 23/03/2011 0 0 40* Vinces
EGV1711 21/10/2010 0 0 40* Puyo

Table S4 Hamsters showing Abs against Alphavirus by HI test of N=84 after exposure in the field. EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus; WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus; VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. The reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination is shown for each virus. *= monotypic reactions, ** highest dilution showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination in heterotypic reactions 

Sample code Date EEEV WEEV VEEV Location
EGV1163 25/03/2010 20* 0 0 Manglaralto
EGV1165 25/03/2010 20* 0 0 Manglaralto
EGV1513 24/09/2010 20 0 20 Manglaralto
EGV1514 24/09/2010 80* 0 0 Manglaralto
EGV1515 24/09/2010 80* 0 0 Manglaralto
EGV1516 24/09/2010 40** 0 20 Manglaralto
EGV1517 24/09/2010 20 0 20 Manglaralto
EGV1518 24/09/2010 40* 0 0 Manglaralto
EGV2018 31/05/2011 40 40 20 Manglaralto
EGV 2271 30/09/2011 20 0 40** Manglaralto
EGV2019 31/05/2011 0 20 40** Manglaralto
EGV829 25/09/2009 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV830 25/09/2009 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV832 25/09/2009 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV1164 25/03/2010 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV2015 31/05/2011 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV2016 31/05/2011 0 0 40* Manglaralto
EGV2017 31/05/2011 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV 2273 30/09/2011 0 0 20* Manglaralto
EGV1075 05/02/2010 20* 0 0 Vinces
EGV1077 05/02/2010 20* 0 0 Vinces
EGV1373 23/07/2010 20* 0 0 Vinces
EGV1374 23/07/2010 20 0 20 Vinces
EGV1376 23/07/2010 40* 0 0 Vinces
EGV1918 25/03/2011 20* 0 0 Vinces
EGV1078 05/02/2010 0 0 40* Vinces
EGV1374 23/07/2010 20 0 20 Vinces
EGV1377 23/07/2010 0 0 20* Vinces
EGV657 11/09/2009 1,280** 0 20 Puyo
EGV1280 07/05/2010 20* 0 0 Puyo
EGV1283 07/05/2010 40* 0 0 Puyo
EGV1284 07/05/2010 40* 0 0 Puyo
EGV1717 22/10/2010 40** 0 20 Puyo
EGV1718 22/10/2010 80** 0 20 Puyo
EGV1719 22/10/2010 40* 0 0 Puyo
EGV1720 22/10/2010 20* 0 0 Puyo
EGV 2149 01/09/2011 20* 0 0 Puyo
EGV653 11/09/2009 0 0 20* Puyo
EGV655 11/09/2009 0 0 40* Puyo
EGV658 11/09/2009 0 0 20* Puyo
EGV1722 22/10/2010 0 0 20* Puyo
EGV1744 16/02/2011 0 0 80* Puyo
EGV1745 16/02/2011 0 0 40* Puyo
EGV1837 17/02/2011 0 0 20* Puyo

Table S5 Number of mosquitoes per genus and species captured in the locations studied 

Species Vinces Manglaralto Puyo Total
Trichoprosopon digitatum 0 0 7 7
Culex (Mel) spp. 62,732 293 32 63,057
Ochlerotatus serratus 2,325 507 27 2,859
Aedeomyia squamipennis 261 1 0 262
Psorophora (Jan) ferox 1 0 5 6
Mansonia pseudotitilians/indubitans 4,234 72 0 4,306
Coquillettidia venezuelensis 1,476 0 160 1,636
Aedes (Stg) aegypti 0 912 0 912
Anopheles (Nys) albimanus 32 1 4 37
Anopheles (Nys) triannulatus 319 14 1 334
Anopheles (Nys) pseudopunctipennis 0 85 0 85
Anopheles (Nys) nuneztovari 0 4 0 4
Total 71,380 1,889 236 73,505

Table S6 Spearman correlation of the number of mosquitoes captured by species and the proportion of human samples showing IgG Abs reactive against DENV, SLEV, WNV, YFV, EEV, WEEV, and VEEV 

Virus and statistics estimates Mosquitoes especies
Td C_sp O_s A_s Ps_sp M_sp Cq_v Ae_a An_a An_t An_pse An_nun
Spearman’s rho DENV Correlation coefficient -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1,000** 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.333
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Upper limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
SLEV Correlation coefficient -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1,000** 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.333
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Upper limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
WNV Correlation coefficient -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1,000** 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.333
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Upper limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
YFV Correlation coefficient 0.000 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -1,000** 0.866 -1,000** -0.500 0.866 0.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.667 0.333 0.333
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit 0.000 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -1.000 0.866 -1.000 -0.500 0.866 0.866
Upper limit 0.000 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -0.500 -1.000 0.866 -1.000 -0.500 0.866 0.866
EEEV Correlation coefficient -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1,000** 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.333
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Upper limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
WEEV Correlation coefficient -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1,000** 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.667 0.667 0.333 0.333
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
Upper limit -0.866 0.500 0.500 0.500 -1.000 0.500 -0.500 0.866 -0.500 0.500 0.866 0.866
VEEV Correlation coefficient -0.866 1,000** 1,000** 1,000** -0.500 1,000** 0.500 0.000 0.500 1,000** 0.000 0.000
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.667 1.000 0.667 1.000 1.000
N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Sampling simulation Bias Standard error 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Confidence interval 95% Lower limit -0.866 1.000 1.000 1.000 -0.500 1.000 0.500 0.000 0.500 1.000 0.000 0.000
Upper limit -0.866 1.000 1.000 1.000 -0.500 1.000 0.500 0.000 0.500 1.000 0.000 0.000

** Correlation is significant at 0,01 Sig. (2-tailed).

Simulation was based on 1,000 replicates.

Table S7 Mosquito species identified in this study and the arboviruses they harbor according to viral isolation studies elsewhere* 

Mosquitos species Arbovirus carried Reference
Trichoprosopon digitatum Pixuna virus and Wyeomyia virus. Bussuquara, SLEV and ILHV have been isolated from mixed pools that included this species. (1-2)
Culex (Mel) spp. WNV, VEEV, VESL, Japanese Encephalitis virus (3)
Ochlerotatus serratus OROV, YFV, ILHV (4-6)
Aedeomyia squamipennis Gamboa virus, VEEV (7,8)
Psorophora (Jan) ferox Rocio virus 9
Mansonia pseudotitilians/indubitans VEEV 10
Coquillettidia venezuelensis MAYV, OROV y SLEV, WNV (11-12)
Aedes (Stg) aegypti DENV, YFV, ZKV, CHKV 13
Anopheles (Nys) albimanus Not known
Anopheles (Nys) triannulatus Not known
Anopheles (Nys) pseudopunctipennis Not known
Anopheles (Nys) nuneztovari Not known
TOTAL Not known

*This is not an exhaustive list of arboviruses carried by mosquitoes

Received: July 02, 2020; Accepted: October 27, 2020

*Corresponding author: Leandro Patiño, Dirección Técnica de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez”, Julián Coronel 905 y Esmeraldas, Guayaquil, Ecuador Telefax: (593) 4 228 8097 lpatino@inspi.gob.ec

Author contributions:

Ernesto Gutiérrez: Study design, sampling, data analysis, and manuscript drafting Mary Regato: Study design, laboratory analysis, and manuscript corrections Víctor Mora and Julio Montesdeoca: Sampling and laboratory analysis Martha Castillo: Laboratory analysis, data analysis, and manuscript drafting Leandro Patiño participated in all the stages of the study.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License