SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 issue3Effect of a Specialized Nursing Subject Assignment on Perceived Knowledge and Skills to Care for Drug Users author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Investigación y Educación en Enfermería

Print version ISSN 0120-5307On-line version ISSN 2216-0280

Invest. educ. enferm vol.42 no.3 Medellín Sep./Dec. 2024  Epub Nov 02, 2024

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v42n3e16 

Original Article

Social determinants of health and exclusive breastfeeding: a longitudinal study

Determinantes sociales de la salud y lactancia materna exclusiva: un estudio longitudinal

Determinantes sociais da saúde e aleitamento materno exclusivo: um estudo longitudinal

Ananda Larisse Bezerra da Silva1  7  8  * 

Elizabete Regina Araújo Oliveira2  7 

Wanessa Lacerda Poton3  9 

Andreia Soprani dos Santos4  7 

Susana Bubach5  10 

Maria Helena Monteiro de Barros Miotto6  7 

1 PhD. Nurse. Email: anandalarisse@hotmail.com. Corresponding Author. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-1103

2 PhD. Associate Professor. Email: elizabete_regina@hotmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-4273

3 PhD. . Email: wanessa.poton@uvv.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-0653

4 PhD. Full Professor. Email: andreia.s.santos@ufes.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4377-6517

5 PhD. Full Professor. Email: susana.bubach@ufes.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7190-5275

6 PhD. Full Professor. Email: mhmiotto@terra.com.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3227-7608

7 Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil.

8 Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil.

9 Vila Velha University, Vila Velha, Espirito Santo, Brazil.

10 Federal University of Espirito Santo, São Mateus, Espirito Santo, Brazil.


Abstract

Objective.

To analyze the social determinants of health of exclusive breastfeeding on the 7th and 27th day after delivery.

Methods.

A longitudinal, multicenter study with a quantitative approach was conducted with postpartum women and newborns in three maternity hospitals in the state of Espírito Santo (Brazil). The sample consisted of 2,325 and 1,819 mother/baby pairs on the 7th and 27th day, respectively. The variables that most influence women in exclusive breastfeeding were assessed by logistic regression.

Results.

The rate of exclusive breastfeeding seven days after delivery was 80.7% and 79.2% on the 27th day. The social determinants of health up to the 27th day after delivery that were related to exclusive breastfeeding aimed at the mother were: mother's age up to 19 years (OR 1.9); and in newborns, the following stood out: full-term baby (OR 2.2) and no difficulty in EBF (OR=8.8).

Conclusion.

The relationship between social determinants of health such as maternal age, gestational age of the baby at birth and difficulties in breastfeeding influence the practice of EBF.

Descriptors: breastfeeding; social determinants of health; newborn.

Resumen

Objetivo.

Analizar los determinantes sociales de la lactancia materna exclusiva (LME) en los días 7 y 27 después del parto.

Métodos.

Estudio longitudinal, multicéntrico, con abordaje cuantitativo, realizado con puérperas y recién nacidos en tres maternidades del estado de Espírito Santo (Brasil). La muestra consistió en 2325 y 1819 binomios madre/bebé en el 7º y 27º día, respectivamente. Las variables que más influyeron en las mujeres en la LME fueron evaluadas por regresión logística.

Resultados.

La tasa de LME a los siete días del parto fue del 80.7% y del 79.2% al 27º día. El determinante social de la salud hasta el 27º día tras el parto que se relacionó con la LME para la madre fue la edad hasta 19 años (OR 1.9); y para el recién nacido: el haber nacido a término (OR 2.2) y no tener ninguna dificultad para amamantar (OR=8.8).

Conclusión.

La relación entre determinantes sociales de la salud como la edad materna, la edad gestacional del bebé al nacer y las dificultades para la lactancia materna influyen en la práctica de la LME.

Descriptores: lactancia materna; determinantes sociales de la salud; recién nacido.

Resumo

Objetivo.

Analisar os determinantes sociais de saúde do aleitamento materno exclusivo (AME) no 7º e no 27º dia após o parto.

Métodos.

Estudo longitudinal, multicêntrico, com abordagem quantitativa realizado com puérperas e recém-nascidos, em três maternidades do estado do Espírito Santo (Brasil). A amostra foi composta por 2325 e 1819 binômios mãe/bebê no 7º e no 27º dia, respectivamente. As variáveis que mais influenciam as mulheres na amamentação exclusiva foram avaliadas por regressão logística.

Resultados.

A taxa de aleitamento materno exclusivo sete dias após o parto foi de 80.7% e de 79.2% no 27º dia. Os determinantes sociais de saúde até o 27º dia após o parto que estiveram relacionados ao aleitamento materno exclusivo voltados para a mãe foram: idade da mãe até 19 anos (OR 1.9); e no recém-nascido destacaram-se: bebê nascido à termo (OR 2.2) e não ter dificuldade no AME (OR=8.8).

Conclusão.

A relação dos determinantes sociais de saúde como idade materna, idade gestacional do bebê ao nascer e dificuldades na amamentação influenciam na prática do AME.

Descritores: aleitamento materno; determinantes sociais de saúde; recém-nascido.

Introduction

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in the first 6 months of life is considered the most complete diet for newborns, as it provides all the energy, vitamins, and minerals that infants need. After this period, breastfeeding must continue until at least 2 years of age, even after the introduction of solid foods.1 This is because it is the most economical and effective form of protection against infant mortality, diarrheal diseases, respiratory infections, allergies, and other conditions, in addition to being a protective factor against maternal breast cancer and promoting better orofacial development in children.2,3 The National Study on Child Feeding and Nutrition (ENANI) carried out in 2019 showed that, despite Brazil's progress in breastfeeding, less than half of children aged 0 to 6 months were being exclusively breastfed (45.7%)4. This data contradicts the global target presented in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals, which proposes to reach at least 50% of EBF in the first 6 months of life by 2025 and 70% by 2030.5 In addition, the prevalence of continued breastfeeding in the first year of life (among children aged 12 to 23 months) in the country was 43.6%, with the median duration of EBF being three months, according to ENANI-2019.4

There are several factors related to the choice of not breastfeeding or stopping breastfeeding early. Studies suggest that conditions such as previous obesity or overweight, low education level, cesarean section, perception of insufficient breast milk, maternal illness, refusal to breastfeed, return to work or school, infant illness and cultural factors directly influence this decision.6-8 In addition to the primary role of health care provided to mothers, from prenatal care, delivery, puerperium until the first months of the baby's life, where nursing plays a leading role in care, mainly through education and health promotion in primary health care.9 In view of this, it is important to be aware of the social factors that determine the health of infants and mothers. Thus, theorists such as Dahlgren and Whitehead10 describe the social determinants of health as factors related to the population's living and working conditions that influence its health status. The model described by them is widely used, precisely because it addresses the relationships between social factors and individual and collective health.10 In addition to this broader understanding of the social determinants of health, in an attempt to understand more deeply the factors that affect breastfeeding, the Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group, based on a systematic review, proposed a conceptual model to identify the components of an environment conducive to breastfeeding, classifying the determinants into three categories: 1) structural; 2) environmental; and 3) individual. This framework provides a theoretical basis for exploring the specific determinants of breastfeeding in different sociocultural contexts.3,8 Despite the large number of studies on the SDH (Social Determinants of Health) of EBF, few address EBF adherence on the 7th and 27th days after birth, which justifies the question of this research: what are the social determinants of health of exclusive breastfeeding on the 7th and 27th days after birth? Therefore, it is essential to understand the barriers that EBF faces and to identify the nuances of this process, so that it is possible to outline actions directed to the needs of each population. Thus, this study aims to analyze the social determinants of health of exclusive breastfeeding on the 7th and 27th day after delivery.

Methods

Type of study, population, and sample. This is a longitudinal, multicenter study with a quantitative approach that used data from the Viver Project.10 This study was conducted with postpartum women and newborns in two maternity hospitals in the metropolitan region and in one maternity hospital in the northern region of the state of Espírito Santo, in the southeast of Brazil. The maternity hospitals that participated in the study were selected based on the following aspects: a) those that performed the most deliveries in the region; b) being located in one of the two health regions; c) having a diversity of care, with 80% to 100% coverage by the Unified Health System and 100% private or covered by supplementary health insurance. The population of the Viver Project corresponds to all mothers and children born alive or who died in the perinatal period. They were invited to participate in the study from August 2019 to January 2020, resulting in an initial population of 5,369 mother/baby binomials. The study sample was a census sample, as it included the entire population of mothers of children born in the three maternity hospitals that met the selection criteria, covering the entire universe investigated during the study period.

Techniques and Procedures. To conduct this study, the sample investigated was composed of two moments: 7th and 27th days after delivery, including two samples of mother/baby dyads, with 2,325 and 1,819, respectively. With a percentage of losses and refusals of 21.7% (n = 506) between the two periods. To capture the study sample, an interview was initially conducted in the maternity hospital, before hospital discharge. From that moment in question, for this study, sociodemographic and prenatal-related variables were used. The independent variables investigated in the study were: maternal characteristics, at both time points, consisting of age group, marital status, race, maternal years of schooling, maternal employment, family income, socioeconomic status according to the Brazilian Association of Research Companies, which uses the purchasing power of families as a classification criterion, from highest (A) to lowest (E), number of people living in the same household, use of alcohol and/or tobacco and use of illicit drugs. Variables related to breastfeeding: feeding and deleterious oral habits investigated on the 7th and 27th days of the babies' lives. Data collection was performed by telephone survey, using a previously prepared research instrument, on the 7th and 27th days of the child's life. However, in order to minimize segment losses, a characteristic of this type of study, the first monitoring was carried out between the 7th and 10th day after birth and the second between the 27th and 30th day, by a team trained for this purpose.

Data analysis. A descriptive analysis of the data was carried out using frequency tables with numbers and percentages. The variables that most influence women in exclusive breastfeeding were assessed by logistic regression. The significance level adopted was 5%. The statistical package IBM SPSS 20 - was used for this analysis.

Ethical aspects. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Vila Velha (CAAE 02503018.0.0000.5064). The Informed Consent Form was signed by the mother or guardian of the child, while still in the maternity ward, and they were instructed that they would be contacted by telephone to continue the research.

Results

In total, 2,325 and 1,819 postpartum women were interviewed on the 7th and 27th days, respectively. The predominant age range was between 20 and 34 years, at both times, 69.5% and 68.7%. Of these, the majority lived with a partner, 82.4% and 82.7%, respectively and 48.7% declared themselves to be brown. Regarding years of study, 55.7% and 58.1% studied for 12 years or more, and 53.8% and 56.3% had a job. The predominant family income was up to two minimum wages, representing 45.8% and 44% of the times investigated. It was found that 39% and 40.2% of the study samples belonged to socioeconomic class B and lived with four to six people in the same household, corresponding to 51.9% and 51.7%. There is no statistical significance between the two moments, that is, the samples from the two periods investigated are equivalent (Table 1).

Table 1 Maternal data on the 7th and 27th days of the newborn's life 

Characteristic 7th day (n=2325) 27th day (n=1819) p-value
n % n %
Age group
Up to 19 years 270 11.6 204 11.2 0.571
20 - 34 years 1617 69.5 1249 68.7
35 years or older 438 18.8 366 20.1
Marital status
Lives with partner 1916 82.4 1504 82.7 0.973
Does not live with partner 268 11.5 206 11.3
Not declared 141 6.1 109 6.0
Race
White 648 27.9 503 27.7 0.888
Mixed 1133 48.7 886 48.7
Black 433 18.6 342 18.8
Yellow 16 0.7 14 0.8
Indigenous 2 0.1 0 0.0
Not declared 93 4.0 74 4.1
Years of education
Up to 4 years 19 0.8 14 0.8 0.567
5 - 8 years 224 9.6 158 8.7
9 - 11 years 507 21.8 388 21.3
12 years or more 1295 55.7 1057 58.1
Not declared 280 12.0 202 11.1
Works
Yes 1250 53.8 1025 56.3 0.248
No 1059 45.5 783 43.0
Not declared 16 0.7 11 0.6
Family income in minimum wages
Up to 1 485 20.9 357 19.6 0.853
Between 1 and 2 580 24.9 444 24.4
Between 2 - 3 401 17.2 326 17.9
Between 3 - 4 172 7.4 139 7.6
Between 4 - 5 205 8.8 177 9.7
More than 5 259 11.1 211 11.6
Not declared 223 9.6 165 9.1
Socioeconomic status
A 381 16.4 317 17.4 0.156
B 907 39.0 732 40.2
C 893 38.4 683 37.5
D 118 5.1 72 4.0
E 5 0.2 0 0.0
Not declared 21 0.9 15 0.8
People living in the household
0 - 3 984 42.3 779 42.8 0.968
4 - 6 1206 51.9 940 51.7
7 or more 84 3.6 63 3.5
Not declared 51 2.2 37 2.0
Total 2325 100.0 1819 100.0

Of the 80.7%, 79.2% remained on EBF on the 7th day and 27th day on 79.2%. 19.3% on the 7th day, and 20.8% received complementary feeding on the 27th day. Of these, 86% on the 7th day and 83.4% on the 27th day were fed with human milk and industrialized formula (Table 2). Regarding difficulty in breastfeeding, 89.1% and 78.2% did not present this difficulty on the 7th and 27th days (Table 2). The data focused on deleterious oral habits investigated on the 7th and 27th days after birth showed that 79.6% and 73.8%, respectively, did not perform finger sucking. On the 7th day, 66.9% did not use a pacifier, a practice that decreased to 57.4% on the 27th day. The non-use of a bottle was characterized by 91% on the 7th day and 76.1% on the 27th day (Table 2).

Table 2 Data on breastfeeding, feeding and harmful oral habits of babies on the 7th and 27th days after delivery 

Characteristic 7 days after delivery 27 days after delivery p-value
n % n %
Exclusive breastfeeding
Yes 1876 80.7 1441 79.2 <0.0001
No 449 19.3 378 20.8
Not declared 1113 - 1619 -
Complementary feeding
Industrialized formula 32 14.0 61 16.6 <0.0001
Human milk + formula 197 86.0 307 83.4
Human milk 0 0.0 0 0.0
Not declared 220 - 10 -
Difficulty breastfeeding
Yes 505 21.8 195 10.9 <0.0001
No 1815 78.2 1593 89.1
Not declared 1118 - 1650 -
Digital sucking
Yes 478 20.4 478 26.2 <0.0001
No 1860 79.6 1347 73.8
Not declared 1100 - 1613 -
Baby uses a pacifier
Yes 774 33.1 775 42.6 <0.0001
No 1561 66.9 1046 57.4
Not declared 1103 - 1617 -
Use of bottle
Yes 209 9.0 434 23.9 <0.0001
No 2122 91.0 1379 76.1
Not declared 1107 - 1625 -

Regarding EBF on the 7th day and the determinants related to mothers, Table 3 shows a relationship with marital status. Mothers with a partner were more likely to maintain EBF (adjusted OR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.28-2.72) than those without a partner. In addition, the relationship between EBF and alcohol and/or tobacco consumption and not using illicit drugs was also significant. It was revealed that women who consumed alcohol and/or tobacco and who did not use illicit drugs had 1.82 and 2.99 chances of practicing EBF, respectively (adjusted OR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.15 - 2.87; adjusted OR = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.24 - 7.17).

Table 3 Maternal data and the relationship between exclusive breastfeeding seven days after delivery 

Characteristic Without EBF With EBF Sig. OR Adjusted OR
n % n %
Age group
Up to 19 years 47 17.4 223 82.6 0.138 1.154 1.441 (0.890 - 2.335)
20 years or more 402 19.6 1653 80.4
Marital status
With partner 359 18.7 1557 81.3 0.001 1.563 1.869 (1.280 - 2.728)
Without partner 71 26.5 197 73.5
Race
White 129 19.9 519 80.1 0.783 1.078 1.043 (0.775 - 1.403)
Non-white 297 18.8 1287 81.3
Years of education
Up to 11 years 138 18.4 612 81.6 0.685 1.066 1.065 (0.786 - 1.443)
12 years or more 251 19.4 1044 80.6
Works
Yes 242 19.4 1008 80.6 0.620 1.006 1.078 (0.801 - 1.451)
No 204 19.3 855 80.7
Family income
Up to 2 MW 213 20.0 852 80.0 0.142 1.100 1.288 0.919 - 1.805
Over 2 MW 192 18.5 845 81.5
Socioeconomic status
AB 254 19.7 1034 80.3 0.983 1.047 1.004 (0.727 - 1.384)
CDE 193 19.0 823 81.0
Use of alcohol and/or tobacco
Yes 53 17.2 255 82.8 0.010 1.175 1.820 (1.153 - 2.874)
No 396 19.6 1621 80.4
Use of illicit drugs
No 411 18.7 1784 81.3 0.014 2.026 2.993 (1.249 - 7.172)
Yes 14 31.8 30 68.2

EBF = Exclusive breastfeeding; OR = Odds Ratio; MW = Minimum wage.

The logistic regression between exclusive breastfeeding on the 7th day and data related to the newborn and care provided during the prenatal period showed that children born with normal weight had 2.52 (adjusted OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.48-4.31) chances of practicing EBF than those born with low weight, and mothers who did not have difficulties breastfeeding had 2.701 chances of maintaining EBF than those who had this difficulty (adjusted OR = 2.70; 95% CI = 2.07-3.56) (Table 4).

Table 4 Relationship between exclusive breastfeeding seven days after delivery and data related to the newborn and prenatal care 

Characteristic Without EBF With EBF Sig. OR Adjusted OR
n % n %
Sex NB
Female 220 20.1 877 79.9 0.390 1.094 1.116 (0.869 - 1.432)
Male 229 18.6 999 81.4
Newborn weight
Normal weight 409 18.4 1812 81.6 0.001 2.769 2.526 (1.480 - 4.313)
Low weight 40 38.5 64 61.5
Gestational age
Preterm 33 32.7 68 67.3 0.280 2.110 1.378 (0.770 - 2.466)
Full term 408 18.7 1775 81.3
Primiparous
Yes 170 21.1 635 78.9 0.517 1.252 2.030 (0.238 - 17.27)
No 211 17.6 987 82.4
Educational activity
Yes 100 17.8 461 82.2 0.124 1.139 1.267 (0.937 - 1.714)
No 343 19.8 1388 80.2
Guidance on EBF
Yes 395 19.1 1671 80.9 0.268 1.069 1.250 (0.842 - 1.856)
No 45 20.1 179 79.9
Previous EBF experience
Yes 176 16.7 879 83.3 0.620 1.330 1.718 (0.202 - 14.62)
No 171 21.0 642 79.0
Difficulty in EBF
No 258 14.3 1541 85.7 <0.001 3.086 2.701 (2.079 - 3.561)
Yes 169 34.1 327 65.9

NB = Newborn; EBF = Exclusive breastfeeding; OR = Odds ratio.

The age group of the mothers analyzed on the 27th day after delivery was shown to be a relevant determinant regarding EBF; mothers up to 19 years old were 1.934 times more likely to practice EBF than those aged 20 or older (adjusted OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.07-3.49) (Table 5).

Table 5 Relationship between exclusive breastfeeding twenty-seven days after delivery and data related to the mothers participating in the study 

Characteristic Without EBF With EBF Sig. OR Adjusted OR
N% % N %
Age group
Up to 19 years 34 16.7 170 83.3 0.029 1.353 1.934 (1.070 - 3.495)
20 years or more 344 21.3 1271 78.7
Marital status
With partner 313 20.8 1191 79.2 0.404 1.064 1.209 (0.775 - 1.886)
Without partner 45 21.8 161 78.2
Race
White 121 24.1 382 75.9 0.259 1.330 1.196 (0.876 - 1.633)
Non-white 239 19.2 1003 80.8
Years of education
Up to 11 years 118 21.1 442 78.9 0.459 1.002 1.133 (0.814 - 1.578)
12 years or more 223 21.1 834 78.9
Works
Yes 209 20.4 816 79.6 0.246 1.058 1.211 (0.876 - 1.674)
No 167 21.3 616 78.7
Family income
Up to 2 MW 145 18.1 656 81.9 0.625 1.305 1.097 (0.757 - 1.588)
Over 2 MW 191 22.4 662 77.6
Socioeconomic status
AB 237 22.6 812 77.4 0.269 1.305 1.222 (0.856 - 1.746)
CDE 138 18.3 617 81.7
Use of alcohol and/or tobacco
Yes 49 20.3 192 79.4 0.231 1.032 1.337 (0.831 - 2.149)
No 329 20.8 1249 79.2
Use of illicit drugs
Yes 8 22.2 28 77.8 0.777 1.095 1.179 (0.378 - 3.672)
No 355 20.7 1360 79.3

EBF = Exclusive breastfeeding; OR = Odds ratio; MW = Minimum wage.

Newborns born at term were 2.28 times more likely to practice EBF than those born prematurely (adjusted OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.18-4.40). And mothers who reported no difficulty breastfeeding were 8.827 times more likely to maintain EBF on the 27th day after delivery than those who reported this difficulty (adjusted OR = 8.82; 95% CI = 5.98-13.02) (Table 6).

Table 6 Relationship between exclusive breastfeeding twenty-seven days after delivery and data related to the newborn and prenatal care 

Characteristic Without EBF With EBF Sig. OR Adjusted OR
N % N %
Sex of newborn
Female 178 21.2 663 78.8 0.819 1.044 1.035 (0.769 - 1.394)
Male 200 20.4 778 79.6
Weight of newborn
Low weight 28 31.5 61 68.5 0.545 1.810 1.224 (0.636 - 2.357)
Normal weight 350 20.2 1380 79.8
Gestational age
Premature 22 28.9 54 71.1 0.014 1.572 2.284 (1.184 - 4.404)
Full term 352 20.6 1359 79.4
Primiparous
Yes 123 19.4 510 80.6 0.669 1.062 1.670 (0.159 - 17.49)
No 189 20.4 738 79.6
Educational activity
Yes 93 20.9 352 79.1 0.599 1.009 1.097 (0.777 - 1.549)
No 280 20.8 1069 79.2
Guidance on EBF
Yes 352 21.6 1281 78.4 0.081 1.647 1.679 (0.939 - 3.003)
No 23 14.3 138 85.7
Previous EBF experience
Yes 145 17.9 666 82.1 0.588 1.106 1.913 (0.183 - 19.99)
No 124 19.4 515 80.6
Difficulty with EBF
Yes 114 58.8 80 41.2 <0.001 8.475 8.827 (5.983 - 13.02)
No 228 14.4 1359 85.6

NB = Newborn; EBF = Exclusive breastfeeding; OR = Odds ratio.

Discussion

There are many determinants that affect exclusive breastfeeding, influencing the decision-making of nursing mothers about whether or not to continue with this practice. The EBF rate (80.7% and 79.2%) at both times analyzed, 7th and 27th day after delivery, was satisfactory. The different pro-breastfeeding approaches that are carried out during prenatal care may have contributed to achieving these results. A study showed that 87% of mothers had six or more prenatal consultations, and a scoping review that analyzed the health determinants of EBF reinforced that prenatal care and the number of consultations carried out during this period are determinants for the success of EBF,12,13 ​​in addition to the lack of difficulty in breastfeeding (78.2% and 89.1%), present in the periods investigated. This determinant is addressed both during prenatal care and, more intensively, during the postpartum period, mainly through nursing care, in which breasts are assessed and guidance is provided regarding possible changes that may occur at the beginning of breastfeeding and how to deal with them. It is known that no anatomical type of nipple can prevent breastfeeding, although its malformation may make it difficult for the baby to latch on correctly. This difficulty can be overcome through scientific and technical knowledge on the part of the health team, as well as knowledge regarding the lactation process.14

The marital status of the women studied was a determining factor in EBF on the 7th day after delivery. Those who had a partner were more likely to maintain EBF on the 7th day after delivery than those without this support network. This finding corroborates that found in other studies. In Nigeria, when investigating the importance of a support network for exclusive breastfeeding in the first months of an infant's life, it was shown that support from a partner is crucial for the continuation of this practice.15 This was also significant in a study conducted in China (OR = 1.91) when the father and close friends provided support in the first month after birth8. This finding reinforces that the presence of a husband/partner as support for the mother and newborn contributes to the practice and maintenance of exclusive breastfeeding.

The relationship between alcohol and/or tobacco use and EBF on the 7th day after delivery appeared to be a determinant in this period. As well as not using illicit drugs. It is confirmed that in the second moment, that is, in the perinatal period, the determinant of alcohol and/or tobacco use was not relevant for the analysis. In this context, a study that investigated the outcome of breastfeeding in drug-using mothers on the 7th, 15th, and 30th day after delivery identified a mean EBF of 28.8 days, and mothers who used legal or illegal drugs and continued to be monitored after delivery maintained EBF.16 The Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations (Febrasgo) and the Ministry of Health contraindicate breastfeeding when the mother is using illegal drugs such as cocaine, heroin, and marijuana, as these and other drugs can pass through the mother's milk and harm the baby, in addition to altering the mother's cognitive behavior, posing a risk to the necessary care for their children.17,18 The consumption of legal and illegal substances during breastfeeding should be addressed in the context of prenatal and postpartum care, emphasizing the harm this practice causes to the mother/baby binomial. New studies are suggested that can analyze this relationship, alcohol and breastfeeding in more depth in order to explain such causality.

Low birth weight and nipple problems were negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding in a multicenter study conducted in China.6 In the study in question, children born with normal weight were more likely to maintain EBF on the 7th day after delivery. Therefore, normal birth weight is a positive determinant of EBF, since the opposite, low birth weight, can lead to the early introduction of infant formulas, without acceptable clinical justification. In these cases, it is extremely important to evaluate other conditions, such as correct nipple latch when the baby is breastfeeding, and clinical evaluation of the mother's breasts, among others.19 Studies have identified that previous successful breastfeeding and knowledge about its benefits are factors that are associated with EBF, unlike the findings of this study, which did not find a relationship between previous experience and EBF.8,20 However, women who did not have difficulty breastfeeding until the 7th day after delivery were more likely to maintain EBF.

Regarding EBF on the 27th day after delivery, maternal age up to 19 years was a significant determinant. A recent study in India, however, showed that maternal age was negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding.16 A negative association between maternal age and EBF was also found in another study.6 Thus, regarding maternal age, the data are in line with the literature, which highlights that adolescent mothers are more likely to wean early. However, the data found raise important points that may justify this finding, such as the role of an effective support network, from the hospital, family, community and, mainly, primary health care, which welcomes and provides specialized assistance to these adolescent mothers.20

In addition to these factors, gestational age was shown to be crucial for the success of breastfeeding, since children who were born at term were more likely to maintain EBF when compared to those born prematurely (OR = 1.572). This finding is supported by other studies.21 The determinant of not having difficulty breastfeeding was a protective factor at both times investigated. This determinant investigated nipple fissures, adequate breastfeeding technique, correct position and latch, among other problems identified by the mothers. Therefore, it is concluded that the mothers were successful in the care provided both during pregnancy and during the postpartum period. Studies have shown that counseling and guidance on breastfeeding are a strong strategy for promoting, protecting, and supporting breastfeeding.9 In addition to the role of nursing in this care, being the main professional category that offers support and assistance to mothers at this time.9

Among the limitations of the study, we highlight the number of mothers who continued to respond to the telephone survey on the 27th day after delivery, even with all the strategies to reach these participants, which reduced the sample for the targeted monitoring and the lack of monitoring of the sample investigated until the sixth month of life of the babies, the period suggested for EBF. This was not possible due to problems in contacting the participants of the study, which took place during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion. The relationship between social determinants of health, such as marital status, maternal lifestyle habits, birth weight of the baby, and difficulties in breastfeeding, influences the practice of EBF. Understanding and comprehending the social determinants of health can favor greater adherence to EBF, in addition to contributing to greater knowledge and improvement of nursing practice in the context of breastfeeding.

References

1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Estratégia Nacional para Promoção do Aleitamento Materno e Alimentação Complementar Saudável no Sistema Único de Saúde: Manual de implementação. Guia alimentar para crianças brasileiras menores de 2 anos. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019. [ Links ]

2. Nascimento MBR. Os Reflexos da amamentação na vida adulta. In: Sociedade Brasileira De Pediatria. Guia prático de aleitamento materno. Rio de Janeiro: SBP, 2020. p. 5-8. Available from: https://www.sbp.com.br/fileadmin/user_upload/22800f-GUIAPRATICO-GuiaPratico_de_AM.pdf [ Links ]

3. Rollins NC, Lutter CK, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Martines JC et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2016; 25(1):20. [ Links ]

4. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ. Aleitamento materno: Prevalência e práticas de aleitamento materno em crianças brasileiras menores de 2 anos 4 - ENANI 2019. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ; 2021. 108 p. [ Links ]

5. Silva, ERA. Agenda 2030: ODS - Metas nacionais dos objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável. Brasília: Ipea, 2018. 502 p. [ Links ]

6. Fang Z, Liu Y, Wang H, Tang K. The Patterns and Social Determinants of Breastfeeding in 12 Selected Regions in China: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Human Lactation. 2020; 36(3):436-47. [ Links ]

7. Nkoka O, Ntenda PAM, Kanje V, Milanzi EB, Arora A. Determinants of timely initiation of breastmilk and exclusive breastfeeding in Malawi: a population - based cross-sectional study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2019; 14:37. [ Links ]

8. Shi H, Yang Y, Yin X, Li J, Fang J, Wang X. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months in China: a cross-sectional study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2021; 16(1):40. [ Links ]

9. Lustosa E, Lima RN. Importância da enfermagem frente à assistência primária ao aleitamento materno exclusivo na atenção básica. Revista Brasileira Interdisciplinar de Saúde. 2020; 2(2):93-7. [ Links ]

10. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Arbetsrapport, 14. Stockholm: Institutet för Framtidsstudier; 2007. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6472456.pdf [ Links ]

11. Poton W, Dos Santos A, Bubach S, Cypreste A, De Souza C, et al. Aspectos metodológicos do Projeto Viver: um estudo longitudinal no Espirito Santo (Brasil). Cadernos de Saúde Coletiva. No prelo; 2022. [ Links ]

12. Silva ALBD, Oliveira ERA, Poton WL, Santos ASD, Bubach S, Miotto MHMDB. Determinantes Maternos E De Recém-Nascidos Associados Ao Aleitamento Materno Exclusivo Em Maternidades Do Espirito Santo: Aleitamento Exclusivo No Espirito Santo. Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme. 2023; 97(3):e023160. [ Links ]

13. Silva ALB da, Ferreira CRS, Santos PG dos, Oliveira ERA, Miotto MHM de B. Health determinants associated with exclusive breastfeeding: a scoping review. Revista CEFAC. 2023; 25(5):e6822. [ Links ]

14. Joseph FI, Earland J. A qualitative exploration of the sociocultural determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practices among rural mothers, North West Nigeria. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2019; 14(1):38. [ Links ]

15. Ribeiro SDFT, Fernandes RAQ. Nutrizes usuárias de drogas e o desfecho da amamentação: estudo de coorte. SMAD, Revista Eletrônica Saúde Mental Álcool e Drogas. 2021; 17(1):32-38 [ Links ]

16. Federação Brasileira Das Associações De Ginecologia E Obstetrícia - FEBRASGO. Inibição da lactação: quando e como fazê-la? 2018 [ Links ]

17. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Saúde da criança: aleitamento materno e alimentação complementar. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde , 2015. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_crianca_aleitamento_materno_cab23.pdf [ Links ]

18. Lopes TSP, Lima CCB, Lima M de DM, Lima ISDB, Costa RMM, Lopes LDP, et al. Assessment of breastfeeding in term and preterm babies after hospital discharge: application of an observation form. Research, Society and Development. 2022; 11(3):e56511326893 [ Links ]

19. Kummer L, Duke N, Davis L, Borowsky I. Association of Social and Community Factors with U.S. Breastfeeding Outcomes. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2020; 15(10):646-54. [ Links ]

20. Buckland C, Hector D, Kolt GS, Fahey P, Arora A. Interventions to promote exclusive breastfeeding among young mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intrnational Breastfeeding Journal; 2020, 15:102. [ Links ]

21. Darboe ML, Jeyakumar A, Mansour SMA, Valawalkar S. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in The Gambia: a population-based study using the 2019-2020 demographic and health survey data. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2023; 18(1):33. [ Links ]

Source of Funding. To the Espírito Santo Research and Innovation Support Foundation for funding DECIT/SCTIE/MS/SESA-PPSUS and CNPq/FAPES, Notice number 25/2018, code EFP-00018377.

Received: May 08, 2024; Accepted: September 04, 2024

* Email: anandalarisse@hotmail.com. Corresponding Author

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License