SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número84Approaching the concepts of ecosystems resilience and stability through spatiotemporal system dynamics and agent-based modelling índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia

versão impressa ISSN 0120-6230

Rev.fac.ing.univ. Antioquia  no.84 Medellín jul./set. 2017

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n84a11 

Articles

Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane with cobalt, tungsten and molybdenum based materials*

Deshidrogenación oxidativa de propano con materiales a base de cobalto, tungsteno y molibdeno

Maurin Salamanca-Guzmán2 

Yordy Enrique Licea-Fonseca3 

Adriana Echavarría-Isaza1 

Arnaldo Faro4 

Luz Amparo Palacio-Santos5 

1Grupo Catalizadores y Adsorbentes, Instituto de Química, Universidad de Antioquia. Calle 67 # 53-108. A. A. 1226. Medellín, Colombia.

2 Department of Chemistry, Bielefeld University. Universitätsstraße 25, D-33501. Bielefeld, Germany.

3CENANO-DCAP, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia. Av. Venezuela 82. CEP 20081-312. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

4Departamento de Físico-Química, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Av. Athos da Silveira Ramos, 149. CEP 21941-909. Río de Janeiro, Brasil.

5Departamento de Operações e Processos Industriais, Instituto de Química, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524. CEP 20550-900. Río de Janeiro, Brasil.


ABSTRACT

Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane is a reliable alternative for olefins production. This paper presents the results obtained on oxidative dehydrogenation of propane by using two materials based on cobalt, tungsten, and molybdenum. The materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), temperature programmed reduction (TPR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermal analysis (DTA). The CoMo(y material was calcined at 623 K, transforming itself to β-CoMoO4 phase (CoMo(623), the same phase is observed when the material is calcined at 873 K (CoMo(y873). CoMo(y623 showed the best performance in oxidative dehydrogenation of propane, a yield to propene of 3.4% was obtained at 623 K using a space velocity of 100 mLg-1min-1. CoWs(y was calcined at 673 K, a low crystallinity wolframite was obtained. This material has a high selectivity to propene and low yield. CoMo(y873 has a selectivity and conversion within the range of the results reported in the literature. This is a prospective catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane; it was stable for 24 h of continuous operation at 773 K.

Keywords: Oxidative dehydrogenation; propane; cobalt; tungsten; molybdenum

RESUMEN

La deshidrogenación oxidativa de propano es una alternativa interesante para la obtención de olefinas. En este trabajo se presentan los resultados obtenidos en la deshidrogenación oxidativa de propano utilizando dos materiales a partir de cobalto, tungsteno y molibdeno. Los materiales fueron caracterizados utilizando Difracción de Rayos X (XRD), espectroscopia infrarroja con transformada de Fourier (FTIR), análisis termogravimétrico (TGA) y análisis térmico diferencial (DTA). El material CoMo(y al ser calcinado a 623 K se transforma en la fase β-CoMoO4 (CoMo(y623), la misma fase es obtenida cuando el material se calcina a 873 K (CoMo(y873). CoMo(y623 muestra un buen desempeño en la deshidrogenación oxidativa de propano, se obtuvo un rendimiento a propeno de 3,4% a una temperatura de 623 K y una velocidad espacial de 100 mL g-1 min-1. El material CoWs(y fue calcinado a 673 K, obteniéndose una fase wolframita de baja cristalinidad. Este material presenta una alta selectividad a propeno y un bajo rendimiento. CoMo(y873 presenta una buena actividad y selectividad, comparable con otros materiales reportados en la literatura, y su potencial como catalizador en la deshidrogenación oxidativa de propano se hace más evidente con la prueba que muestra ser estable durante 24 h de operación continua a 773 K.

Palabras clave: Deshidrogenación oxidativa; propano; cobalto; tungsteno; molibdeno

1. Introduction

Alkenes or olefins are traditionally obtained in oil refineries, either from natural gas through extraction processes, or by fluidized bed naphtha catalytic steam cracking. However, due to the constant growth in consumption of olefins and derivatives in the world market, these methods are insufficient. Thus, different synthesis paths to light olefins (C2-C4) production have been studied [1]. The dehydrogenation process offers the possibility to obtain olefins, and it requires high temperatures (>873 K). This condition can generate problems due to thermal cracking side reactions and fast and continuous coke formation; it can imply a total loss of the catalytic activity due to irreversible deactivation or a regeneration step of the catalyst [2].

To overcome the disadvantages of the alkane dehydrogenation process, several alternatives have been proposed, such as the development of catalysts with a higher selectivity and resistance to deactivation or coupling the dehydrogenation reaction (endothermal) with methane oxidation (highly exothermal), to provide the heat required for the dehydrogenation and shift the balance towards alkenes [3]. Nevertheless, the alternative that has aroused more interest is the oxidative dehydrogenation, using oxygen in the reaction mixture to generate olefins, without side or consecutive reactions. In the oxidative dehydrogenation, thermodynamic limitations are overcome, allowing milder operating conditions and avoiding the need for continuous catalyst regeneration. However, the main difficulty is to avoid the consecutive total oxidation to carbon oxides from the light alkane, implying the need for the development of materials with high selectivity [4].

Transition metal oxides are recognized as the best catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation. Molybdenum, vanadium and cobalt oxides show catalytic activity from 473 K [5]. Vanadium pentoxide is the most studied system. It does not present catalytic activity as a bulk material; the selectivity to propene obtained with supported V2O5 systems is between 60 and 80% and conversions about 1-15% [6-9]. The performance of niobium compounds is similar to that observed with vanadium compounds [10, 11].

Molybdenum compounds have shown low catalytic activity; nevertheless, different molybdates, such as NiMoO4, have higher conversions than those obtained with vanadium-based materials, with a lower selectivity [12-14]. Additionally, transition metal mixed oxides of Mo, V, Fe, Co, Ce, Mn, Te have been studied before, and they have shown a good catalytic activity in oxidative dehydrogenation [15-17].

Tungsten-based materials have not been extensively studied in this particular reaction. Mo-W and V-W mixed oxides supported on alumina or silica have been studied providing good selectivity results but not good conversion [18, 19]. Different catalytic systems for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane based on Co and Ni molybdates or tungstates have been tested; these systems showed a good selectivity and a promising propene yield [20, 21].

In this work, bulk materials in Co-Mo and Co-W systems have been synthesized, which are promising as catalytic precursors in oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. The conditions for a good catalytic performance were found, taking into account parameters such as selectivity, conversion, and stability.

2. Experimental

2.1Catalysts preparation

Bimetallic precursors were prepared using a co-precipitation method and were denominated CoMoϕy and CoWsϕy. The synthesis was carried out by preparing solutions of the metal salts, which were mixed and homogenized during the required time to form the gel. The salts used were Co(NO3)2*6H2O (Merk), (NH4)6Mo7O24*4H2O (Merk) and WO3 (Aldrich); tungsten oxide was dissolved with NH4OH, the NH4OH was also used as the precipitating agent. Next, the precipitating agent was added to the mixture, which was allowed to crystallize for 4 h at 353 K. In the end, the solids were recovered by filtration. Table 1 shows the molar gel composition of the precursor materials. The precursors were dried in a convection oven at 373 K. The final catalyst was obtained from calcination of the precursors at the temperatures that were chosen based on the thermal behavior shown below. Calcination temperature was defined at 673 K for CoWsϕy and at 623 K for CoMoϕy.

Table 1 Molar gel composition for the synthesized precursors 

Hereafter, the precursors or fresh materials are denominated CoMoϕy and CoWsϕy. The catalysts were denominated with the name of the precursor plus the calcination temperature: CoMoϕy623 and CoWsϕy673.

2.2. Materials characterization

X-Ray diffraction was carried out in a Miniflex model Rigaku equipment with Cu source (λ= 1,5418 Å) operated at 40 kV and 30 mA for values between 5 and 40° and with scanning rate 2° min-1. The thermal stability of the materials was studied by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermal analysis (DTA). TGA was carried out in TA Instruments Hi-Res TGA 2920 in a temperature range between 303 K and 1073 K, at a 10 K min-1 heating rate, under inert atmosphere (N2) and DTA was carried-out on a TA Instruments DSC 2920 model using the same conditions as in TGA. Additionally, fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained with a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One equipment. The samples were prepared as wafers containing ~1 wt% sample in KBr. Moreover, the temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) analyses was performed in a Zeton Altamira AMI-70; in this case, the pre-treatment was carried-out by heating the sample (50mg) from room temperature to 573 K under argon atmosphere, and the catalyst reduction took place under a 30 mL min-1 flow of H2 (10 vol %)/Ar mixture, raising the temperature from room temperature to 1273 K at 10 K min-1.

2.3. Catalytic tests

Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane was performed in a quartz reactor, using a propane to oxygen molar ratio of 2:1 in the reactant mixture. Temperatures in the range 473-873 K were used, 0.4 g of catalyst and a space velocity of 50 mL.g-1.min-1 (298 K and 1 atm) were used. For the catalyst that showed the best performance, different space velocities were tested. During each reaction, the effluent of the reactor was analyzed in a Shimadzu GC-9A gas chromatograph equipped with TCD detector and Molecular Sieve 5A and Porapack Q columns. Calculations of conversion, selectivity, and yield of the reaction for each catalyst were carried out. The main products were propene, CO2 and CO, and some traces of CH4 and C2H4.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD)

ϕy phase assignation for the material denominated CoMoϕy, Figure 1(a), was performed through comparison between the obtained diffractogram and the one reported by Pezerat [22] and Levin et al. [23]. The diffractogram for CoMoϕy calcined at 623 K corresponds to β-CoMoO4 phase, which has been previously reported by Smith [24] also in agreement with the pattern of the Powder Diffraction File (PDF 21-868) database. According to literature, this phase is stable at high temperatures; therefore, no changes are expected in the structure of the material at temperatures above 623 K. The material denominated CoWsϕy apparently is a semi-crystalline phase or a phase in formation process, Figure 1(b). When this material is calcined, a low crystalline wolframite-type cobalt tungstate (PDF 72-0479) is obtained.

Figure 1 XRD patterns for A: (1) CoMoϕy, (2) CoMoϕy calcined at 623K, (3) CoMoϕy calcined at 873K, (4) β-CoMoO4 pattern. B: (1) CoWsϕy, (2) CoWsϕy calcined at 673K, (3) CoWO4 pattern 

Thermal analysis (TA)

For CoMoϕy, Figure 2(a), a weight loss of 11.9% is observed between 373 K and 623 K, which corresponds to two exothermic events related to the evolution of volatile species from the lamellar solid, crystallization water and ammonia, the latter present in the structure as balance cation. In contrast, with CoWsϕy (Figure 2(b)), an apparent single event between 373 K and 673 K is observed, with a weight loss of 5.6%. However, a shoulder is observed at 570 K, the main event at 608 K is assigned to the evolution of crystallization water, and the shoulder is related to a lower amount of ammonium cation present in the CoWsϕy structure. The highest temperatures at which materials no longer present thermal events are 623 K for CoMoϕy and 673 K for CoWsϕy. For this reason, these temperatures were set as calcination temperatures to obtain the final catalysts.

Figure 2 Thermal analysis for (A) CoMoϕy (B) CoWsϕy. Solid lines represent the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), dash lines represent the differential thermal analysis (DTA) 

Temperature programmed reduction (TPR)

The TPR profiles for the calcined materials are presented in Figure 3. For CoMoϕy623 consistency with the reduction temperatures reported by Brito and Barbosa [25] for β-CoMoO4 were observed. It was established that a reduction to lower valence oxidized states takes place, generating equimolar mixtures of Co2Mo3O8 and Co2MoO4 species, followed by a high-temperature reduction to the metals; these events take place at 807 K and 1113 K respectively. Additionally, a shoulder at 973 K is observed, which can be attributed to the reduction of an amorphous phase impurity obtained when calcination of the lamellar precursor took place. This amorphous phase was not observed by X-ray diffraction.

For CoWsϕy673 the reduction events are observed from 673 K upwards, with two peaks at 1073 K, and 1123 K. Complete reduction of the material is achieved at temperatures near 1173 K. This profile is common for tungsten oxide catalysts, which present reduction at temperatures higher than 1073 K [26].

Figure 3 TPR profiles for CoMoϕy623 and CoWsϕy673 by reduction with 10% H2/Ar mixture, from room temperature to 1273 K at 10 K min-1 

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)

Infrared spectra were obtained for the precursors and the calcined materials (Figure 4). For CoMoϕy, bands at 928 and 620 cm-1 are associated with symmetric O-Mo-O stretching vibrations; the bands at 865, 806, 751 and 475 cm-1 correspond to asymmetric O-Mo-O stretching. All the bands correspond to characteristic vibration modes MoO4 2- tetrahedra. For CoMoϕy623, bands at 943, 841, 784, 704 and 418 cm-1 are observed, which correspond to the vibration bands of β-CoMoO4 structure [27]. This confirms the XRD results, cf. Figure 1(b).

Figure 4 Infrared spectra of the precursors and the calcined materials (A) CoMoϕy and (B) CoWsϕy. Black line precursors, gray line calcined materials 

In CoWsϕy spectra, bands at 915, 813 and 418 cm-1 are observed, which agree with the vibration bands observed for scheelite-type oxides, where tungsten is in tetrahedral coordination. Meanwhile, the band at 878 cm-1 is related to symmetric vibration, and the bands at 750, 682, 647, 570 and 525 cm-1 are related to the asymmetric wolframite-type oxide vibrations, where the tungsten has octahedral coordination [28, 29]. For CoWsϕy673, there is a good agreement with the reported information for wolframite [30], indicating octahedral coordination of cobalt and tungsten. The band at 873 cm-1 is related with WO6 6- octahedra symmetrical stretching, while the bands at 784, 725 and 570 cm-1 are related with asymmetric stretching of the same group; the band at 460 cm-1 corresponds to the bending of it. The deformation of the spectra is caused by the low crystallinity of the solid observed in the XRD pattern, Figure 1(b).

Catalytic tests

Figure 5(a) shows that CoMoϕy623 has a measurable catalytic activity from 523 K and CoWsϕy673 from 573 K. The propane conversions are relatively high (Figure 5(a)), taking into account the low temperatures at which catalytic activity was evaluated. The catalyst that presented the best performance, regarding conversion, was CoMoϕy623, with 18.5% conversion at 623 K, while CoWsϕy673 reached conversions smaller than 10% even at 673 K. However, selectivity (Figure 5(b)) at 623 K presents an inverse behavior to that observed with the conversion. Selectivity to propene for CoMoϕy623 tends to be stable at temperatures above 573 K, with a value close to 27%.

Figure 5 (A) Propane conversion and (B) selectivity to propene as a function of the temperature with a space velocity of 50 mLg-1min-1. CoMoϕy623 (-■-), CoWsϕy673 (-(-) 

In order to explore CoMoϕy623 as a catalyst, the reaction temperature was fixed at 623 K, and the space velocity was tested between 50 and 150 mL g-1 min-1. The results are shown in Figure 6. A high space velocity could avoid a total occupancy of the active sites available in the catalyst. Therefore, the conversion could be low. Lower space velocity implies longer contact time; this can increase the conversion and the side reactions. For CoMoϕy, the best yield at 623 K was obtained at a space velocity of 100 mL g-1 min-1. Then, higher temperatures were used to increase the conversion. For this purpose, the precursor material CoMoϕy was calcined at a higher temperature (873 K) and denominated CoMoϕy873. The XRD pattern for CoMoϕy873, Figure 1(a), did not show any significant changes in the structure, and it also corresponds to β-CoMoO4.

Figure 6 Dependence on conversion (-□-), yield to propene (-(-) and selectivity to propene (-(-) with space velocity for CoMoϕy623 at 623 K 

Conversion and selectivity values obtained with CoMoϕy623 and CoMoϕy873, at 100 mLg-1min-1 space velocity to different temperatures, are shown in Table 2. At the same temperature, CoMoϕy873 provided a smaller yield, possibly because of the decrease in the catalyst surface area occurred by the calcination of the precursor at a higher temperature. At higher temperatures, a constant behavior is observed for the selectivity of this catalyst as a function of conversion, within the experimental error. Therefore, the increasing yield obtained with CoMoϕy873 with higher temperature is due to the expected increase in conversion with temperature.

Table 2 Catalytic activity of CoMoϕy623 and CoMoϕy873 

Catalytic stability of CoMoϕy873 was tested at 773 K in continuous reaction for 24 h (see Figure 7] and no loss of catalytic activity was observed. The average conversion value was 20.6%.

Figure 7 Catalytic stability of CoMoϕy873 at 773 K and a space velocity 100 mL g-1 min-1 yield (-■-) and selectivity (-▲-) to propene. The average conversion value was 20.6 % 

The main product of the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane is propene; nevertheless, carbon oxides (CO and CO2) are usually formed as by-products via propane and propene combustion. The propane combustion reaction occurs in parallel with ODH; this explains the inability to reach a 100% selectivity to propene [31]. A consecutive oxidation of propene as a function of the temperature can be explained regarding the bond dissociation energy (BDE). The BDE for the methylene hydrogen is 98 kcal mol-1 in propane and 88 kcal mol-1 in methyl hydrogen in propene [32]; therefore, the transformation of propene to carbon oxides is promoted at higher temperatures. To avoid the oxidation, the propene desorption should be a fast step in the reaction.

The ability of the metal ions to switch between oxidation states, the electronic conductivity of the material, the mobility of lattice oxygen, as well as, the type of oxygen present at the surface are just some of the factors that can affect the activity and selectivity of a catalyst [33]. Even though, a direct comparison of the catalytic activity between CoMoϕy623 and CoWsϕy673 cannot be made for the differences in the composition and structure. The reducibility can be correlated with the redox capacity of materials, which is necessary for the catalytic activity through a Mars-vans Krevelen mechanism. In our case, CoMoϕy623 has a lower onset temperature for the reduction, as well as, the higher catalytic activity in the temperature range studied. The yields achieved with CoMoϕy623 and CoMoϕy873, at different temperatures, are comparable to the ones already reported in the literature; the best yield for cobalt-based materials is around 11% [34-36].

Moreover, the difference in the selectivity, Figure 5(b), value between cobalt molybdate and cobalt tungstate could be attributed to the cobalt, it lies in a high spin state in the tungstate, while it is in a low spin state in the molybdate. This is consistent with cobalt forming an inorganic radical (Co-O*) in the tungstate and not in the molybdate, a species highly active in attacking paraffins, improving the velocity of methylene hydrogen abstraction [37].

4. Conclusions

The synthesis method used is suitable to obtain precursors materials for the catalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. The cobalt- molybdenum precursor material was identified as CoMoϕy. After calcination of the CoMoϕy, the β-CoMoO4 (CoMoϕy623 and CoMoϕy873) phase was obtained. For the cobalt-tungsten precursor material denominated CoWsϕy is a mixture of scheelite-type oxides and wolframite-type oxide according with the FTIR and DRX results. A low crystalline wolframite-type material (CoWsϕy673) is obtained after calcination.

The best catalytic activity, based on selectivity to propene and conversion, was observed for CoMoϕy623.The good catalytic performance of this material was related to a low onset temperature in the hydrogen reduction profiles. This material was tested at higher temperatures, the selectivity was constant, and the conversion increased. This material is promising for the ODH of propane.

The cobalt-tungsten material is interesting because it exhibited a high selectivity, then it is recommended to study other reaction variables to increase the conversion.

5. Acknowledgments

We thank CODI of Universidad de Antioquia, Colciencias and CNPq for partial financial support.

6. References

1. K. G. Mittal, “Cracking paraffinic hydrocarbons to make alpha olefins-a review,” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 291-299, 1986. [ Links ]

2. D. Sanfilippo and I. Miracca, “Dehydrogenation of paraffins: synergies between catalyst design and reactor engineering,” Catal. Today, vol. 111, no. 1-2, pp. 133-139, 2006. [ Links ]

3. K. Seshan, “Oxidative conversion of lower alkanes to olefins,” Catalysis, vol. 22, pp. 119-143, 2010. [ Links ]

4. F. Cavani, N. Ballarini, and A. Cericola, “Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane: How far from commercial implementation?,” Catal. Today , vol. 127, no. 1-4, pp. 113-131, 2007. [ Links ]

5. A. F. Wagner, I. R. Slagle, D. Sarzynski, and D. Gutman, “Experimental and theoretical studies of the ethyl + oxygen reaction kinetics,” J. Phys. Chem., vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1853-1868, 1990. [ Links ]

6. C. A. Carrero, R. Schloegl, I. E. Wachs, and R. Schomaecker, “Critical Literature Review of the Kinetics for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane over Well-Defined Supported Vanadium Oxide Catalysts,” ACS Catal., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 3357-3380, 2014. [ Links ]

7. F. Cavani and F. Trifirò, “The oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane as an alternative way for the production of light olefins,” Catal. Today , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 307-313, 1995. [ Links ]

8. H. H. Kung and M. C. Kung, “Oxidative dehydrogenation of alkanes over vanadium-magnesium-oxides,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., vol. 157, no. 1-2, pp. 105-116, 1997. [ Links ]

9. K. Alexopoulos, M. F. Reyniers, and G. B. Marin, “Reaction path analysis of propane selective oxidation over V2O5 and V2O5/TiO2,” J. Catal., vol. 289, pp. 127-139, 2012. [ Links ]

10. A. Qiao et al., “Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene over V2O5/Nb2O5 catalysts,” Catal. Commun., vol. 30, pp. 45-50, 2013. [ Links ]

11. P. Viparelli et al., “Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over vanadium and niobium oxides supported catalysts,” Appl. Catal . A: Gen., vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 291-301, 1999. [ Links ]

12. X. Fan et al., “Synthesis of a new ordered mesoporous NiMoO4 complex oxide and its efficient catalytic performance for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane,” J. Energy Chem., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 171-178, 2014. [ Links ]

13. B. Pillay, M. R. Mathebula, and H. B. Friedrich, “The oxidative dehydrogenation of n-hexane over Ni-Mo-O catalysts,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., vol. 361, no. 1-2, pp. 57-64, 2009. [ Links ]

14. F. Dury, M. A. Centeno, E. M. Gaigneaux, and P. Ruiz, “An attempt to explain the role of CO2 and N2O as gas dopes in the feed in the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane,” Catal. Today , vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 95-105, 2003. [ Links ]

15. G. Che, R. Quintana, R. S. Ruiz, J. S. Valente, and C. O. Castillo, “Kinetic modeling of the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene over a MoVTeNbO catalytic system,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 252, pp. 75-88, 2014. [ Links ]

16. P. Sazama et al., “Structure and critical function of Fe and acid sites in Fe-ZSM-5 in propane oxidative dehydrogenation with N2O and N2O decomposition,” J. Catal ., vol. 299, pp. 188-203, 2013. [ Links ]

17. M. A. Botavina et al., “Oxidative dehydrogenation of C3-C4 paraffins in the presence of CO2 over CrOx/SiO2 catalysts,” Appl. Catal. A Gen., vol. 347, no. 2, pp. 126-132, 2008. [ Links ]

18. M. A. Larrubia J. M. Blasco, L. J. Alemany, and C. Herrera, “Estudio de la catálisis de la deshidrogenación oxidativa del propano: empleo de sistemas catalíticos multimetálicos soportados,” Ing. Química, vol. 424, pp. 132-144, 2005. [ Links ]

19. B. Solsona et al., “Supported Ni-W-O Mixed Oxides as Selective Catalysts for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane,” Top. Catal., vol. 52, no. 6-7, pp. 751-757, 2009. [ Links ]

20. M. Salamanca, Y. E. Licea, A. Echavarría, A. C. Faro, and L. A. Palacio, “Hydrothermal synthesis of new wolframite type trimetallic materials and their use in oxidative dehydrogenation of propane,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 11, no. 41, pp. 9583-9591, 2009. [ Links ]

21. B. Farin, M. Devillers, andE. M. Gaigneaux . “Nanostructured hybrid materials as precursors of mesoporous NiMo-based catalysts for the propane oxidative dehydrogenation,” Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 242, pp. 200-207, 2017. [ Links ]

22. H. Pezerat, “Problemes de non-stoechiométrie dans certains molybdates hydratés de zinc, cobalt et nickel,” Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr., vol. 90, pp. 549-552, 1967. [ Links ]

23. D. Levin, S. L. Soled, and J. Y. Ying, “Crystal Structure of an Ammonium Nickel Molybdate Prepared by Chemical Precipitation,” Inorg. Chem., vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 4191-4197, 1996. [ Links ]

24. G. W. Smith, “The crystal structures of cobalt molybdate CoMoO4 and nickel molybdate NiMoO4,” Acta Crytallographica, vol. 15, pp. 1054-1057, 1962. [ Links ]

25. J. Brito and A. L. Barbosa, “Effect of Phase Composition of the Oxidic Precursor on the HDS Activity of the Sulfided Molybdates of Fe(II), Co(II), and Ni(II),” J. Catal ., vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 467-475, 1997. [ Links ]

26. M. Suvanto, J. Räty, and T. A. Pakkanen, “Catalytic activity of carbonyl precursor based W/Al2O3 and CoW/Al2O3 catalysts in hydrodesulfurization of thiophene,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 189-199, 1999. [ Links ]

27. I. Matsuura, S. Mizuno, and H. Hashiba, “Acidic properties of molybdate-based catalysts for propylene oxidation,” Polyhedron, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp. 111-117, 1986. [ Links ]

28. A. de Oliveira et al., “Yellow ZnxNi1−xWO4 pigments obtained using a polymeric precursor method,” Dye. Pigment., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 210-216, 2008. [ Links ]

29. G. M. Clark and W. P. Doyle, “Infra-red spectra of anhydrous molybdates and tungstates,” Spectrochim. Acta, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1441-1447, 1966. [ Links ]

30. S. A. Redfern, “Hard-mode infrared study of the ferroelastic phase transition in CuWO4 - ZnWO4 mixed crystals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 5761-5765, 1993. [ Links ]

31. K. Chen, E. Iglesia, and A. T. Bell, “Kinetic Isotopic Effects in Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane on Vanadium Oxide Catalysts,” J. Catal ., vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 197-203, 2000. [ Links ]

32. Y. R. Luo, Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds, 1 st ed. Florida, USA: CRC Press, 2002. [ Links ]

33. G. Centi, F. Cavani andF. Trifirò , Selective Oxidation by Heterogeneous Catalysis (Fundamental and Applied Catalysis), 1 st ed. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2001 [ Links ]

34. S. Sugiyama, T. Shono, D. Makino, T. Moriga, and H. Hayashi, “Enhancement of the catalytic activities in propane oxidation and H-D exchangeability of hydroxyl groups by the incorporation with cobalt into strontium hydroxyapatite,” J. Catal ., vol. 214, no. 1, pp. 8-14, 2003. [ Links ]

35. D. Stern and R. K. Grasselli, “Propane Oxydehydrogenation over Molybdate-Based Catalysts,” J. Catal ., vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 550-559, 1997. [ Links ]

36. B. Y. Jibril and S. Ahmed, “Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over Co, Ni and Mo mixed oxides/MCM-41 catalysts: Effects of intra- and extra-framework locations of metals on product distributions,” Catal. Commun ., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 990-996, 2006. [ Links ]

37. D. Stern andR. K. Grasselli , “Propane Oxydehydrogenation over Metal Tungstates,” J. Catal ., vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 570-572, 1997. [ Links ]

Received: January 20, 2017; Accepted: August 09, 2017

* Corresponding author: Maurin Salamanca Guzmán e-mail: salamanca.maurin@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License