SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue101Low-cost infrared thermography in aid of photovoltaic panels degradation researchThe impact of inventory holding costs on the strategic design of supply chains author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia

Print version ISSN 0120-6230On-line version ISSN 2422-2844

Rev.fac.ing.univ. Antioquia  no.101 Medellín Oct./Dec. 2021  Epub Sep 15, 2021

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20200691 

Artículo original

Adsorption in a binary system of Pb (II) and Ni (II) using lemon peels

Adsorción en sistema binario de Pb (II) y Ni (II) utilizando cáscaras de limón

Candelaria Tejada-Tovar1  * 

Ángel Villabona-Ortíz1 

César Sierra-Ardila1 

Marlyz Meza-Acuña1 

Rodrigo Ortega-Toro2 

1Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Grupo de Investigación de Diseño de Procesos y Utilización de Biomasa, Universidad de Cartagena. Avenida del Consulado Calle 30 # 48-152. C. P. 130015. Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.

2Grupo de Investigación Food Packaging and Shelf Life (FP&SL) y Grupo de Investigación Ingeniería de Fluidos Complejos y Reología de Alimentos (IFCRA), Universidad de Cartagena. Avenida del Consulado Calle 30 # 48-52. C. P. 130015. Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.


ABSTRACT

The elimination of pollutants in water sources is a widely studied issue with the purpose of preserving the environment. In this work, the use of lemon peel (citrus lemon) as a bio-sorbent in the removal of Pb (II) and Ni (II) is studied, varying the temperature, adsorbent dose, and particle size. The materials were characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis, to determine the bio adsorbent’s physicochemical properties. FTIR and EDS techniques confirmed the precipitation of ions on the adsorbent after the adsorption process. It was found that the optimal conditions according to the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) are: particle size for Ni (II) of 1 and 0.355 mm, adsorbent dose 0.077 g and 0.117 g, and temperatures of 34 and 45 ºC, for Pb (II) and Ni (II), respectively. The results reported that the Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm and the pseudo-second-order model are more in line with the experimental data, suggesting that the adsorption process is driven by physisorption and occurs in multilayers. Thermodynamic parameters suggest that the process is exothermic for Ni (II) and endothermic for Pb (II), and irreversible. The binary study showed that there is no competition for active sites between the ions.

Keywords: Mathematical models; thermodynamics; metals; wastewater

RESUMEN

La eliminación de contaminantes en fuentes hídricas es un tema ampliamente estudiado con el fin de preservar el medio ambiente. En este trabajo, se estudia el uso de cáscara de limón (Citrus limon) como bio-adsorbente en la remoción de Pb (II) y Ni (II), variando la temperatura, dosis de adsorbente y tamaño de partícula. Los materiales se caracterizaron por análisis de Espectroscopia Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier (FTIR), Microscopía Electrónica de Barrido (SEM) y Espectroscopia de dispersión de energía de rayos X (EDS) para determinar las propiedades fisicoquímicas de los bio-adsorbentes. Las técnicas FTIR y EDS confirmaron la precipitación de iones sobre el adsorbente después del proceso de adsorción. Se encontró que las condiciones óptimas de acuerdo con la Metodología de Superficie de Respuesta (RSM) son: tamaño de partícula para Ni (II) de 1 y 0,355 mm, dosis de adsorbente 0,077 g y 0,117 g, y temperaturas de 34 y 45 ºC, para Pb (II) y Ni (II), respectivamente. Los resultados informaron que la isoterma de Dubinin-Radushkevich y el modelo de pseudo-segundo orden se ajustan mejor a los datos experimentales, lo que sugiere que el proceso de adsorción se rige por fisisorción y se da en multicapas. Los parámetros termodinámicos sugieren que el proceso es exotérmico para Ni (II) y endotérmico para Pb(II), e irreversible. El estudio binario mostró que no hay competencia por los sitios activos entre los iones.

Palabras claves: Modelo matemático; termodinámica; metal; agua residual

1. Introduction

Metals are naturally redistributed in the environment by geological and biological cycles. Among the biological cycles of movement of metals are the processes of biomagnification and bioaccumulation. These phenomena happen when a substance is present in low concentrations at the beginning of the food chain and increases in proportion as it moves up the food chain[1, 2]. Metals can be distributed in the environment due to anthropogenic activities, which shorten their residence time in mineral deposits and result in the formation of new metal compounds of unnatural origin[3, 4]. The industry mostly performs a global distribution of metals in the environment by discharge to land, water and air[5].

Lead is used in different types of industries, in the petrochemical industry, it is employed to make batteries, pigments and paints, and in agriculture, it is utilised to make fertilisers[6, 7]. Additionally, Wastewater effluents from processes such as electroplating, metal finishing, metallurgy, chemical manufacturing and battery manufacturing industries contain substances with the chemical species Ni0 or Ni2+[8]. These chemicals could cause cyanosis, chest pain, dry cough, extreme weakness and dizziness, rapid breathing, severe headache, illness, shortness of breath and vomiting, and in high concentrations are carcinogenic[9-11]. After the metals are used, they end up as part of the effluent from the process in which they were used, which generally receives treatment that is often inefficient and in the worst-case non-existent, generating serious contamination problems when they are discharged into water sources[12]. Thus, there is a great need for a simple, effective, and low-cost method of treatment for the disposal of metals in wastewater[13, 14]. In this sense, adsorption processes are presented as an alternative, since when combined with an appropriate desorption step and avoiding the problem of adsorbent removal, they are an effective, versatile, and low-cost method that makes it sustainable for the removal of contaminants. However, commercial adsorbents tend to be expensive, so new economical adsorbents with high removal capacity have been examined[15].

Different lignocellulosic biomasses have been used in the removal of Pb (II) and Ni (II), such as millet[16], lime[9, 17], rice husks[16, 18], black walnut bark[19], among others[20-24]; presenting high removal yields. The objective of the present study is to use the lemon peel as a bio-adsorbent of Pb(II) and Ni(II) in aqueous solution in selective and multicomponent systems, in the latter case, since both for industrial discharges and wastewater discharges the pollutants are mixed. The interaction between these pollutants should be studied, evaluating the effect of temperature, adsorbent dose, and particle size on the process.

2. Methodology

2.1 Materials

The lemon peels were collected from a commercial market in Cartagena, Bolivar. Silver nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) and nickel sulphate (NiSO₄), Sigma Aldrich brand analytical grade, were used to prepare the solutions. Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) and Hydrochloric Acid were used to adjust the pH of the solutions.

2.2 Preparation and characterization of biomass

The agricultural residues were washed to remove impurities, sun-dried to a constant mass, and the particle size was reduced (0.355, 0.677 and 1 mm).

Then, the biomaterial was characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis in a Shimadzu IRAinfinity-1S spectrophotometer with a frequency of 32 scans between 400-4,000 cm-1, in the purpose of identifying the functional groups that would work as active centres during the process of metal removal. The morphological properties and elemental composition of the biomass were determined using a Scanning Electron Microscope together with an energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) model JSM-6490LV JEOL Ltd. All trials were conducted before and after the metal removal process.

2.3 Adsorption study

Adsorption tests were performed following a continuous linear factor experiment design, on a central composite response surface: Star, considering a randomized central point for each established range provided by the Statgraphics Centurion 16.1.15 software. The response variable was the percentage of removal, and the independent variables were particle size (0.355, 0.677 and 1 mm), temperature (40, 55, 70 ºC) and adsorbent concentration (0.15, 0.325 and 0.5 g) at 200 rpm, and pH 5 for Lead (II) and 6 for Nickel (II). An orbital shaker, MAXQ 4450, was used to place the contaminated solution in contact with the adsorbent under the different conditions established in the design of the experiments. The residual concentration was determined by atomic absorption at 217 nm for Pb(II) and 232 nm for Ni(II). Adsorption efficiency and capacity were determined by Equations (1) and (2), where C 0 is the initial contaminant concentration and C f the final concentration in mg/L, V the volume in L, m the amount of adsorbent, %R the removal efficiency and q the adsorption capacity of the bio-adsorbent.

2.4 Kinetic study and modelling of balance

The kinetic study was carried out under the best conditions found after applying the Response Surface Methodology (RSM), taking 8 samples at different intervals during 24 h. For this, 10 mL of solution at 0.5 mmol/L at 200 rpm was placed in contact. The data were then fitted to the kinetic models (Pseudo-First Order, Pseudo-Second Order, Elovich and Intraparticle Diffusion) using OriginPro 8.5 to calculate the fitting parameters and R2. Adsorption equilibrium was performed for 24 h by varying the initial concentration of contaminant (20, 40, 60 and 80 mg/L for Pb (II) and 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/L for Ni (II). Langmuir and Freundlich's models were used to adjust the data.

2.5 Thermodynamic parameters

The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent Qt, the equilibrium constant Kc and the values of adsorption enthalpy ∆Hº, adsorption entropy ∆Sº and Gibbs energy ∆Gº were calculated to establish the favourability of the process and the effect that temperature has on it. For this purpose, temperature values corresponding to a typical adsorbent dose were selected, the final ion concentration was tabulated for each of the different temperatures, and the parameters were calculated according to Equations (3), (4), (5) and (6), applying Van't Hoff's graphic method.

Where, Kc is the equilibrium constant, qe is the equilibrium solid phase concentration (mg/g), and Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/g), R is the ideal gas constant 8.314 J/molK, T is the absolute temperature in K. The ΔH° and ΔS° are determined from the slope and the Y-axis intercept of Arrhenius of lnKc vs T -1 , respectively.

3. Results

3.1 Characterization techniques

The process of adsorption is a physicochemical phenomenon that involves many steps and mechanisms, consequently many factors can intervene during ion exchange between the bio-adsorbent and sorbate. Thus, the presence of functional groups involved in the adsorption was determined by Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and are shown in Figure 1, confirming the complexity of lignocellulosic materials[23].

Figure 1 IR spectrum of the lemon peel before and after Pb(II) and Ni(II) adsorption 

A peak at 3,314.61 cm-1 is observed, shown in the spectrum before the adsorption process, which is an indication of the stretching of hydroxyl groups in the molecular structure of the lemon peel[25, 26]. Also, vibrations are observed at 3,390.28 cm-1 (ternary amines), 2,931.01 cm-1 (methoxy and aliphatic hydrocarbons), 1,652.11 cm-1 (C=C), 1,420.81 cm-1 (C-C), 1,339.79 cm-1 (NO2), and 1,156.40 cm-1 (C-O). After the removal of Pb(II) and Ni(II), a spike shift and widening are observed, which can be attributed to the bonding of the metal ions with the identified active centres[27].

Figure 2 shows the SEM microphotography of the lemon peel before and after the removal of Pb(II) and Ni(II). The surface of the biomaterial is irregular, and porous allowing a better heterogeneous biosorption due to the large interface [Figure 2a); moreover, it presents small white spots which are caused by the presence of Calcium, Aluminium and Potassium in its structure [Figure 3a). The SEM micrographs after adsorption [Figures 2b and 2c), show Pb(II) and Ni(II) agglomerations on their surface, which can be attributed to the formation of chelates in the samples[28]. This fact is confirmed in the EDS analysis after metal removal, Figures 3b and 3c, which show the appearance of the characteristic high-intensity peaks for Pb and Ni at 1.7 and 0.8 keV, respectively. This event was due to the mechanisms that appear during the adsorption process of metals on bio-adsorbents, which include ion exchange, microprecipitation, complexation and coordination, due to the presence of functional groups on the surface of the adsorbent[29, 30].

Figure 2 SEM micrographs of lemon peel (a) unsaturated and after adsorption of, (b) Pb (II) and (c) Ni (II) 

Figure 3 shows the spectrogram and elemental composition of the selected biomasses obtained by EDS analysis after the Pb(II) and Ni(II) adsorption process. Figure 3a revealed that carbon and oxygen contribute more to the elemental composition of the biomass, which is attributed to the organic nature of the lignocellulosic residues[27], and its ability to capture cations by electrostatic forces[31]. The presence of both heavy metals on the adsorption surface was evidenced with a mass percentage of 0.26 and 0.11%, respectively. After removal of Pb (II), the disappearance of aluminium was evidenced, this was found in 0.24% in the structure of lemon peel. In the same way, the decrease of calcium and potassium [Figures 3b and 3c).

Figure 3 EDS spectrum of lemon peel (a) unsaturated and after adsorption of, (b) Pb (II) and (c) Ni (II) 

These results can be attributed to the formation of links between the active sites of materials and lignocellulosic ions[32]. Also, there was a decrease in the presence of C in the biomaterial. This fact was due to the saturation of active sites at sampling time. In EDS spectra, after the adsorption of Pb (II) the disappearance of Al is observed at 1.8 keV, and of Ca at 0.6 keV. On the other hand, after removing Ni (II), there was an increase in K in 0.2 and 3.4 and Ca growth in 3.4 keV. From the previous behaviour, a conservation in the variation of the equivalent charges was found between Ni (II), Pb (II) and Ca (II) / K, so that the ions present more competition understudy for the functional groups whereby cation exchange occurs in the active centres of the bio adsorbent. In the same way, the formation of micro-complexes and micro-precipitations on the surface of the lemon peel could take place[30]. The increase in the atomic percentage of Ca and K after Ni (II) adsorption shows that these elements precipitate in calcium and potassium phosphate and phosphate forms on the surface of the biomaterial, which is seen in the white particles in SEM micrographs[33, 34].

3.2 Particle size effect

The particle size at adsorption is a determining parameter, as it is related to the surface contact area of the bio-adsorbent and the availability of active sites[35]. In Figure 4, the effect of particle size for Pb(II) and Ni(II) using lemon peel is shown. It was found that the highest adsorption efficiencies were achieved using 1 mm size, with 95.33% lead adsorption performance and a final concentration of 4.66 mg/L, and 62.133 %, for 0.355 mm size nickel with a final concentration of 37.86 mg/L.

Figure 4 Effect of particle size on the removal of Pb(II) and Ni(II) 

Adsorption takes place mainly inside the particles, on the pore walls at specific points. Therefore the amount of adsorbate (solute) that can be adsorbed is directly proportional to the volume of the pores, and this volume is directly proportional to the external contact area[36]. The results shown in Figure 1 may indicate the possibility that the adsorption of the metal ions occurs inside the particles through the porosities of the biomaterial. Also, a small particle has a larger surface area, thus increasing the number of pores per unit mass[37]. In other words, when the size of the particles decreases, the number of active centres per unit is higher, and the adsorption capacity increases[38]. Likewise, the nature of the pollutant and the selectivity of the active sites are determining factors during the adsorption processes[39].

3.3 Effect of temperature and dose of adsorbent

The dosage study is essential in adsorption experiments to determine the proportion between the mass of the adsorbent and the initial metal concentration. The removal efficiency is highly dependent on the type and amount of adsorbent, so a dose increment generally increases the amount of ion adsorbed due to the larger area available for the process[40]. On the other hand, the temperature is a parameter that provides information about nature and forces that control the process[41]. Figure 5 shows the Pareto diagram for Pb(II) and Ni(II) adsorption. It was observed that temperature significantly affects the removal process in a negative way, while the dose of adsorbent is the most influential variable in the process.

Figure 5 Standardized Pareto chart to remove (a) Ni (II) and (b) Pb (II) 

In Table 1, the results obtained from the analysis of variance with a 95% confidence level are shown, finding that, 0 effects have a P-value lower than 0.05, indicating that they are significantly different from zero with a 95.0% confidence level. It is observed that the factor that may have greater relevance in the design is the amount of adsorbent (g).

Table 1 Analysis of variance of Pb (II) and Ni (II) adsorption 

Figures 6 and 7 show the variation in the percentage of adsorption concerning temperature and the dose of the adsorbent for Ni(II) and Pb(II), respectively. The decrease in the percentage of Ni (II) removal is proportional to the increase in temperature, which suggests that this process is exothermic, and it does not need an energy supply to the system. In this way, it would increase the kinetic energy of the ions weakening the interaction forces between adsorbate and adsorbent, and favouring the desorption of the sorbate molecules over the bio-sorbent structure. Since by gaining more energy than the bonds formed between the compounds support, the forces of interaction are reduced, causing the release of what is not desired; this is promoted by the temperature, decreasing the net adsorption capacity of the adsorbent[42-44].

Figure 6 Effect of temperature and dosage of adsorbent on Ni (II) removal 

Figure 7 Effect of temperature and dosage of adsorbent on lead (II) removal 

From the adsorption tests carried out, the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used to determine the optimal conditions of particle size, adsorbent dose, and temperature. The optimal adsorption conditions are shown in Table 2 and will be used to perform the kinetic and equilibrium study.

Table 2 Optimal adsorption conditions 

3.4 Modelling of adsorption kinetics

The adsorption kinetics of an adsorbate provides information about the saturation time of the adsorbent and the maximum adsorption capacity before saturation is reached [45]. The adsorption kinetics of Pb(II) and Ni (II) on the lemon peel, respectively, are shown in Figures 8 and 9, as well as the fit to the Pseudo-First Order (PFO), Pseudo-Second Order (PSO) and Elovich models. The adjustment parameters to the kinetic models are shown in Table 3.

Figure 8 Modelling Pb (II) adsorption kinetics 

Based on Figures 5 and 6, it is established that the adsorption of the ions occurs rapidly in the first minutes of the process, due to the availability of active sites, the equilibrium times were 180 and 300 min for Pb (II) and Ni (II), respectively. In the case of both metals, about 70% of equilibrium concentration was reached at minute 120, indicating saturation of available sites in the adsorbent. Therefore, the capacity does not change significantly at longer times.

Figure 9 Modelling of Ni (II) adsorption kinetics 

From the model fit, it was found that pseudo-first order and pseudo-second-order models show a better description of the experimental adsorption data for both metals. From the values of the constants k1 and k2, it is determined that the initial absorption rate for lead is lower than for Ni. It can be said that two active sites in the biomass adsorb the ions and that the process occurs by chemisorption. This fact is due to the formation of chemical bonds between adsorbent and adsorbate at the surface[46, 47]. However, the Elovich model also fits well, so it is established that adsorption takes place inside the pores of the particles of the biomaterial and that their active sites are heterogeneous, which corresponds to the FTIR spectrum of lemon peel [Figure 1], where the complexity of the material is evidenced by the presence of multiple functional groups in its structure, characteristic of its lignocellulosic nature, as well as the high presence of C and O shown in the EDS spectrum [Figure 3a); hence, they exhibit different activation energies throughout the adsorption process[48, 49].

Table 3 Nickel and Lead Adsorption Kinetics Adjustment Parameters 

Adjusting the adsorption kinetics of Ni (II) and Pb (II) on the lemon peel suggests that the adsorption is carried out in two steps. Firstly, the metal diffuses through the solution until it reaches the external surface of the bio-adsorbent, so there would be a rapid adsorption rate during the first minutes of the process and micro-precipitates would form in the external contact area [Figures 3b and 3c)[50, 51]. In the second one, there would be the process of diffusion of Lead and Nickel through the pores of the adsorbent material, so that the process would take place in multiple internal active sites until saturation is reached, promoting the formation of complexes. Likewise, as the graph cuts the origin, it can be said that the mechanisms that dominate the removal process are intraparticle diffusion and chemical and physical adsorption[52].

3.5 Adsorption equilibrium

The adjustment of the lead and nickel adsorption equilibrium data is shown in Figures 10 and 11, respectively. The Langmuir, Freundlich and Dubinin-Radushkevich isothermal models were used and valuated by nonlinear regression. This process establishes the driving forces governing the interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent and the fitting parameters are shown in Table 3.

Figure 10 Fitting to Pb adsorption isotherms 

It was found that both models adjust the Pb (II) adsorption equilibrium data satisfactorily, which indicates that both mechanisms have an incidence. However, physical forces prevail over these, and the formation of a monolayer limits the process, no desorption reaction is considered. The number of species adsorbed does not exceed the number of active site[53]. The Freundlich model predicts the process of Ni (II) adsorption, so it can be said that during the adsorption process multilayers are formed on the surface of the biomaterials with a non-uniform distribution of heat and adsorption affinities on the heterogeneous surface. The active sites of absorption are occupied first by strong bonds, and this force decreases as they are occupied by the ions[54, 55]. The value of Freundlich's constant n [Table 4], is not in the range 1-10 which indicates that the chemical bonds formed between the ions and adsorbent are weak[56, 57].

Figure 11 Fitting to Ni adsorption isotherm models 

From equilibrium data to the Dubinin-Radushkevich model, a good fit was found for the Ni (II) and Pb (II) isotherm, with an R2 higher than 0.98 in both cases and a qmax close to the experimental one. The values reported for parameter E (average adsorption energy per adsorbate molecule required to transfer one mole of the ion from the solution to the adsorbent surface), suggest that the process is mostly controlled by physisorption[58]. The fit of the data to this model assumes that the lemon peel presents a heterogeneous structure, as shown in the FTIR spectrum [Figure 1] due to the presence of the multiple characteristic functional groups of the hydrocarbon lignocellulosic compounds. The Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm requires this kind of materials since it assumes that active sites have different activation energies[58].

Table 4 Setting parameters of the Pb (II) and Ni (II) adsorption isotherm models 

3.6 Thermodynamic parameters

The change in Gibbs' standard free energy (ΔG°), standard enthalpy (ΔH°) and standard entropy (ΔS°) as a result of temperature allows establishing the possible mechanisms of adsorption process (endothermic/exothermic, favourability and spontaneity of the process). The thermodynamic parameters mentioned were calculated by applying the Van't Hoff graphical method and Equations 3 to 6. Results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Thermodynamic parameters calculated for the adsorption of Pb(II) and Ni(II) with lemon peel 

The positive value of enthalpy for Pb(II) shows that the process is endothermic, while that of Ni(II) is exothermic, which is consistent with the effect graphs [Figures 3 and 4][59]. The negative values of ΔS suggest that the biomass has an affinity for the ion forming strong bonds on the surface, thus obtaining a low possibility of reversibility[59]. The positive values of Gibbs' free energy indicate that the adsorption process is not spontaneous or favourable, and the reaction is not feasible at high temperatures[35, 60].

3.7 Adsorption in binary system

Figure 12 shows the lead adsorption in the presence of Nickel (29.345 mg/L) while varying the initial lead concentration (41.4, 103.6 and 207.2 mg/L.), the results are also compared with the individual Nickel adsorption. It was found that the adsorption of these two metals is not significantly affected by the simultaneous presence of the other in solution.

Figure 12 Adsorption of Pb (II) in the presence of Ni (II) 

However, Figure 12 shows the gradual increase in the adsorption capacity of Ni (II) in the presence of Pb (II). This is because the two metals in solution would increase the electrostatic force between the ion and the active sites of the contaminant, causing the increase in the adsorption capacity of the bio-sorbent, with Pb (II) having a higher affinity for the active sites[61]. An increase in the adsorption capacity of Ni (II) was observed from 3.69 mg/g to 4.57 mg/g, which represents an increase of 19.26%, as the concentration of Pb (II) increased from 41.1 to 207.7 mg/L. In contrast, the adsorption capacity of Pb (II) was 8.32%. This event could be because both metals compete for the active centres of the biomaterial and to a possible crosslinking of the adsorption sites so that a small amount of Ni (II) could replace Pb (II) during the adsorption process, as the concentration of the interfering metal increased[62, 63].

Figure 13 shows the adsorption of Nickel in the presence of Lead by varying the initial concentration of nickel (11.7, 29.3 and 58.6 mg/L), comparing the results for individual Lead adsorption. It was found that the behaviour for the metals is similar to that presented during the binary assays of Pb(II) in the presence of Ni(II), since the removal capacity of Pb(II) increased. Likewise, nickel obtains high adsorption, so it is noted that the lemon peel presents a significant amount of active sites to allow high adsorption of both metals, with very low interference[64]. Despite the concentration of both metals increased when found in the binarye system, the increase was lower than in the previous system, because Pb (II) concentration of only grew by 0.41% and that of Ni (II) by 18%. The lower adsorption capacity of the Ni (II) ion is related to that, the higher hydration energy of this ion compared to the Pb (II) ion (2,105.0 kJ/mol for Nickel and 1,500.6 kJ/mol for Lead)[65, 66]. Furthermore, the lower adsorption capacity of the Ni (II) ion may also be due to its lower covalent binding index (5.63) compared to the Pb (II) ion (11.1), so that Lead has a greater tendency to form covalent bonds with adsorbent ligands[67].

Figure 13 Ni (II) adsorption in the presence of Pb (II) 

4. Conclusions

The characterization of biomaterials shows the presence of hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups, corresponding to cellulose and lignin, which are attributed to participating in the adsorption process. It was found that the best conditions for Ni removal were 1 mm, 0.0783 g of adsorbent and 45 ºC, while for Pb (II) they were 1 mm, 0.1166 g of adsorbent and 34 ºC. With these conditions, the best adsorption capacity for Pb and Ni with lemon peel were 304.5 mg/g and 72.03 mg/g, respectively. Adsorption kinetics was adjusted by the Pseudo-Second Order model and the Dubinin-Radushkevich model, a good fit was found for the Ni (II) and Pb (II) isotherm, suggesting that the process is mostly controlled by physisorption. From the thermodynamic study it was established that the adsorption process of Pb (II) is endothermic and that of Ni (II) is exothermic, and that the removal of both metals is irreversible. The binary study did not show competition between the ions for the active sites of the adsorbent, which may be related to the number of sites available and their selectivity by one of the cations.

6. Acknowledgements

The authors thank University of Cartagena for its support in the provision of laboratory spaces and equipment.

References

[1] S. Kulbir, W. S. Abdullahi, and R. Chhotu, “Removal of heavy metals by adsorption using agricultural based residue: A review,” Res. J. Chem. Environ., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 65-74, May 2018. [ Links ]

[2] J. Liu, L. Cao, and S. Dou, “Trophic transfer, biomagnification and risk assessments of four common heavy metals in the food web of Laizhou Bay, the Bohai Sea,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 670, June 20 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.140Links ]

[3] V. Manirethan, N. Gupta, R. M. Balakrishnan, and K. Raval, “Batch and continuous studies on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution using biosynthesised melanin-coated PVDF membranes,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., October 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06310-8Links ]

[4] A. H. Rasmey, A. A. Aboseidah, and A. K. Youssef, “Application of langmuir and freundlich isotherm models on biosorption of Pb2+ by freez-dried biomass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Egyptian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 1, November 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejm.2018.2998.1050Links ]

[5] J. L. Gong et al, “Continuous adsorption of Pb(II) and methylene blue by engineered graphite oxide coated sand in fixed-bed column,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 330, March 1 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.068Links ]

[6] M. Manjuladevi, R. Anitha, and S. Manonmani, “Kinetic study on adsorption of Cr(VI), Ni(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from Cucumis melo peel,” Appl. Water Sci., vol. 8, March 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0674-1Links ]

[7] N. A. Medellín, M. G. Hernández, J. J. Salazar, G. J. Labrada, and A. Aragón, “Bioadsorción de plomo (II) presente en solución acuosa sobre residuos de fibras naturales procedentes de la industria ixtlera (Agave lechuguilla Torr. y Yucca carnerosana (Trel.) McKelvey),” Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient., vol. 33, no. 2, May 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.20937/rica.2017.33.02.08Links ]

[8] S. Buxton and et al, “Concise review of nickel human health toxicology and ecotoxicology,” Inorganics, vol. 7, no. 7, July 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7070089Links ]

[9] S. Singh and S. R. Shukla, “Theoretical studies on adsorption of Ni(II) from aqueous solution using Citrus limetta peels,” Inorganics, vol. 36, no. 6, May 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12526Links ]

[10] E. Bibaj and et al, “Activated carbons from banana peels for the removal of nickel ions,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, May 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762018-1676-0Links ]

[11] G. Genchi, A. Carocci, G. Lauria, M. S. Sinicropi, and A. Catalano, “Nickel: Human health and environmental toxicology,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, January 21 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030679Links ]

[12] S. Muthusaravanan and et al, “Phytoremediation of heavy metals: Mechanisms, methods and enhancements,” Environ. Chem. Lett., vol. 16, June 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0762-3Links ]

[13] Y. F. Lam, L. Yee, S. J. Chua, S. S. Lim, and S. Gan, “Ecotoxicology and environmental safety insights into the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics of nickel removal by environmental friendly Lansium domesticum peel biosorbent,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , vol. 127, no. 3, May 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.01.003Links ]

[14] Y. Wu and et al, “Functionalized agricultural biomass as a low-cost adsorbent: Utilization of rice straw incorporated with amine groups for the adsorption of Cr(VI) and Ni(II) from single and binary systems,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 105, Part A, January 15 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.08.017Links ]

[15] A. N. Amro, M. K. Abhary, M. M. Shaikh, and S. Ali, “Removal of lead and cadmium ions from aqueous solution by adsorption on a low-cost phragmites biomass,” Processes, vol. 7, no. 7, July 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070406Links ]

[16] S. M. Batagarawa and A. K. Ajibola, “Comparative evaluation for the adsorption of toxic heavy metals on to millet, corn and rice husks as adsorbents,” J. Anal. Pharm. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15406/japlr.2019.08.00325Links ]

[17] R. Sudha, K. Srinivasan, and P. Premkumar, “Removal of nickel (II) from aqueous solution using Citrus Limettioides peel and seed carbon,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 117, July 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.03.025Links ]

[18] S. Janyasuthiwong and et al, “Copper, lead and zinc removal from metal-contaminated wastewater by adsorption onto agricultural wastes,” Environ. Technol., vol. 36, no. 24, June 17 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1053537Links ]

[19] O. S. Lawal, O. S. Ayanda, O. O. Rabiu, and K. O. Adebowale, “Application of black walnut (Juglans nigra) husk for the removal of lead (II) ion from aqueous solution,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 75, no. 10, May 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst. 2017.125Links ]

[20] N. P. Raval, P. U. Shah, , and N. K. Shah, “Adsorptive removal of nickel(II) ions from aqueous environment: A review,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 179, September 1 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.045Links ]

[21] C. F. Carolin, P. S. Kumar, A. Saravanan, G. J. Joshiba, and M. Naushad, “Efficient techniques for the removal of toxic heavy metals from aquatic environment: A review,” Biochem. Pharmacol., vol. 5, no. 3, June 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.029Links ]

[22] J. Brizi and F. H. Martínez and E. G. Paranhos and F. García, “Evaluation of adsorption processes of metal ions in multielement aqueous systems by lignocellulosic adsorbents applying different isotherms: A critical review,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 357, February 1 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.125Links ]

[23] S. Bolisetty, M. Peydayesh, and R. Mezzenga, “Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: Review and analysis,” Chem. Soc. Rev., vol. 48, no. 2, January 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00493ELinks ]

[24] X. Hu, Y. Xue, L. Liu, Y. Zeng, and L. Long, “Preparation and characterization of Na2S-modified biochar for nickel removal,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. , vol. 25, no. 10, January 26 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1298-6Links ]

[25] M. D. De Luna and A. Murniati and W. Budianta and K. K. Rivera and R. O. Arazo, “Removal of sodium diclofenac from aqueous solution by adsorbents derived from cocoa pod husks,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, April 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.02.018Links ]

[26] E. D. Asuquo and A. D. Martin, “Sorption of cadmium (II) ion from aqueous solution onto sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) peel adsorbent: Characterisation, kinetic and isotherm studies,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. , vol. 4, no. 4, December 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.024Links ]

[27] C. Tejada-Tovar, A. Villabona-Ortíz, E. Ruiz, A. Herrera, and R. Ortega, “Characterization and use of agroindustrial by-products in the removal of metal ions in aqueous solution,” J. Teknol., vol. 81, no. 6, September 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.11113/jt. v81.13644Links ]

[28] C. Tejada-Tovar , A. Gonzalez-Delgado, andA. Villabona-Ortíz , “Characterization of residual biomasses and its application for the removal of lead ions from aqueous solution,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 21, October 23 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214486Links ]

[29] M. Basu, A. K. Guha, and L. Ray, “Adsorption behavior of cadmium on husk of lentil,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 106, February 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.11.025Links ]

[30] L. Xia, X. Xu, W. Zhu, Q. Huang, and W. Chen, “A Comparative study on the biosorption of Cd2+ onto Paecilomyces lilacinus XLA and Mucoromycote sp. XLC,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 16, no. 7, July 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160715670Links ]

[31] Y. Deng, S. Huang, C. Dong, Z. Meng, and X. Wang, “Competitive adsorption behaviour and mechanisms of cadmium, nickel and ammonium from aqueous solution by fresh and ageing rice straw biochars,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 303, May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122853Links ]

[32] O. Allahdin, J. Mabingui, M. Wartel, and A. Boughriet, “Removal of Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions by fixed-BED column using a modified brick: (Micro)structural, electrokinetic and mechanistic aspects,” Appl. Clay Sci., vol. 148, November 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.08.002Links ]

[33] X. Huang and et al, “The adsorption of Cd(II) on manganese oxide investigated by batch and modeling techniques,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 14, no. 10, September 28 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101145Links ]

[34] Z. Mahdi, Q. J. Yu, and A. E. Hanandeh, “Investigation of the kinetics and mechanisms of nickel and copper ions adsorption from aqueous solutions by date seed derived biochar,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. , vol. 6, no. 1, February 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.021Links ]

[35] H. Haroon and et al, “Equilibrium kinetic and thermodynamic studies of Cr(VI) adsorption onto a novel adsorbent of Eucalyptus camaldulensis waste: Batch and column reactors,” Korean J. Chem. Eng., vol. 33, no. 10, September 19 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0160-0Links ]

[36] N. A. Salem and S. M. Yakoot, “Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, ibuprofen adsorption using rice straw based biochar,” Int. J. Pharmacol., vol. 12, no. 7, July 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2016.729.736Links ]

[37] A. U. Haq and et al, “Evaluation of sorption mechanism of Pb (II) and Ni (II) onto Pea (Pisum sativum) peels,” J. Oleo Sci., vol. 66, no. 7, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess17020Links ]

[38] N. M. Rane, S. P. Shewale, S. V. Admane, and R. S. Sapkal, “Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by using sweet lime and orange peel powder,” in Novel Water Treatment and Separation Methods: Simulation of Chemical Processes , B. A. Bhanvase, R. P. Ugwekar, and R. B. Mankar, Eds. New York, EE.UU.: Taylor & Francis Group, 2017, p. 14. [ Links ]

[39] L. A. Romero, H. García, L. V. Gonzalez, L. A. Baldenegro, and F. Carrasco, “Functionalized adsorbents prepared from fruit peels: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for copper adsorption in aqueous solution,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 162, September 20 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017. 06.032Links ]

[40] F. Mutongo, O. Kuipa, and P. K. Kuipa, “Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using powder of potato peelings as a low cost sorbent,” Bioinorg. Chem. Appl., vol. 2014, no. 3, June 29 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/973153Links ]

[41] N. Ibisi and C. Asoluka, “Use of agro-waste (Musa paradisiaca peels) as a sustainable biosorbent for toxic metal ions removal from contaminated water,” Chem. Int., vol. 4, no. 1, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31221/osf.io/yrpvnLinks ]

[42] M. Akram, H. N. Bhatti, M. Iqbal, S. Noreen, and S. Sadaf, “Biocomposite efficiency for Cr(VI) adsorption: Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies,” Biochem. Pharmacol. , vol. 5, no. 1, February 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.002Links ]

[43] P. Premkumar andR. Sudha , “Comparative studies on the removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions using raw and modified Citrus Limettioides peel,” Indian J. Chem. Technol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 255- 265, May 2018. [ Links ]

[44] H. N. Tran, S. J. You, and H. P. Chao, “Thermodynamic parameters of cadmium adsorption onto orange peel calculated from various methods: A comparison study,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. , vol. 4, no. 3, September 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.05.009Links ]

[45] S. Afroze and T. K. Sen, “A review on heavy metal ions and dye adsorption from water by agricultural solid waste adsorbents,” Water, Air Soil Pollut., vol. 229, no. 7, July 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3869-zLinks ]

[46] K. M. Doke and E. M. Khan, “Equilibrium, kinetic and diffusion mechanism of Cr(VI) adsorption onto activated carbon derived from wood apple shell,” Arab. J. Chem., vol. 10, Supplement 1, February 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.07.031Links ]

[47] Ş. Parlayici and E. Pehlivan, “Comparative study of Cr (VI) removal by bio-waste adsorbents: Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamic,” J. Anal. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, April 6 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-019-0175-3Links ]

[48] W. Cherdchoo, S. Nithettham, and J. Charoenpanich, “Removal of Cr(VI) from synthetic wastewater by adsorption onto coffee ground and mixed waste tea,” Chemosphere, vol. 221, April 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.100Links ]

[49] M. H. Dehghani, M. Farhang, M. Alimohammadi, M. Afsharnia, and G. Mckay, “Adsorptive removal of fluoride from water by activated carbon derived from CaCl2- modified Crocus sativus leaves: Equilibrium adsorption isotherms, optimization, and influence of anions,” Chem. Eng. Commun., vol. 205, no. 7, March 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1423969Links ]

[50] S. Madala, S. K. Nadavala, S. Vudagandla, V. M. Boddu, and K. Abburi, “Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics of Cadmium (II) biosorption on to composite chitosan biosorbent,” Arab. J. Chem. , vol. 43, no. S2, August 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.017Links ]

[51] K. E. Ass, “Adsorption of cadmium and copper onto natural clay: Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies,” Glob. Nest J., vol. 20, no. 2, January 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002352Links ]

[52] X. Li C. Wang, J. Tian, J. Liu , and G. Chen, “Comparison of adsorption properties for cadmium removal from aqueous solution by Enteromorpha prolifera biochar modified with different chemical reagents,” Environ. Res., vol. 186, July 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109502Links ]

[53] E. K. Leizou, M. A. Ashraf, J. A. Chowdhury, and H. Rashid, “Adsorption studies of Pb2+ and Mn2+ ions on low-cost ddsorbent: Unripe Plantain (Musa Paradisiaca) peel biomass,” Acta Chem. Malaysia, vol. 2, no. 1, August 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26480/acmy.01.2018.11.15Links ]

[54] R. Rinaldi, Y. Yasdi, and W. L. Hutagalung, “Removal of Ni (II) and Cu (II) ions from aqueous solution using rambutan fruit peels (Nephelium lappaceum L.) as adsorbent,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2026, no. 1, October 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5065058Links ]

[55] Z. Shen, Y. Zhang, O. McMillan, F. Jin, and A. Al-Tabbaa, “Characteristics and mechanisms of nickel adsorption on biochars produced from wheat straw pellets and rice husk,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. , vol. 24, no. 14, March 31 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356017-8847-2Links ]

[56] C. Tejada-Tovar , A. Herrera , andA. Villabona-Ortíz , “Assessment of chemically modified lignocellulose waste for the adsorption of Cr (VI),” Rev. Fac. Ing., vol. 29, no. 54, January 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v29.n54.2020.10298Links ]

[57] A. Villabona-Ortíz , C. Tejada-Tovar , and R. Ortega-Toro, “Modelling of the adsorption kinetics of Chromium (VI) using waste biomaterials,” Rev. Mex. Ing. Química, vol. 19, no. 1, August 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/IA650Links ]

[58] F. Batool, J. Akbar, S. Iqbal, S. Noreen , and S. N. Abbas, “Study of isothermal, kinetic, and thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of cadmium: An overview of linear and nonlinear approach and error analysis,” Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. , vol. 2018, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3463724Links ]

[59] S. Mondal, K. Sinha, K. Aikat, and G. Halder, “Adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics of ranitidine hydrochloride onto superheated steam activated carbon derived from mung bean husk,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. , vol. 3, no. 1, March 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.11.021Links ]

[60] J. G. Meneguin and et al, “Preparation and characterization of calcium treated bentonite clay and its application for the removal of lead and cadmium ions: Adsorption and thermodynamic modeling,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 111, October 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.07.005Links ]

[61] P. Tapia, O. Pavez, N. Garrido, and B. Sepúlveda, “Remoción de iones Cobre y Niquel con cáscara de maní,” Holos, vol. 3, September 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2018.7064Links ]

[62] L. Sellaoui, G. L. Dotto, A. B. Lamine, and A. Erto, “Interpretation of single and competitive adsorption of cadmium and zinc on activated carbon using monolayer and exclusive extended monolayer models,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. , vol. 24, no. 24, August 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9562-8Links ]

[63] Y. Deng , S. Huang , D. A. Laird, X. Wang , andZ. Meng , “Adsorption behaviour and mechanisms of cadmium and nickel on rice straw biochars in single- and binary-metal systems,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. , vol. 218, March 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.081Links ]

[64] S. Ratan, I. Singh, J. Sarkar, and R. M. Naik, “The removal of nickel from waste water by modified coconut coir pith,” Chem. Sci. J., vol. 7, no. 3, July 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4172/2150-3494.1000136Links ]

[65] J. Gorimbo, B. Taenzana, A. A. Muleja, A. T. Kuvarega, and L. L. Jewell, “Adsorption of cadmium, nickel and lead ions: Equilibrium, kinetic and selectivity studies on modified clinoptilolites from the USA and RSA,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. , vol. 25, no. 31, November 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2992-0Links ]

[66] M. Osińska, “Removal of lead(II), copper(II), cobalt(II) and nickel(II) ions from aqueous solutions using carbon gels,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., vol. 81, no. 3, March 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-016-4256-0Links ]

[67] Z. Mahdi , Q. J. Yu , andA. E. Hanandeh , “Competitive adsorption of heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+) onto date seed biochar: Batch and fixed bed experiments,” Sep. Sci. Technol., vol. 54, no. 6, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1523192Links ]

Received: February 24, 2020; Accepted: June 16, 2020

* Corresponding author: Candelaria Tejada Tovar e-mail: ctejadat@unicartagena.edu.co

5. Declaration of competing interest

We declare that we have no significant competing interests including financial or non-financial, professional, or personal interests interfering with the full and objective presentation of the work described in this manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License