SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue112Methods for evaluation of corrosion rate on magnesium alloys: a review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia

Print version ISSN 0120-6230On-line version ISSN 2422-2844

Rev.fac.ing.univ. Antioquia  no.112 Medellín July/Sept. 2024  Epub June 30, 2025

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20231135 

Reporte de caso

Utilization of treated water for building construction: A case study in Egypt

Reutilización de agua para la construcción de edificios: un estudio de caso en Egipto

Amera Marey Mohammed-Hassanien1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-4766

Mohamed M Badawy2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-8436

Ahmed El-Romy3 

Sherihan Adel4 

1The Valley Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, Basic Science Department, Al- Obour 11828,Qalyubia,Egypt.

2Civil Engineering Department, High Institute for Engineering and Technology, Al-Obour (k21 Cairo/Bilbies Road), Qalyubia, Egypt

3The Valley Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, Civil Engineering Department Al- Obour 11828, Qalyubia, Egypt.

4The Valley Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, Architecture Engineering and Design Department. Al- Obour 11828, Qalyubia, Egypt.


RESUMEN

Debido al aumento del nivel de vida y al crecimiento demográfico, el ahorro de agua potable será un problema importante para las próximas generaciones. Los gobiernos se ven indirectamente afectados por la alta carga financiera debido al uso actual de aguas residuales tratadas en todos los distritos de Egipto. Como caso de estudio, se eligió la nueva capital administrativa de Egipto, dado que hoy es una de las ciudades más importantes y que su planificación se basó en convertirla en una ciudad inteligente y sostenible. El objetivo del estudio era desarrollar métodos para reemplazar el agua potable en la fabricación de hormigón con aguas residuales tratadas terciariamente, pero utilizadas para mezclar o curar el hormigón después del endurecimiento. Se realizaron evaluaciones de las propiedades del concreto fresco y endurecido para determinar la mejor calidad del agua que se puede utilizar sin comprometer la calidad o durabilidad del concreto. Los resultados de este documento servirán como guía para tomar decisiones que busquen disminuir costos y aumentar la sustentabilidad mediante el uso de aguas residuales tratadas en la fabricación de concreto sustentable para edificios, especialmente en las últimas décadas, el creciente uso de materiales de construcción ha generado considerables dificultades ambientales, particularmente en la producción de cemento portland ordinario (CPO).

Palabras claves: Recuperación de agua; reutilización del agua; hormigón sostenible; resistencia a la tracción; ciudad capital; resistencia a la compresión; revenimiento

ABSTRACT

Due to rising living standards and population growth, saving fresh water will be a significant problem for the next generation. The Government is indirectly impacted by a significant financial burden due to the current usage of treated wastewater, in all of Egypt's districts. As a case study, Egypt's new administrative capital was chosen, given that it is today one of the most important cities and that its planning was predicated on making it a smart, sustainable city. The goal of the study was to develop methods for replacing potable water in the manufacture of concrete with tertiary-treated wastewater; however, used for concrete mixing or curing after concrete hardening. Property assessments of the fresh and hardened concrete were conducted, to ascertain the best water quality that can be used without compromising the quality or durability of the concrete. ; The results of this paper will serve as a guide for decision-makers looking to decrease costs and increase sustainability by using treated wastewater in making sustainable concrete for buildings, especially in recent decades, rising construction material usage has generated considerable environmental difficulties, particularly in the production of Ordinary Portland cement (OPC).

Keywords: Water reclamation; water reuse; sustainable concrete; splitting strength; capital city; compressive strength; slump

Introduction

Egypt Government places a significant emphasis on the subject of water in terms of protecting its water resources and effective management, which has been translated into numerous, thorough, and detailed legal agreements with the nations of the Nile River, requiring them to fully comply with the agreements1-3. With population expansion and changing consumption patterns, the usage of natural resources grows dramatically. Due to rising demand, drought, groundwater depletion, and contamination, settlements face problems with their water supplies. By generating new sources of high-quality water supplies, water reclamation, recycling, and reuse might be a strategy to overcome some challenges with water resources. Water scarcity affects up to 1 million people annually and is a persistent water catastrophe 4. Water scarcity impacts large rural and urban populations, as well as the environment and agriculture. Due to the limited supply of water, especially in arid and semiarid regions, water consumption must be reasonable. Reusing water is among the best ways to conserve it. According to recent water reuse studies, replacing treated wastewater with irrigation water and industrial use water is the best water reuse strategy that is both commercially viable and generally accepted 5,6. Although there have only been a few studies on the subject, Farid H. Abed undertook one to study the replacement of fresh water using brackish groundwater and oily production waters in base course layers in sustainable pavement construction 7,8.

Complex systems that comprise sewers, chambers, pumping stations, maintenance holes, and wastewater treatment facilities make up modern wastewater management networks 9. Sewage water is primarily derived from residential sources, and it is primarily composed of water, with 0.1 percent of soluble, suspended, and settable organic and inorganic materials. Thus, sewage water is cleaned in a sewage treatment facility before being released into an inland river. Currently, rivers receive the treated effluent from sewage treatment plants. This treated effluent can also be considered as a potential source of water for particular applications with sufficient water quality control [M. Maeda et al.10]. In wealthy nations, sewage treatment plants treated effluent has been successfully applied to agriculture and industries (11, 12). One of the current options to use in building such projects and many other works is to use treated water and wastewater, which is regarded as a non-conventional water resource. According to estimates, this water resource contributes 70 million cubic meters (MCM) [per year], which, if used sustainably and responsibly, may be a reliable source of water (American Public Health Association 13).

Cement, lime, polymers, and other bonding agents, as well as fine and coarse aggregates, water, and other ingredients, come together intimately to form concrete. The dry mixture of aggregates and bonding agents forms a plastic mass when water is introduced, which is then simple to shape and sculpt into the required shape]. Around 7% of the world's total carbon dioxide (CO2) is produced by this cement 14. Cement Concrete (CC) has varying properties based on its constituents, which include relative and exact amounts of water. As a result, it is the most important building and architectural material in the world because of its formative ability to change its components, site preparation procedure, and curing process. In the same context, the components are made up of four major ingredients: water, Portland cement, aggregates, and air, comprising two parts (aggregates and paste). Aggregates are classified as fine or coarse and make up 60 to 80 percent of concrete. The paste is made up of cement water and entrained air and typically accounts for 20% to 40% of the total composite amount 15. Due to the necessity for high temperatures during the cement production process, there is also a significant energy requirement, which raises the overall cost of production 16,17. Concrete production rates have been continuously rising in recent years due to development, and they will do so in the years to come (18, 19), and 20. The phrase "green concrete" (GC) refers to concrete that has reached the plastic stage; Many long-term properties of GC essentially replace those of CC.; For example, it is defined as concrete that contains recycled materials as one of its components, or concrete whose manufacturing method is environmentally friendly and provides great performance throughout the life cycle of a building 21,22. Moreover, due to their ability to use innovative technology and alternative ecologically friendly materials, GC materials play an important role in decreasing the environmental impact of construction activities 23,24. As a result, GC has the ability to achieve both the environmental and economic goals of long-term development. Tests must be conducted on concrete in its plastic and stiff states to determine its workability, segregation, bleeding, hardness, strength, durability, and permeability 25. In concrete plants, water is used extensively for various purposes, including manufacturing concrete and cleaning patios, washing concrete mixer trucks, and sprinkling aggregates with water to lessen dust 26.

Regarding water utilization, using wastewater instead of potable water can make concrete production more environmentally friendly. Water is used in significant amounts in the building and public works industries, particularly in the production of concrete 27. In fact, concrete ranks second in terms of global usage only to water (10 billion m3/year, or 1.5 m3/person) 28. 150 liter of mixing water is used to manufacture one cubic meter of concrete 29. For washing concrete pumps, equipment, aggregates, curing concrete, and ready-to-use concrete, enormous amounts of drinking water are required (30, 31). As a result, the study of the life cycle analysis of building materials is significantly impacted by the consumption of water resources. It is critical to decrease fresh water consumption in all industries, especially the building sector, as water becomes more limited 32. The construction of 1 m3 of concrete (with a cement: sand: gravel ratio of 1:1.08:1.96 and water: cement ratio of 0.44) may use more than 220 L of water because water consumption is dependent on the ratio of water to cement 33. In the case of the presence of hydroxides and carbonates as well as the enhanced particle concentration, concrete mixed with wastewater exhibits high pH values, between 11 and 12, and high alkalinity 34. Due to these features, the effluent must be treated before being disposed of, whether in water or soil. It is important to eliminate impurities impairing the concrete's setting time, construction, and durability. These impurities can interfere with cement hydration reactions and the synthesis of its components in the water used to mix the concrete.

The development's environmental impact can be reduced by using water wisely throughout the process. It is important to use as little water as possible when building a structure, and disposing of old and contaminated water properly will help minimize the environmental impact of construction. Design and construction methods used in sustainable architecture avoid or reduce the damaging effects that the construction sector has on the environment 35. Most well-known sustainability initiatives strongly emphasize on energy efficiency and the environment, water quality and resources, site selection and development, indoor environmental quality, and material quality and resources. Getting closer to better sustainability is difficult because of the aforementioned complicated interrelationships 36. In this context, this study aims to use treated wastewater (TW) instead of potable water to produce concrete for Egypt's new administrative capital city and to explore ways to save the nation with vast quantities of clean water, especially in light of the current water crisis 37. This work set out to find ways to partially or entirely substitute tertiary-treated wastewater for potable water in the production of concrete. Property evaluations of the freshly laid and cured concrete were implemented in order to determine the best water quality that may be used without sacrificing the quality or longevity of concrete.

Materials and methods

From the sewage treatment plant at The Valley Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, Al- Obour, Egypt, samples of reclaimed wastewater (TWW) were taken and chemically examined according to The Egyptian Code for the Design and Implementation of Concrete Structures 2017.

Table 1 Mix design proportion (Average Strength= 40 MPa) 

Material Dolomite Sand Cement Water
Mix Proportion (Kg/m3) 1120 585 500 200

Table 2 Uses of Potable water and waste-treated water for Tested Groups 

Group no. Casting Water Curing Water
1 Potable Water Potable Water
2 Waste Treated Water Potable Water
3 Potable Water Waste Treated Water
4 Waste Treated Water Waste Treated Water

The analysis was completed in the Central Laboratory (the Water and Soil Analysis Unit), at the Desert Research Center (DRC). Furthermore, potable water (PW) was evaluated for comparison purposes. Also, this section describes the experimental work performed through this study, beginning with the used materials, specimen details, measurement devices, test setup, and specimen grouping. All materials used to manufacture concrete were also examined. Ordinary locally available concrete constituent materials have been used to manufacture the test specimens. All specimens are made from one concrete mix with the proportion shown in Table 1. The target standard 28-day compressive cube strength ƒ cu = 40 MPa, and according to the equivalent compressive cylinder strength ƒ' c = is 32 MPa. The results of testing cubes have satisfied the target strength. Data of Egypt’s new administrative capital city Projects 2022 were taken from the Engineering Authority of the Armed Forces, which are displayed in Tables 7 and 8.

Four groups of 60 concrete standard cubes and 24 standard cylinders were cast. Each group consists of 15 cubes divided into 3 cubes that were tested after 7, 28, 90, 180, and 365 days. A direct tensile split test was conducted directly on 24 standard cylinders after 7 and 28 days for the four groups, each reading representing the average value of 3 specimens. The first group was cast with fresh normal water, and cured with fresh normal water as a control specimen. The second group was cast with fresh water but cured with treated water. The third group was cast with treated water but cured with fresh water. Finally, the fourth group was cast and cured with treated water. Table 2 describes tested cube specimens for each group, while Table 3 represents the chemical characteristics of concrete mixing water according to ECP 203/2018 to show the quality of water use; additionally, Tables 4 and 5 refer to the physical and chemical characteristics of treated wastewater, and Table 6 reports the standard requirements for Potable Water according to World Health Organization.

Table 3 Representation of the chemical characteristics of concrete mixing water according to ECP 203/2018. 38  

Parameter Results
pH 7
TDS gm/L 2.00
Chloride gm/L 0.50
Sulfate gm/L 0.30
Carbonate and Bicarbonate gm/L 1.00
Sodium Sulfide gm/L 0.10
Organic Substances gm/L 0.20
Inorganic Substances (Clay and suspended particles) gm/L 2.00

Table 4 Physical and Chemical characteristics of treated wastewater (TWW) 

Parameter Results
pH 6.1
Electrical conductivity (EC) µS/cm 394
Total dissolved solids (TDS) mg/L 241
Calcium mg/L 29
Magnesium mg/L 17.7
Sodium mg/L 20
Potassium mg/L 11
Carbonate mg/L 0
Bicarbonate mg/L 230
Sulfate mg/L 10
Chloride mg/L 38.3

Table 5 Representation of the analysis of Heavy metals in treated wastewater 

Element Ag Al Ni B1 B2 Ba Mn Ca1 Ca2 Cd Sb Co Mg
Units ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Cts/S ppm ppm
Average -0.368 0.4744 0.0388 -0.2428 0.1702 0.0485 0.0448 20.75 34.90 0.0016 zero -0.027 13.83
Stddev 0.0820 0.4618 0.0574 0.8133 0.1148 0.0126 0.0554 18.76 2.34 0.0284 zero 0.0981 0.98
% RSD 223.0 97.36 147.8 334.9 67.41 25.92 123.6 90.42 6.702 1772 zero 361.7 7.053
# 1 0.0309 0.3645 -0.044 -0.7124 0.1040 0.0462 0.0931 3.768 35.45 0.0327 Z -0.082 13.99
5.733
# 2 -0.0132 0.0774 0.1040 -0.7124 0.3027 0.0621 0.0572 40.89 36.92 -0.05 Z 0.1079 14.72
5.467
# 3 -0.1280 0.9812 0.0169 -0.7124 0.1040 0.0373 -0.0157 17.59 32.34 -0.0229 Z 0.0554 12.78
4.463
Element Cr Cu Si Sn Sr Ti Zn Mo Fe1 Fe2 V Pb
Units ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Cts/S ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm  
Average -0.2832 0.1730 1.819 35.83 0.3922 Zero 0.0213 0.0386 -0.406 0.426 -0.139 0.0660  
Stddev 0.3192 0.4862 0.073 8.35 0.0355 Zero 0.0327 0.0921 0.729 0.297 0.0442 0.670  
% RSD 112.7 281.1 3.988 23.32 9.058 Zero 153.6 238.7 179.4 69.85 318.4 0.1016  
# 1 0.0236 -0.1709 1.807 27.30 0.4079 Z 23.40 -0.0107 0.1400 -0.418 0.234 -0.361 -0.463  
# 2 -0.6135 0.7292 1.897 36.17 0.417 Z 23.20 0.0547 0.0155 0.328 0.7690.819 -0.426 0.8199  
# 3 -0.2596 - 0.0394 1.753 44.00 0.3515 Z 22.50 0.0198 -0.039 -1.13 0.270 -0.370 -0.158  

Table 6 Standard Requirements for Potable Water 

ECP203 of potable water World Health Organization39
T. D. S 500 mg/L 1000 mg/L
T. S. S - -
pH 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5
COD - -
BOD - -

Table 7 Case Study: New Administrative Capital City (Cairo- [Egypt]) 

Results and discussions

All results for all tested groups are presented in Table 9. A comparison of Compressive strength for four groups is presented in Figure 1. The comparison illustrates that the values of compressive strength decreased when treated water was used for casting or curing concrete. However, the compressive strength of concrete for groups 2, 3, and, 4 decreased by 9%, 11%, and 12%, respectively, compared to control group 1, in which the average of these percentages presented values of compressive strength at different ages for concrete 7, 28, 90, 180 and 365 days, these were discussed in details in Table 8. The tensile splitting strength of the concrete was also compared at 7 and 28 days for the examined four groups, as presented in Figure 2. Procedures for casting and testing of concrete standard cubes and cylinders are presented in Figure 3. Slump and compacting factor testing for fresh concrete were conducted for all groups; it provides good agreement with ECP 203-2018 guiding values for slump ranges from 75 to 125 mm for reinforced concrete sections with steel reinforcement varied from 80 to 150 kg/m3 and gives compacting factor value greater than 95% for the same reinforced concrete requirements. Figure 4 presents the slump and compacting factor for fresh concrete of group (1). Splitting tensile strength decreased by 10, 17, and 14 %, respectively, for groups 2, 3, and 4, which had good results in agreement compared to the control-tested group. From the failure modes of the standard cubes and cylinders, it is noticeable that some staining appears on a concrete surface, especially in the samples that were poured and treated with treated water, as presented in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. After completion of 7, 28, 90,180, and 365 days of the curing period, two cylinders for each concrete mix group were immersed in water for 24 hours, the concrete specimens were prepared, and initial weights of all cylinders were taken. After completion of every curing stage, weights of all cubes were taken again and registered as the final weight. The amount of water absorption in dried and cured cubes was calculated and compared in Table 10. This test is performed to determine the susceptibility of unsaturated concrete to the penetration of water. It measures the rate of absorption of water and other liquids into unsaturated concrete through capillary suction. Using treated wastewater for casting concrete had the highest percentage of voids (approximately 18%), which gave good agreement results compared to using potable fresh water for concrete casting (approximately 12%), Water mixing was the significant parameter that governed water absorption and void volume of concrete samples as presented in Table 10.

Figure 1 Presented comparison of compressive strength for tested four groups 

Figure 2 Presented comparison of splitting tensile strength for tested four groups 

Conclusions

The results obtained from the experimental study of various concrete mixes showed that wastewater had no significant negative effect on the mechanical properties of concrete, so using wastewater will save about 257349.386 m3 and 763905.677 m3 for standard and reinforced concrete quantity for the current case study in new administrative capital. Slump value had no significant change when using treated water for concrete casting or curing and agreed with the Egyptian code of practice for the design of reinforced concrete structures ECP 203-2018. The findings show that the compressive strengths of concrete groups 1, 2, and 3 decreased by 9%, 10%, and 11%, respectively, in comparison to concrete cast and curing with 100% potable water. Based on the obtained laboratory results for ages 7, 28, 90, 180, and 365 days, wastewater had a minor effect on the compressive strength results of concrete; however, it was used for casting or curing concrete at different ages. Splitting tensile strength had no significant negative impact by using treated water except for specimens cured with treated water.

Table 8 Egypt’s New Administrative Capital City Projects: 

Reinforced concrete quantity (m3) Quantity of water for reinforced concrete (L) Quantity of water for normal concrete (L) Quantity of normal concrete (m3) project Name No
1995426 349199550 85206625 486895 Residential district R1 1
1016111.313 177819479.8 40645224.38 232258.425 Residential district R2 2
22751.5 3981512.5 1568175 8961 Gate 5 3
3470 607250 11200 64 Gate 6 4
534746 93580550 21034125 120195 Central bus station 5
6860 1200500 165025 943 Development and expansion of the entrances to the capital 6
502964 88018700 44433550 253906 Banks Complex 7
1920 336000 158375 905 The new works of the people's arena 8
8944 1565200 1158500 6620 Flag column 9
148995 26074125 3383625 19335 Colleges and military institutes 10
5000 875000 52500000 300000 Egypt Mosque 11
117987484 20647809.7 7084962.5 40485.5 People's arena 12
4410175.297 763905677 257349386.9 1470567.925 Total 13

Table 9 Compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and slump, 

Group no. Compressive Strength (MPa) Splitting Tensile Strength (MPa) Slump (mm) Compacting Factor
7 days 28 days 90 days 180 days 365 days 7 days 28 days
1 330.37 434.70 512.95 521.70 573.85 11.70 16.70 56 0.98
2 304.10 405.50 470.40 477.90 520.90 10.40 15.20 58 0.97
3 291.90 394.50 453.70 460.20 497.10 9.60 13.90 55 0.94
4 283.80 388.90 445.30 451.30 478.40 8.60 12.80 56 0.97

Table 10 The average percentage of Water Absorption and Void Volume of Concrete Samples 

Group no. Age (Days) The Volume of Voids (%)
7 days 28 days 90 days 180 days 365 days
1,3 9.40 10.70 11.60 13.40 12.00
2,4 12.20 15.23 14.08 17.70 13.77

Figure 3 Preparing standard cubes and cylinders during casting and testing 

Figure 4 Presented Slump and Compacting Factor Tests for Control Specimen 

Figure 5  Failure Modes of Standard Cubes for Examined Four Groups at Age 28 days 

Figure 6 Failure Modes of Standard Cylinders for Examined Four Groups at 28 days 

From the paper results, the usage of partially or fully treated water may already have been reported, according to some observations; however, for pouring or curing concrete to save a considerable amount of potable water. The limits of this study are valid for concrete ages up to 365 days. The deficiency in compressive strength values of concrete is related to the number of tested samples and may vary with more samples.

Recommendation

For further research, it is recommended to:

  • Examine more and more specimens from cubes and cylinders at different ages to validate the effect of using wastewater on compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of concrete.

  • Examine the flexural strength of concrete through prism specimens to investigate the effect of using treated water, to cast or cure the results.

References

1 [] Y. Turhan, “The hydro-political dilemma in africa water geopolitics: The case of the nile river basin,” African Security Review, vol. 30, no. 1, Nov. 18, 2020. [Online]. Available: 10.1080/10246029.2020.1844775 [ Links ]

2 [] S. Yalew, J. Kwakkel, and N. Doorn, “Distributive justice and sustainability goals in transboundary rivers: case of the nile basin,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 8, Feb. 02, 2021. [Online]. Available: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.590954 [ Links ]

3 [] M. Aly, N. Refay, H. Elattar, K. Morsy, E. Bandala, and S. Zein, “Ecohydrology and flood risk management under climate vulnerability in relation to the sustainable development goals (sdgs): a case study in nagaa mobarak village, egypt,” Natural Hazards, vol. 112, Feb. 09, 2022. [Online]. Available: 10.1007/s11069-022-05220-2 [ Links ]

4 [] B. Megha, D. Ankita, G. Kalpesh, B. Sagar, and D. Pallavi, “Use of industrial waste water in concrete,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 10, no. 05, May. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijert.org/research/use-of-industrial-waste-water-in-concrete-IJERTV10IS050292.pdf [ Links ]

5 [] T. Asano and J. Cotruvo, “Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations,” Water Research, vol. 10, no. 05, Mar. 16, 2004. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.023 [ Links ]

6 [] Eureau(2017) Europe’s Water in Figures. An overview of the european drinking water and waste water sectors [Online]. Available: https://www.eureau.org/resources/publications/1460-eureau-data-report-2017-1/file [ Links ]

7 [] F. Abed, M. Nazzal, M. Attom, M. El-Emam, N. ElMessalami, and S. Al-Dabagh, “The use of wastewater in construction of base course layers in pavement structures,” presented at International Congress and Exhibition Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2017.[Online]. Available: 10.1007/978-3-319-61908-8_3 [ Links ]

8 [] F. Abed , M. Nazzal , M. Attom , M. El-Emam , andN. ElMessalami , “Use of treated wastewater in the construction of base course layers for sustainable pavement structures,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 30, no. 7, May. 2018. [Online]. Available: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002340 [ Links ]

9 [] O. Lee, M. Salim, M. Ismail, and M. Ali, “Reusing treated effluent in concrete technology,” Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 34, Jun. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11777693.pdf [ Links ]

10 [] M. Maeda, K. Nakada, K. Kawamoto, and M. Ikeda, “Area-wide use of reclaimed water in tokyo, japan,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 10-11, Feb. 24, 1999. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00406-4 [ Links ]

11 [] J. Haarhoff and B. V. der Merwe, “Twenty-five years of wastewater reclamation in windhoek, namibia,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 10-11, Feb. 24, 1999. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00403-9 [ Links ]

12 [] E. Friedler, “The jeezrael valley project for wastewater reclamation and reuse, israel,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 4-5, Nov. 22, 1999. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00517-X [ Links ]

13 [] M. H. McCrady, “Standard methods for the examination of water and waste-water,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 56, no. 4, Apr. 1966. [Online]. Available: 10.2105/AJPH.56.4.684-a [ Links ]

14 [] Y. Geng, Z. Wang, L. Shen, and J. Zhao, “Calculating of co2 emission factors for chinese cement production based on inorganic carbon and organic carbon,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 217, Apr. 20, 2019. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.224 [ Links ]

15 [] H. Marey, G. Kozma, and G. Szabó, “Effects of using green concrete materials on the co2 emissions of the residential building sector in egypt,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6, Mar. 18, 2022. [Online]. Available: 10.3390/su14063592 [ Links ]

16 [] H. Jahanbakhsh, M. Karimi, H. Naseri, and F. Moghadas-Nejad, “Sustainable asphalt concrete containing high reclaimed asphalt pavements and recycling agents: Performance assessment, cost analysis, and environmental impact,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 244, Jan. 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118837 [ Links ]

17 [] A. Akhtar and A. Sarmah, “Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 186, Jun. 10, 2018. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085 [ Links ]

18 [] Y. Izumi, A. Iizuka, and H. Ho, “Calculation of greenhouse gas emissions for a carbon recycling system using mineral carbon capture and utilization technology in the cement industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 312, Aug. 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127618 [ Links ]

19 [] V. Sousa and J. Bogas, “Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 306, Jul. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127277 [ Links ]

20 [] B. Kanagaraj, N. Anand, S. R. R., and E. Lubloy, “Performance evaluation of sodium silicate waste as a replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 375, Nov. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134172 [ Links ]

[21] H. Hamada, F. Abed , B. Tayeh, M. A. Jawahery, A. Majdi, and S. T. Y.F. , “Effect of recycled seashells on concrete properties: A comprehensive review of the recent studies,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 376, May. 02, 2023. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131036 [ Links ]

22 [] W. Chen, R. Jin, Y. Xu, D. Wanatowski, B. Li, L. Yan, et al., “Adopting recycled aggregates as sustainable construction materials: A review of the scientific literature,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 218, Sep. 10, 2019. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.130 [ Links ]

23 [] A. Sivakrishna, A. Adesina, P. Awoyera, and K. Rajesh-Kumar, “Green concrete: A review of recent developments,” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 27, Sep. 16, 2019. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.202 [ Links ]

24 [] P. Awoyera, J. Akinmusuru, and J. Ndambuk, “Green concrete production with ceramic wastes and laterite,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 117, May. 07, 2016. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.108 [ Links ]

25 [] H. Müller, M. Haist, and M. Vogel, “Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete structures considering their environmental impact, performance and lifetime,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 67, Feb. 26, 2014. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.039 [ Links ]

26 [] Standard test method for time of setting of concrete mixtures by penetration resistance, ASTM International, 2008. [ Links ]

27 [] B. Sealey, P. Phillips, and G. Hill, “Waste management issues for the UK ready-mixed concrete industry,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 32, no. 3-4, Jun. 04, 2001. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00069-6 [ Links ]

[28] (2007) Use of recycled water in concrete production. Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia. Sydney, AU. [Online]. Available: https://www.ccaa.com.au/common/Uploaded%20files/CCAA/Publications/Reports/RecycledWater.pdf [ Links ]

29 [] V. Mages and J. Sarrazin, “Le béton, une solution pour la construction durable,” Proparco Groupe AFD, vol. 10, Jun. 03, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://tinyurl.com/5e8f6j4m [ Links ]

30 [] K. Kucche, S. Jamkar, and P. Sadgir, “Quality of water for making concrete: A review of literature,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://tinyurl.com/5932a685 [ Links ]

31 [] M. Silva and T. R. Naik, “Sustainable use of resources - recycling of sewage treatment plant water in concrete,” in 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Ancona, Italy, 2010.[Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2f81/ff2e96bc811873fabf1f15ecbc389dc33827.pdf [ Links ]

32 [] K. Al-Jabri, A. Al-Saidy, R. Taha, and A. Al-Kemyani, “Effect of using wastewater on the properties of high strength concrete,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 14, Oct. 01, 2011. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.046 [ Links ]

33 [] C. Grengg, F. Mittermayr, N. Ukrainczyk, G. Koraimann, S. Kienesberger, and M. Dietzel, “Advances in concrete materials for sewer systems affected by microbial induced concrete corrosion: A review,” Water Research, vol. 134, Feb. 06, 2018. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.043 [ Links ]

34 [] N. Su, B. Miao, and F. Liu, “Effect of wash water and underground water on properties of concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 32, no. 5, Jan. 15, 2002. [Online]. Available: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00762-1 [ Links ]

35 [] A. Baikerikar, “A review on green concrete,” Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, vol. 1, no. 6, Nov. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://tinyurl.com/2p98zsye [ Links ]

36 [] Y. Serag, “The new administrative capital of Egypt: A critical review from the regional,” in 1st International Conference on Towards a Better Quality of Life, Technische Universität Berlin Campus, El Gouna, 2017. [Online]. Available: 10.2139/ssrn.3162316 [ Links ]

37 [] (2019) The smart revolution: Reimagining cities. Darmagazine i16. [Online]. Available: https://www.dar.com/content/publications/i16/#page/3 [ Links ]

38 [] ECP Committee, 203, 4th ed., Housing and Building National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt, 2018. [ Links ]

39 [] WHO Global Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Annual Report, World Health Organization, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/%20facts%202018/en.print [ Links ]

Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data availability statement All procedures were carried out in compliance with the institutional and national research committee's ethical requirements.

Recibido: 18 de Enero de 2023; Aprobado: 24 de Noviembre de 2023; Publicado: 24 de Noviembre de 2023

*Corresponding author: A. M. Mohammed-Hassanien e-mail: ameraraafat9@gmail.com

Declaration of competing interest

I (We) declare that I (we) have no significant competing interests including financial or non-financial, professional, or personal interests interfering with the full and objective presentation of the work described in this manuscript.

Author contributions

A. Marey: Conceptualization; Methodology; Analysis; Writing Mohamed M. Badawy: Conceptualization; Methodology; Analysis. Ahmed El-Romy: Methodology. Sherihan Adel: Conceptualization; Methodology; Analysis.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons