SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue1Usefulness of Direct Cholangiopancreatoscopy for Management of Pancreatic Calculi: Case Study (with video)Case Report of Vedolizumab Treatment of Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Associated with Psoriasis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología

Print version ISSN 0120-9957

Rev Col Gastroenterol vol.34 no.1 Bogotá Jan./Mar. 2019

https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.359 

Case report

The Sister Mary Joseph Nodule, a Semiological Finding that Should not Be Forgotten. Case Report with Video

Martín Alonso Gómez1  * 

Javier Humberto Riveros2 

Hernando Marulanda Fernández2 

1Médico internista y gastroenterólogo, Unidad de Gastroenterología y Ecoendoscopia (UGEC). Hospital Universitario Nacional. Profesor de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá D. C., Colombia

2Médico internista y gastroenterólogo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Hospital Universitario Nacional. Bogotá D. C., Colombia


Abstract

We present the case of a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding for whom the Sister Mary Joseph nodule was documented during the physical examination. Later, advanced gastric cancer was confirmed by means of digestive endoscopy and histopathological studies.

Keywords: Polyp; ball valve; intestinal obstruction; polypectomy

Resumen

Se presenta el caso de una paciente con hemorragia digestiva alta, en quien durante el examen físico se documentó el signo de la hermana María José, que se confirmó ulteriormente mediante endoscopia digestiva y estudios histopatológicos la presencia de un cáncer gástrico avanzado.

Palabras clave: Pólipo; válvula de bola; obstrucción intestinal; polipectomía

Introduction

The nodule, or sign, of Sister Mary Joseph is a malignant nodule in the periumbilical region which is associated with advanced abdominal neoplasia. 1 It was named in honor of Sister Mary Joseph of the congregation of Our Lady of Lourdes who worked as an assistant to Dr. William Mayo, the well-known surgeon. She frequently found this nodule while washing the abdominal wall of patients who were about to undergo surgery for abdominal tumors. 2 Its importance lies in the fact that it may be the only sign of presentation, progression or recurrence of a tumor. 3

Clinical case

We present the case of a 48-year-old woman who came to the emergency department because of pain in the epigastrium, unexplained weight loss, hair loss and hematemesis.

Upon physical examination, she presented ascites and a three cm purple nodule with a necrotic center in the periumbilical region (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Sign of Sister Mary Joseph. 

Among the paraclinical test results were findings of microcytic and hypochromic anemia. Kidney functioning, electrolytes and blood glucose were normal. The liver profile showed hypoalbuminemia with normal aminotransferases.

Upper digestive tract endoscopy found a spontaneously bleeding ulcerated tumor-like lesion with irregular edges that was approximately 45 mm in diameter. It was located towards the corporal antral junction, extended towards the posterior wall, and had multiple satellite polypoid lesions (Figure 2, Video 1).

Figure 2 Gastric cancer 

Video 1. The video shows navel metastasis of a patient with advanced gastric cancer. A large, actively bleeding mass can be seen. https://youtu.be/K9fyLHGhqL0

A biopsy of the umbilical lesion indicated adenocarcinoma, and samples taken during endoscopy confirmed that it was a moderately differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.

Discussion

The sign or nodule of Sister Mary Joseph is a purplish nodule in the umbilicus with a necrotic center. 4 It is related to metastatic lesions of malignant tumors of pelvic or abdominal origin. 5 Gastrointestinal neoplasms are the main cause, 6 but the mechanism by which cancer spreads to the periumbilical region is unknown. 7 The most widely accepted hypothesis is direct dissemination through the peritoneum. 8 Given its location, it is easily accessible for biopsy samples to be taken for histological analysis to establish malignant etiology. 8

The nodule of Sister Mary Joseph is associated with poor oncological and vital prognosis. 9 It is associated with advanced stages of the disease, multiple metastatic lesions and peritoneal compromise. 10

Referencias

1. Galvañ VG. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(5):410. [ Links ]

2. Urbano F. Sister Joseph’s Nodule. Hospital Physician. 2001;44:33-5. [ Links ]

3. Albano EA, Kanter J. Images in clinical medicine. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(18):1913. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm040708. [ Links ]

4. Powell FC, Cooper AJ, Massa MC, Goellner JR, Su WP. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule: a clinical and histologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10(4):610-5. [ Links ]

5. Majmudar B, Wiskind AK, Croft BN, Dudley AG. The Sister (Mary) Joseph nodule: its significance in gynecology. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40(2):152-9. [ Links ]

6. Gabriele R, Borghese M, Conte M, Basso L. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule as a first sign of cancer of the cecum: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(1):115-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0018-5. [ Links ]

7. Fill S, Taran A, Schulz HU, Kahl S, Kalinski T, Smith B, et al. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule as the first sign of pregnancy-associated gastric cancer: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(6):951-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.951. [ Links ]

8. Piura B. Umbilical metastasis: Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule. Harefuah. 2006;145(7):505-9, 550. [ Links ]

9. Abu-Hilal M, Newman JS. Sister Mary Joseph and her nodule: historical and clinical perspective. Am J Med Sci. 2009;337(4):271-3. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181954187. [ Links ]

10. Piura B, Meirovitz M, Bayme M, Shaco-Levy R. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule originating from endometrial carcinoma incidentally detected during surgery for an umbilical hernia: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274(6):385-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0189-0. [ Links ]

Received: January 30, 2018; Accepted: April 02, 2018

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons